O-Zone: Reliable sources

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Logan from Wichita, KS:
How can you say we are any closer to a better team than four years ago? Last I checked we were 2-5 and on the verge of our seventh Top 10 pick in a row. The talent honestly can’t be better because it’s not showing. Dante Fowler Jr. clearly lost a step in his speed and skills, Malik Jackson is not worth the price tag, Tashaun Gibson has shown he is not capable of changing games, Blake Bortles is going downhill fast, the Allen brothers have not shown they can repeat good seasons, this O-line is terrible – and other than that, this team is really mediocre at best. Come on, just fess up: We won’t be good for AT LEAST another five years at this rate.

John: I guess I say the Jaguars are closer to a better team than four years ago for a pretty simple reason: I believe they are a more talented roster than they were four years ago. This is not to say they are a team of experienced, veteran, mature players at all positions – because that’s clearly not the case. This also is not to say they are a good team – because 2-5 teams are not good teams. But there are far more positions with capable players than was the case four years ago. And while this is not a week to laud specific players, I will say that Fowler’s issues center around maturity more than skill set, that Jackson’s significantly more worthy than your email indicates, that the Allen brothers are more capable as well and that the offensive line is actually pass blocking well despite its run blocking … but as I said, the wake of Thursday’s ugly loss is not a time when anything looks or feels or smells or tastes good. As for my confession … while there’s no way I thought this team would be 2-5 after seven games there also is no way this team will need five years to be competitive. Not even close.

David from Broward County:
O-Man, in response to Jason from PA asking about Brandon Allen you said, “That does not mean he yet knows fundamentals and NFL basics – or that he is ready in terms of grasp of the offense – well enough to start in the NFL.” This very much describes how BB5 looks right now. I’m not saying you pull BB5 now, but you have to be prepared to do that very soon, and putting Henne in would be the wrong move. You start seriously getting Allen ready – tough given the CBA – but you have to do it, and be ready to pull BB5 soon if this lost, clueless, bad play continues. Leaving BB5 in to continue playing in this manner would surely ruin him more than sitting him down. Your thoughts?

John: I think let’s see what the next few weeks bring.

Jarrod from Chicago, IL:
ESPN referred to Bortles as a “basket case” and that the locker room has lost all faith in him. Have you sensed that from the team at all?

John: I sense a quarterback who’s having a remarkably difficult season and who appears to be going through the expected, understandable crisis of confidence that goes along with that. I see a locker room of teammates that knows that quarterback can play well because they have seen him do so – but that also is expectedly frustrated with losing. As for lost faith … I’m never sure how to gauge that. I sense Bortles’ offensive teammates are not as confident as a group as they were last season and it stands to reason that Bortles’ play is part of that. I also sense that a few productive games – or even a few productive series – would make a lot of things better in a hurry.

Mike from Section 238:
What are the CBA limits on how much one-on-one on-field instruction a quarterback can get between one Sunday game to the next during the season?

John: One-on-one time is not specifically limited by the CBA, so a player could theoretically receive one-on-one instruction any day except the players’ off day (usually Tuesday). But players are in meetings, walkthroughs, film study and practice on Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday – a schedule that severely limits time for one-on-one, mechanic/fundamental-oriented work. That’s what makes the offseason – particularly the time between the regular season and the beginning of the official offseason program – so important.

Paul from San Antonio, TX:
Hey O, so new OC and the rest of the schedule is gonna be tough except for a few games that we could win. Where do we go from here?

John: Kansas City.

Sam from Jacksonville:
O, I was able to enjoy multiple games Sunday without worrying about the dumpster fire that is my Jags. The thing that really strikes me is … so many NFL offenses have an obvious rhythm and smoothness to them from play to play. I can’t remember the last time my Jags looked like that. It’s so disheartening.

John: It indeed has been too long since the Jaguars have had a rhythm offensively. Offensive rhythm more often than not is reserved for teams with consistent quarterbacks functioning at a high level. Even when Blake Bortles was playing well last season he was rarely efficient and before that … so, yeah, it has been a while.

Mike from Jacksonville:
Blake Bortles does not have an NFL arm. Derek Carr has the velocity to make the tight coverage throws. David Caldwell has blown this one. What say?

John: I say that right now Carr looks better than Bortles. With Carr playing as he has played this season and Bortles playing the way he has played this season it would be foolish to say otherwise. It didn’t look nearly as clearly that way at the end of last season. If nothing changes, then yeah … it’s probably accurate to say Caldwell missed on the selection. Bortles obviously needs to fix some significant things in terms of mechanics and performance. If he can’t, then it’s a bad thing and he may have a short career as a starter. If he can, then we’ll all be revisiting this question.

Travis from Boynton Beach, FL:
O man, how are fans piling it on Bortles? The same guy moving the ball in the third and fourth quarter when defenses are playing prevent is the same guy passing for double-digit yards in the first half in consecutive games. Don’t get me wrong: I want Blake to be “The Guy,” but right now he only looks like that guy when the game is out of hand.

John: Yes, that’s how he looks – and it’s how he looked at times last year. When I said people are piling on Bortles a bit, I included myself as much as anyone. What I meant was there is a lot going wrong right now – and it’s truly not all Bortles. But is his play troubling right now, and it is a focal point when discussing reasons the Jaguars are struggling.

Mike from Jacksonville:
O, can you please explain why we must continue to be humiliated by former Jaguar coaches and players who go on to other teams, beat us and have better records as coaches and players of other teams? What’s a fan to do? For the last several years we have attend three games each season as a small and affordable way to support our team. However given our worsening record, we are giving serious thought to pulling the plug next year and just watching the games on TV. We will stick by our Jaguars but the excuses have run out. It is time for an honest and comprehensive evaluation of the Jaguars that incorporates the history of all levels of the people who are and have been in positions of responsibility with the Jaguars- top to bottom. What went right? What went wrong? Why are we not progressing in a positive direction? Sort of like an independent auditor. What say ye? Your continued candor is appreciated.

John: I say Shad Khan now has owned the Jaguars for nearly five years. I say he’s a remarkably intelligent man. I say when he makes decisions regarding the future of this franchise he will make them based on his experience, his research and his increasing knowledge of the NFL. And I say that’s how an intelligent owner should make decisions.

Travis from High Springs, FL:
Hi John. No question here. Just wanted to say I just read an article on another website about three trades the Jags should make before the deadline. One was trade Allen Robinson to the Cowboys for an offensive lineman, two was trade Blake Bortles to Cleveland for their first-round pick in the draft, don’t even remember the third. Just wanted to say that everyone may not always like your answers on the O-Zone but thanks for making statements that are informative, intelligent and at least based in reality.

John: It’s not always easy or even possible to be correct, but it’s quite possible to be more accurate and based in reality than the article you cite.

O-Zone: Unanswerable question

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Greg from Arlington, VA:

How much blame does Nathaniel Hackett get for Bortles’ mechanics regressing so much from last season to this season? How could he not see Blake Bortles‘ windup looking so pitiful and not doing anything about it? Very concerning for me.

John: A couple of thoughts here: One is that while a quarterback coach’s job does involve mechanics, identifying a mechanical problem doesn’t mean having a quarterback who is able to fix the problem. More pertinently, it also does not mean having time to fix the problem. Remember that under the current Collective Bargaining Agreement coaches are limited in how much time they have with players – and most of that time for quarterbacks is spent on execution, game-planning and practicing as opposed to working on mechanics. Tweaking and honing mechanics must take place before organized team activities begin, which is why Bortles worked with Tom House in California so extensively in the 2015 offseason. The most important thing to remember, though, is that Bortles’ mechanics have nothing to do with Hackett’s ability to game plan and call offensive plays. One has nothing to do the other – and how someone fares at one is no indication of how they will perform at the other.

Erik from Jacksonville:

Johnny-O, the difference between the Titans game and the other losses is that I felt nothing as I watched. Emotionless. I didn’t yell, cuss or throw my hands up in disbelief. I absolutely expected the loss – though not as bad as it was. I have mentally checked out for the season. It’s simply not fun anymore to watch or go to games. I am not alone.

John: I know.

Sam from Jacksonville:

O, thanks for all you do. My Cubs are in the World Series … the quarterback for my alma mater plays for the Bucs … and my remaining season tickets are on Stub Hub. I’ll check back in after Black Monday. The Jags will be lucky to win four games this year and I can’t take it anymore. I’ve reached the point of apathy … I never thought I’d get here.

John: I believe the Jaguars will win more than four games this season, though I can’t blame you for disagreeing. I also can’t blame you for apathy. That’s because it’s not up to you to avoid that feeling; it’s up to the team – and the team hasn’t played well enough to make you avoid it. There’s no rule that says the team can’t start playing better and make you feel better about the rest of the season. We’ll see if it does that.

Chad from Jacksonville:

Start Brandon Allen.

John: We’re not there yet.

Taylor from Maryland:

So if Bradley can change his mind and make a coaching change, then so can Khan, right?

John: Yes, though I don’t believe he will.

Mike from Middleburg, FL:

I agree with our coaching style – staying positive – but do you agree that we need to open up a can of whip a## to get things back on track?

John: I’m not a big believer that whip a## is needed to be a good head coach, but considering the unsportsmanlike conduct penalties that continue to occur, something is needed. The Jaguars pulled Dante Fowler Jr. out for the remainder of the first half after a second-quarter penalty Thursday. He has had a lot of silly penalties this season. Perhaps that’s a start.

Bill from Folkston, GA:

Do you think that putting Bortles in so soon in his first season has been a detriment to his development as a quarterback? Along with that I ask, did we do the same thing to Blaine Gabbert? Both have been put in behind substandard offensive lines and have taken a heavy toll on sacks. Do you think that possibly both had the potential to become much better than what they have?

John: No. In particular reference to Bortles, I never got the impression the past two seasons that he was suffering from any sort of heavy toll of being sacked too much. And he actually has struggled more this season playing behind a line this season that has pass blocked far better than it did in his previous two seasons.

John from Jacksonville:

What was it about Bortles that Caldwell liked that he didn’t like in Carr?

John: Potential, size, mobility, intangibles, upside – mostly upside.

Bruce from Freehold, NJ:

Someday we’ll look back on this and it will all seem funny … Nah, it’s total darkness on the edge of town.

John: Stay cool tonight, Eddie.

Tony from Jacksonville:

OK, so our defense gives up 354 yards in the first half and is playing worse than last year in spite of a huge talent upgrade, and we fire the offensive coordinator? Our quarterback regresses badly this year, and in your words is the single biggest issue with our team, and his position coach gets promoted? Smells like scapegoat to me.

John: I understand why you’re picking up that odor, and certainly any midseason coaching change has a tendency to take on that aroma. The Jaguars reached a point where something evidently needed to be tried. This is what they’re trying. It’s not the ideal option, but when you’re changing coordinators midseason it’s safe to say you’re past the point of ideal situations.

Clarence in Section 124 and Fort Worth, TX:

Is it possible for Bortles to improve his footwork and accuracy in the offseason or is it too late? I was also wondering if his throws are off because his arm may be tired or hurt.

John: Yes it’s possible to improve those things in the offseason. Bortles in fact improved those things in the 2015 offseason – though they seem to have regressed this season. It’s not my impression that his arm is tired or hurt, though that doesn’t mean it’s not.

Jason from Lancaster, PA:

O-Zone, can you let us readers know your thoughts on Brandon Allen? How does he look in practice, mechanics … accuracy, etc.? What are the differences between him and Blake?

John: My thoughts on Brandon Allen have been gleaned from organized team activities, training camp and preseason because we don’t see practice during the regular season. He has arm talent and throws a good-looking ball. He at times looked better in terms of spiral and velocity than Bortles; but spiral and velocity aren’t the NFL end-all. He appears to have a lot of positives, and I know the team very much likes his potential. That does not mean he yet knows fundamentals and NFL basics – or that he is ready in terms of grasp of the offense – well enough to start in the NFL.

Randolph from the Depths of O’Har:

I find it difficult to understand the piling on of Blake Bortles. Sure, he’s been inconsistent, and downright gun shy at points. However, he is the only bit of offense thus far. It’s him in the third and fourth quarter making things happen. With zero run game, and defenses having adapted to the Jags long ball threat, we are clearly a team with a very incomplete offense. I don’t understand how the majority of the offensive woes are placed on Blake’s shoulders. What say you, All Mighty O?

John: I agree that there has been some piling on of Blake Bortles – and without question I’ve been guilty of that here in the O-Zone. The Jaguars indeed have struggled in the run game and that is not all on Bortles. Still, the current NFL depends on the passing game executing at a certain competitive level. The Jaguars’ passing game, particularly in the last two weeks, hasn’t done that. Some of that has been receivers dropping passes, but the biggest factor has been Bortles’ inaccuracy and decision-making. It’s probably accurate to say those issues have gotten more play than any other issue facing the Jaguars, but the NFL is a quarterback-driven league. When that position is struggling it’s front-page stuff and nothing else makes the front page.

Kyle from Jacksonville:

So how long do we have to wait until we get a winning team? Every year we hear “this team is getting better. Wins will come. We are close. We are close.” I’m sick of the “just wait your turn” shtick. When will it finally be our turn? I’m really sick of waiting.

John: This is a common feeling among Jaguars fans and an understandable one. It’s also of course an unanswerable question. Many teams in NFL history have gone through long periods of losing and frustration. The Jaguars are in the midst of one that unfortunately compares to some bad, memorable eras. It’s difficult because losing stinks and it often seems as if the down cycle will last forever – or, as if there is no way out. This is not the case. It’s hard for people to see positives about the Jaguars right now, but the biggest positive is the roster is improved from four years ago. The climb from where the Jaguars are now to respectability is not nearly as long or arduous as it was four years ago. That doesn’t mean the Jaguars will make that climb in any certain amount of time because the NFL is not scripted television and there are no guarantees. But it does mean there is more hope than four years ago – even if that hope is tough to see right now.

O-Zone: Full analysis

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Trevor from Jacksonville:
Greg Olson. Fired.

John: This was a common sentiment in the inbox Saturday, and I get it. Many readers had focused on offensive coordinator Greg Olson as the reason for the Jaguars’ issues this season – and the team indeed parted ways with Olson on Saturday and replaced him with quarterbacks coach Nathaniel Hackett. I long have said I’m not given to a midseason coordinator or head coaching change because it’s usually change for change’s sake – and because such changes often produce little long-term gain. Hackett is very smart and very capable of running the offense, but I am skeptical Saturday’s move will have an earth-shaking impact on the offense. That has nothing to do with Hackett and everything to do with being skeptical that what ails the offense – quarterback Blake Bortles’ struggles and the offensive line’s struggles to run block – will be magically fixed. At the same time, the Jaguars’ offense had reached a point where nothing was working. The unit scored six first-half points in the past three games and the performance in a 60-yard, zero-points first half against Tennessee Thursday clearly had the effect of frustrating players on both sides of the ball. Maybe this move is change for the sake of change, but – as many readers have noted – there seems little harm to the team in changing. Perhaps the change will yield earth-shaking results. Perhaps it will spur players to respond. Perhaps Hackett will find something to help Bortles regain confidence. That’s certainly possible. Here’s hoping for the sake of this offense, the franchise and the quarterback that it happens. The aforementioned group and anyone associated with the Jaguars sure would think that was cool. They would like it.

Hank from St. Augustine, FL:
Gus Bradley said Friday he planned no staff changes. You wrote on Saturday there would be no changes. On Saturday, the Jaguars fired Olson and promoted Hackett. What happened?

John: Bradley changed his mind.

Scotty from Points North:
Sometimes, the fans are right. Sometimes, the pros are wrong. I think the Jag fans had this scented out a long time ago with Gus Bradley. I think it is unfortunate because I think we all hate to start over. As far as Blake Bortles goes, I think we all fear a prolonged rehash of the Blaine Gabbert situation were the organization keeps giving him more and more time to prove himself at the cost of the team. I want Bortles to be the man but I don’t want this to drag into the next season. Full disclosure … I looked at the draft boards for next year about a month ago. Never too early for a Jags fan. Thanks.

John: Many fans indeed gave up on Gus Bradley long ago. Many just as certainly did not. Many pros gave up on Gus Bradley a while back. Many did not. As far as Bortles … sure, it’s fair to fear that the Jaguars are traveling a road right now where they must give a young, highly-drafted quarterback a chance to prove whether or not he’s the guy. That’s the deal when you draft quarterbacks early. They must be given time to prove if they’re the guy. The signs haven’t been good the last two weeks. They were better last year. Which are right? The rest of the season could determine the answer.

CJ from Singapore:
Ok John, I’ve been a fan since the expansion year and I’ll admit this is by far the hardest year to remain a fan. I can’t think of a time more depressing for a true JAGS fan. Can you please tell me a time in Jaguars history when coaching change was needed more than now? The lack of discipline and accountability is embarrassing.

John: This is a brutally tough season so far – and indeed, the masses are expectedly roaring about coaching. And that roar has reached deafening levels. But that roar gets deafening whenever teams lose and whenever fan bases grow weary of a team’s direction. I won’t argue the fact that the Jaguars’ discipline on the field has been troubling this season. The unsportsmanlike-conduct penalties point to that. If the season continues in this vein, I can’t imagine changes won’t be made. Nine games remain. Time will tell.

Jeff from Rutland, MA:
I wish there was even one credible reason to believe this team could do better in any of the nine remaining games. There isn’t.

John: The way the Jaguars have played the last two weeks makes this point difficult to argue. What needs to happen to make the Jaguars play better? Improvement at the quarterback position would be a start. Improved run blocking would help, too. If those areas could have some success early in games and give the team a chance to play with a lead, it’s my belief that the Jaguars’ defense is more than capable of playing well throughout an entire game. That combination could move this team a lot closer to being competitive. This didn’t remotely happen Thursday but it has happened enough that it’s not insane to think it could happen again. It’s very difficult to win scoring two points per half offensively. That has been the Jaguars’ offensive production in the last three games. If that improves, everything else will look much better. Will it happen? I can’t predict that. If it doesn’t, it’s going to be a long nine weeks.

Bill from Hawthorn Woods, IL:
O … I heard the press conference. I hear what Coach Bradley is saying. What I don’t get is why we – and in this ‘we’ I’m including you and media more broadly in addition to the fans – are expected to buy into the CoachSpeak stuff? It never has been converted to action on any level of consistency or sustainability. I’m starting to tune it all out and becoming a bit apathetic. I fear I am far from alone.

John: There’s little any coach can say in a press conference to inspire confidence if results aren’t happening on the field. A press conference is by definition “talk” and therefore words. Action is what happens on the field. Actions speak louder than words.

Zach from Baltimore, MD:
I’m giving you a shot here. For the fans, can you make a valid point that Blake Bortles stats are not inflated because of garbage time/prevent defense?

John: Not in the last two weeks. As for last season, his statistics indeed were partly compiled late in one-sided games, but by no means were all of them overly inflated. He wasn’t great last season. He needed to improve entering this season. Those things are true, but to paint all of last season as being worthless and inflated is incorrect.

Jacob from North Carolina:
Too soon for draft. Too late for this season. No head coach changes. So, what do you think? Over or under: we win two more games.

John: Over.

Emile from Tallahassee, FL:
I’m not the oldest guy you’ll meet and I’m sure there are many people who’ve watched more football than me. However: I’ve seen a few good, franchise quarterbacks go through slumps – that’s not what this looks like to me.

John: No, this does not look like a slump. This at best looks like a young quarterback still finding his way and needing serious work on throwing motion and mechanics This at worse feels like a young quarterback who won’t develop into a franchise quarterback. Because of the last two games many believe it’s the latter. It’s up to him to prove it’s the former.

Ross from Fleming Island, FL:
More of a thought as opposed to a question. I do not expect Mr. Khan to make a change midseason. He is a brilliant businessman that realizes his product is failing. Instead of a knee-jerk reaction, I expect he is working on a plan to make changes, and will patiently wait (though painfully) to execute his plan when he believes it is in place and the time is right. I believe he hates losing as much as every Jags fan everywhere (maybe more), but he will approach this rationally. What says you?

John: I say you’re right. I don’t know that that means Khan absolutely has decided to make changes, but there’s little question he has a plan.

David from Jacksonville:
John, I can’t help but think if only we had beaten Green Bay we would be looking at a completely different season right now.

John: When the Washington Redskins lost to the Chicago Bears 73-0 in the 1940 NFL Championship Game, Redskins quarterback Sammy Baugh was asked if the outcome would have been any different had a Redskins player not dropped a touchdown pass early in the game. Baugh said it would have been different. The score would have been 73-7. Had the Jaguars won against the Packers they would be 3-4. Would that make the last two games feel different or changed their outcome? I can’t say that.

Shawn from the Lost:
Full analysis and tell us all the answers. GO!

John: ….

O-Zone: Somehow, someway

JACKSONVILLE – And so we move on.

We enter the weekend with the Jaguars 2-5 and the inbox in an uproar. Considering the result Thursday in Tennessee, that’s understandable.

We’ll say here what we’ve said the past few days: what’s going on is not acceptable, and it’s not pretty. Can the Jaguars find a way out of it? That remains to be seen. Nine games remain in this season. Something needs to happen or those are going to be nine long weeks.

We’ll try not to make this an all-Gus-Bradley-all-Blake-Bortles weekend. Considering the circumstances, there may not be an alternative.

Let’s get to it …

Howard from Jacksonville :
Why won’t we give Brandon Allen a shot? We know what we have in Chad Henne, so no need there. We will never be able to run the ball if the defense does not respect the quarterback. Bench Bortles and by default running game may improve!

John: The Jaguars haven’t benched Bortles because they have seen enough in Bortles to believe he can develop into a quality NFL quarterback. If he is benched it becomes unlikely he ever will develop into such a player for this franchise. The way Bortles has played in recent weeks has caused many to question his future, but for now the Jaguars must support him and believe.

Bill from Folkston, GA:
I see Shad Khan has stated that he will not fire the coach. OK, it is his team. Do you think it is time to sit Bortles? Even when he has time to throw, he has that deer-in-the-headlights look and he cannot throw a short pass accurately at all. Now, he can’t throw the long ball, either. He says it isn’t a confidence problem; then it must be a talent problem. To continue like they are is just driving this team further and further into the ground and driving fans away. Some change has to be made because it is apparent that this idea of fixing Bortles to fix the problem isn’t working. At least try Chad Henne; it couldn’t be any worse.

John: Never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever say it couldn’t be any worse.

Sebastian from Austin, TX:
O, I’m with the rest of the 100 percent of Jaguars fans still left. I’m disgusted, hopeless and resigned but I have to ask: Taking into consideration your years of experience around football, when there’s not one thing wrong and it truly feels like everything is failing, is there any chance something just clicks and the team starts to execute better and win – or does it truly takes months off and an offseason to start over fresh and right the ship?

John: Every situation is different. There have been situations in which 2-5, struggling teams indeed right the ship and even make the postseason. This does not feel like one of those situations, but those situations never feel savable until they are saved. What will it take for it to click? It must start with better quarterback play. That’s not to say that is all that’s going wrong. Not even close. The defensive effort and performance Thursday was questionable at best and bad at worst – and there are ongoing discipline issues. There also is the ongoing issue with the team’s run blocking. Still, it’s a quarterback-driven league. When the position isn’t functioning very little around it can function, either.

Dave from Los Angeles, CA:
I suppose it’s time for a full reappraisal of the rebuild project. Lately I’ve been leaning toward coaching being the problem – as in, Gus must go – but Dave can stay as he has generally built a talented roster (though quarterback now appears to be a huge issue). Thursday was dumbfounding. Are we sure Dave has built a talented roster? We keep saying we have a lot of talent, but talented players do not get blown out like that. Or is it mental? Has Dave assembled a physically-talented roster that somehow lacks the psychological/emotional strength to compete? How can a fully rebuilt roster in Year 4 play identically to the scrubs on the field in Year 1? Sorry for the rant. I’ll take your comments off the air.

John: When teams play as the Jaguars did Thursday everything gets called into question. I believe this is a more talented roster than Year 1 – or 2013, if you will. I believe it showed that in the first five games of the season. Frankly, so much is going wrong right now that it’s hard to pinpoint a reason. I believe the offense’s struggles are reaching the point where it is eroding a lot of other good things around it. I believe coaching has been an increasing issue in terms of discipline this season, and while that surprises me, something absolutely must be done to stop that being an issue. Mostly I believe that as bad as a lot of things look right now a lot could get solved with more efficient quarterbacking. It’s not the end-all and it hasn’t been the primary issue for four seasons. But it’s a glaring one right now.

JV from West Des Moines, IA:
John, please tell me what Shad expects for the rest of this season. To put it another way, how on earth does keeping Gus Bradley around for the next nine games benefit the team? It feels like there’s rock bottom, and then there’s what we saw Thursday. Just feels like something HAS to be done or it’s going to hurt the fan base.

John: This is a question I’m getting a lot. The benefit of keeping Bradley is there is little evidence historically of mid-season coaching changes making a tangible difference. That means that if there’s a chance of salvaging this season then that chance rests on stability. It’s clear Khan wants the organizational philosophy to be one of stability, and midseason coaching changes are the hallmark of unstable organizations. The cynical among us may state that 2-5 franchises that get blown out on national television while getting outgained 354-60 in first halves aren’t exactly rock solid in terms of stability, and it would be hard to argue that point right now with the cynical types. But the bottom line is that’s the reasoning for staying the course. A mid-season coaching change might have a short-term positive effect, but it likely wouldn’t be lasting. That’s the reasoning. Feel about it how you will.

Aaron from Duval:
You change coaches because this team has absolutely quit, John. You change coaches to see what you have in the players on the roster the rest of the season. You change coaches to give the fans any glimmer of hope going into next season. If you think carrying this momentum into next season and simply a new head coach and draft in the offseason will sell tickets I’m speechless. This franchise is at the point of losing diehard fans. Changing coaches may not alter the win-loss record for the season but giving us the same garbage every week and saying it’s fine is just disrespectful and embarrassing to people who spend their dollars and time supporting this franchise.

John: This is the other side of the coaching conversation. The points are valid. Readers are as upset and disillusioned, and understandably so. The product on the field hasn’t been good enough, and to follow up the Raiders performance with the Titans performance? Well, you used the word “embarrassing.” That fits.

Chris from Palatka, FL:
John, has this team quit on Gus? Do you think “they STILL believe in victory?”

John: It obviously hasn’t looked good on this front the past two weeks. It appears we have nine games to find out for sure.

MrPadre from Kingsland, GA:
John, I’m much more worried about the lack of effort than I am the lack of ability. After the loss to the Raiders at home … with their beloved head coach’s job seemingly in the balance – AND a pep talk from their Owner – they go out and look as if they aren’t even trying and worse … like they don’t even care!? How can professional athletes paid millions to “do their job” show that kind of apathetic performance? I’m sure this isn’t true but it dang near looked like they were “trying” to get their coach fired!

John: You’re right that the players weren’t trying to get Bradley fired, but I can’t argue how it looked – and I can’t argue that it appeared there was a lack of focus or effort at times. Something was undoubtedly lacking. That’s how it looked. Why did it look like that? I wish I knew.

Mike from Atlanta, GA:
I’m at a loss for words. What does a successful 2016 season look like at this point?

John: A successful season right now would be going 8-8. That would mean winning six of nine games. It would also help if the Jaguars got good quarterback play and went through the final nine games with no wheels-are-off moments. There must be progress. Somehow, some way. That’s what’s necessary. There has been little indication in the last two weeks of such a turnaround, but that doesn’t mean it can’t happen.

O-Zone Late Night: Titans 36, Jaguars 22

NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Wow. That was disturbing.

How else to describe what happened to the Jaguars in Tennessee Thursday night? The Jaguars lost to the Titans, 36-22, at Nissan Stadium and it didn’t seem that close.

Most of the questions in the in-box focus on Jaguars Head Coach Gus Bradley’s job security. Many fans want change. I understand that; it’s very understandable in the wake of a 2-5 start that isn’t remotely living up to expectations.

A one-sided loss on national television in the manner that the Jaguars lost on Thursday is the sort of loss that often leads to change. Will that change come? I do not know.

I do know what happened Thursday was bad, disturbing and ugly at times.

I’ll answer questions best I can. I doubt many answers will satisfy. Apologies in advance.

Let’s get to it …

Tommy from Corona, CA:

This is unbelievably pathetic. Looks like the ’76 Bucs. I love Gus, but this is Keystone Cops stuff. I am in shock.

John: Frankly, I am a bit shocked, too. I didn’t expect greatness from this team. I expected a push for .500, perhaps – and I certainly didn’t expect anything like what we saw Thursday. There’s very little to say. Thursday was total defeat. It shouldn’t be this way.

Paul Paul from Duval:

Week 8. Season over. Goodnight.

John: That’s how it feels. It shouldn’t feel that way because this season shouldn’t be 2-5 with one-sided, national-television losses. But that’s how it does feel. Bad. Really bad.

Terry from Chester, VA:

Pathetic and embarrassing.

John: For long, long stretches Thursday – yeah, pretty much.

Devin from Charleston, SC:

Are the wheels completely off yet?

John: If they weren’t off in the first half I don’t want to be around when they do come off.

Moshe from Mexico City:

The players have spoken: it’s obvious they want a new head coach. We (fans) deserve better, much better.

John: That’s an understandable sentiment. This was a team that needed to bring its best effort Thursday. That did not appear to be such an effort.

Shane from Washington, DC:

Just no offense…

John: No, there was no offense Thursday – at least not when it mattered. But on Thursday there honestly wasn’t enough of anything. There’s little question the offensive stagnation hurt, and ineffectiveness on that side of the ball drags everything down. But the Jaguars’ defense also allowed a 36-yard second-quarter touchdown pass to wide receiver Kendall Wright that was far too easy and the Titans had 354 yards offense at halftime. This was bad – inexcusably, franchise-shakingly bad – all around.

Brian from Does it Matter?:

You can see it in his face. No confidence. Gun shy with throws. Where is Blake’s head at John? And don’t say above his shoulders.

John: This is not the time for cute answers, though I’m sure I could think of a few. There seems little question that Bortles is struggling with confidence right now – and with reason. He’s not playing well. The Jaguars’ offense showed few if any signs of life early Thursday, and you never had a real feeling – particularly in the first half – that that was going to change. I don’t know where Bortles’ head is at. I only know this Jaguars offense doesn’t seem to have answers and it’s tearing apart the season.

Adam from Lynbrook, NY:

I have a feeling I’ll be going to bed early tonight …

John: This was the much-anticipated, over-analyzed, oft-ballyhooed first email of the game. No word on when Adam drifted into the land of nod.

Marco from Lima, Peru:

O, this project has failed. We have been out-coached by two former head coaches in a row. Offense is non-existent. Defense is undisciplined. Time for a change.

John: Thursday’s performance was the sort that often prompts change. I don’t know if it will prompt change in this case. We’ll see.

Chris from Mandarin, FL:

This year’s team is one of the worst versions I’ve seen. 14-41.

John: That’s certainly true of the offense, with the frustrating thing for the team obviously being that the defense in many stretches has played OK. They didn’t play remotely OK during the second quarter Thursday. But whatever … we won’t nit-pick on this one. Yeah, it’s bad.

Ross from Fleming Island, FL:
I feel for you. Your job is like trying to arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic. It is shocking how utterly lost this team is.

John: Shocking was absolutely the right word – for parts of this Jaguars season, but certainly for what transpired Thursday night. I expected the Jaguars to play disciplined and turn in an inspired performance Thursday. I don’t know that I realistically expected them to win because I thought without defensive tackle Roy Miller III this was going to be a tough matchup for the defense. I also doubted whether the offense could suddenly find itself in four days. But I didn’t expect 27-0 at halftime. I didn’t expect a 354-60 total-yardage edge for Tennessee at halftime. The degree to which the Jaguars were dominated was shocking. Absolutely.

O-Zone: It’s always something

NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Let’s get to it …

Tim from Arlington, VA:

Having Shad Khan talk to the players and coaches and ask them flat out “Why aren’t you winning?” surely must be the last straw for Khan before he fires Gus Bradley, right?

John: Not necessarily. Shad Khan meeting with the coaches and players as he reportedly did Monday certainly is not a great sign because it wouldn’t have happened had the team been 4-2 as opposed to 2-4. And while Khan has said often that he’s not pro-midseason coaching change there obviously for every owner is a tipping point when a change must be a made. I have no idea what will happen if the Jaguars lose to the Titans because I’m not Khan and deep down only he knows. But I don’t know that it’s correct to Khan speaking with the means he’s on the verge of a change. If he thought a change was the necessary move I imagine he would simply make a change rather than going through the process of speaking to the team and trying to find answers.

Marcus from Jacksonville:

In your assessment of the coaching staff you seem to be focusing only on in-game decisions. In that regard, they cannot be blamed for the team’s lack of success. Sure, there have been some bad play calls, but that isn’t the crux of the problem. However, you seem to forget the coaches are responsible year-round to make sure players are prepared once the season starts. They can’t take all the blame, but I think the coaches are partially at fault for the poor run-blocking, the poor quarterback play and the stupid mistakes that are happening on seemingly every play.

John: There’s no question coaches are partially at fault. I don’t think I would ever say coaches weren’t partially responsible for on-field goings on; that’s their responsibility. But far too often in the NFL coaches are blamed and fired for the sake of blaming and firing – and are blamed and credited for things over which they in fact have comparatively little control. I’ve said often a head coach’s primary job is to create a structure and an environment in which players can be successful and in which winning can occur. That in essence is “steering the ship” and ensuring all players are essentially moving in the right direction. That is what Head Coach Gus Bradley has done well even while the talent level on the team precluded the Jaguars from winning more games. That’s what was concerning about the fourth quarter of Sunday’s loss to Oakland. There was some out-of-control stuff that reflected on the culture of the organization. It certainly didn’t appear all players were on the same page. That’s a bad sign. It doesn’t mean things are absolutely out of control; remember, Bradley’s teams don’t have a trend of such behavior … but the fourth quarter Sunday was bothersome. No doubt.

Deb from Jacksonville:

John, I really hate the word “poise.” We aren’t talking about bladder protection or little girls in a ballet. We are talking about grown (or semi-grown as the case may be) men playing football. Thanks.

John: OK.

Jay from Gainesville, FL:

So, would you like to see Marks and Jackson man the middle – or Jones and Jackson? Marks is a beast! He is good in the run game and passing situations.

John: I think you’re going to see a heavy rotation inside – heavy enough where it won’t matter who starts. I agree that Marks is a beast, but he’s a beast who has had injuries in recent seasons and you don’t want him playing 900-1,000 snaps a year. Rotation, rotation, rotation.

Tom from Charleston, SC:

Is it not possible and even probable that the poor run game is a consequence of Gus’ determination to use a zone-blocking scheme? He has changed personnel and moved people around and still can’t run at a high-school level. It has become obvious this team is not capable of running a zone scheme. Why not change up and go in a different direction? It couldn’t possibly be any worse than what we’ve seen to this point. Isn’t four years of failure enough?

John: I’ve never been under the impression that the zone-blocking scheme is all Bradley, but yeah – at this point I wouldn’t mind seeing more power running.

Newt from Jacksonville:

I need to ask another quarterback-related question. I know Blake Bortles worked with Tom House before last season. What other quarterbacks have done the same with Mr. House? Additionally, how – if any – is Mr. House currently employed? If I were the general manager or higher, I would pursue Mr. House’s talents with extreme urgency. Just adding my two cents to the end there….

John: Multiple quarterbacks such as Tom Brady, Drew Brees and Andy Dalton have worked with House and Adam Dedeaux on throwing mechanics and other quarterback-related skills. They run their program from Southern California. I have no idea how much they make. My guess is it’s enough in both cases that they don’t need to seek full-time employment elsewhere.

Matt from Jacksonville:

John, been a fan since the beginning but I’m starting to sense a growing discord between the players and fans. To call out and/or slight our fan base for being upset at the poor product on the field is a tacky look. First Telvin Smith then Rashad Greene and now Allen Robinson. Sure, Shad signs the checks but I guess these players are starting to forget where the $$$ comes from..Sad. (If any of the above players are reading this, the money comes from the same fans that have been filling the stadium since 1995. We’re talking about the stadium where there hasn’t been a winning season since 2007!)

John: I’m including this email because it remains a major topic a few days removed from Robinson’s comments about the fans and Wembley Stadium. I’m not ignoring the questions, but I can’t answer them all. Fans are mad about it – and reasonably so. It wasn’t a good thing to say. You can’t touch the third rail. It never plays well.

Stu from Wrestlingworth, UK:

Here’s my take on the season so far. We lost a close game to the Packers, the team’s collective heads then weren’t right against the Chargers. We lost a close game to the Ravens with some poor quarterback play. The team stumbles to two wins against poor teams then falls heavily to a good one. At this moment, it feels like the coaches are playing conservatively to prevent major blowouts, the offense is under too much pressure to perform and is forcing plays and the defense – certainly last Sunday – is getting frustrated with playing some winning football and not winning. Fair or no?

John: I don’t think the coaches are playing conservatively. I think they’re trying to do the things they feel will work based on the strengths and weaknesses of the players. I also think it’s a struggle right now for the offensive coaches to know what this team is doing well, but that’s quibbling. Yes … fair. Very fair.

Bill from Folkston, GA:

Do you think it was the youth of Jalen Ramsey to say he would do the same thing 90 percent of the time – being ejected for fighting – or do you think that he really has no concerns about the team?

John: Neither. I don’t think he was saying he would get ejected for fighting 90 percent of the time. I think he was saying he would react the same way and that his actions normally wouldn’t get him ejected for fighting. In watching what occurred I had the impression Ramsey and Raiders wide receiver Johnny Holton were ejected largely because there were other incidents going on in the fourth quarter and that the officials ejected the players to maintain control of the game. Had Ramsey’s incident occurred in the first quarter of a game with no other altercations I don’t think it would have gotten him ejected. I believe that’s what he was saying. Perhaps he could have made that point clearer, but I was standing next to Ramsey when he spoke. I didn’t remotely get the idea that he was saying he has no concerns about the team.

David from Orlando, FL:

Of the top 10 salaries on this team, eight are from free agency. We’ve reached a point where some of Dave Caldwell’s draft picks are going to be demanding big money. That means this very team that struggles to win games is going to cost Shad Khan a lot more money in the near future. Houston, we have a problem. What are your thoughts?

John: I think it won’t be difficult to discern who should be signed long-term and who shouldn’t be signed long-term.

Adam from St. Johns, FL:

Bortles isn’t passing the Eye Test and we always hear people saying to trust the eyes. I guess his mechanics can improve over time (footwork is atrocious) but decision-making … well … that might not. I’m afraid we’re witnessing the mighty fall of one BB5 and that just sucks.

John: I don’t think we’re there yet, but it’s a legitimate discussion … and yeah, if you’re a Jaguars fan, that does suck.

Tom from Katy, TX:

OK, John: You’re Greg Olson. You’re watching a line that can’t produce consistent runs, a quarterback that can’t make routine NFL throws and is off the mark more times than not and several drops by normally sure handed receivers. You look down at your play sheet – what do you call? My point is…I’m not sure it’s coaching!

John: Oh, Tom, Tom, Tom … in the NFL, it’s always coaching. You know that.

Adam from Saint Johns, FL:

If we all agree the Jaguars suck, then why don’t we ever see anything different? Same post-game speeches, same culprits making mistakes. Other places the media gets after the team and ask real questions. Other places, they fire an offensive coordinator or a defensive coordinator to make a statement. We just stay status quo because everything is fine. This team is losing everyone and it doesn’t seem to care.

John: I was wrong in my previous answer. It’s not always coaching. Sometimes the media is to blame.

Thomas from Jacksonville:

Not that you care. But it seems all of my friends who are diehard football fans have had enough. It’s not the Jaguars losing, coaching. It’s officiating: killed the integrity of the game. Honestly we’re done. Declining ratings are just the beginning. But hey … greed kills everything. Corruption.

John: Oops: wrong again. It’s the officiating.

O-Zone: The Pretender

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Josh from Section 106:
It was disappointing to see Allen Robinson speak disparagingly about the home crowd. I have owned season tickets for the last 15 years – since I could afford them – to the tune of several thousand dollars annually. We have put up with season after season of losing. If they win some games, I bet the crowd doesn’t boo as much. Let him know I said don’t worry about the boos and just go cash his game check. Too bad they can’t dock his pay for those two drops … Oh, well.
 

John: This unsurprisingly is a hot-button topic this week – and you know what? It absolutely should be a hot-button topic. Robinson on Monday commented about fans booing during a one-sided loss to the Raiders Sunday at EverBank Field. His comments drew pretty much the same reaction from fans and readers as similar comments by Telvin Smith early in the season: anger and resentment. That reaction from fans is correct and understandable. Fans had every right to boo the performance Sunday, just as they had every right to boo earlier in the season – and just as they have every right to boo whenever they choose. I get that booing bothers players. I get that it hurts. I get that from their perspective they’re doing all they can to win and they’re working hard. This is an emotional, high-intensity game and many players understandably react emotionally to being booed. At the same time, when teams don’t meet expectations, being booed is part of the deal. It’s also the third rail of NFL fan-player relations. Players who touch that rail by criticizing fans do so at their own risk. It’s never going to play well. Never.

DJ from Charleston, SC:

Please give me a good reason to let Blake keep starting. Put in Henne or Allen and look for our new quarterback in the offseason.

John: The reason you don’t bench Blake Bortles is doing so pretty much finishes him as a starting quarterback in Jacksonville. He has struggled this season, but he hasn’t struggled enough yet to change the direction of the franchise at that position.

Michael from Tucker, GA:

During the preseason, I made mention that the Jags can’t stop the run if either Miller or Poz is not in the game. Well, this news about Miller is probably the worst news possible. The only thing we had going for us was a defense that kept us in every game. My question, now that we can’t stop the run the rest of the year, what can be done to save our season?

John: You say the news about Roy Miller III being out for the season is about the worst news possible. You are correct. Miller’s presence has been key to this team’s run defense the past several seasons, and there usually has been a pretty direct correlation to the presence of him and middle linebacker Paul Posluszny to stopping the run. Abry Jones and Sen’Derrick Marks are expected to play in Miller’s place. How they play and how the team responds to Miller’s absence could go a long way to determining how this defense plays the rest of the season.

Josh from Jacksonville:

I remember repeatedly saying “I’m not worried about the offense…” during the preseason. Is it rare for things to have regressed so badly in the offseason with very little personnel changes?

John: This is the most prevailing question around the Jaguars in recent weeks, but the reality is the Jaguars’ offense hasn’t regressed all that significantly. This was not a great offense last season. It was a good offense at times that produced very good statistics at times. But many of the same issues from last season – slow starts, running-game issues, turnovers, not scoring enough when the game was in doubt – are plaguing it again. The problem is the offense was expected to improve with a group of young players having played together two seasons. That hasn’t happened and the result is a lot of disappointment within the team and outside of it.

Daniel from Jacksonville:

Jalen says he would “do it again” and “won’t be disrespected.” Stupid hothead. Doesn’t he realize that he can’t help us win games if he’s ejected and that he just made himself even more of a target for every receiver he’ll face the rest of the year to try and bait him into a fight? Make your statements with your play, not your mouth, rookie.

John: I look at the Jaguars right now and think there are a lot of things about which to worry. Jalen Ramsey’s not on that list.

Scott from Section 237:

Can you explain why Blake Bortles is so inaccurate and such a long release and trouble throwing fade routes after three years? Are there any other successful franchise quarterbacks playing in the NFL with those types of mechanical issues? Also why doesn’t Bortles throw any timing routes? Finally when I watched Bortles the whole game he seems to wind up to throw with a delayed motion like Byron Leftwich.

John: Can I explain why Bortles is so inaccurate? I honestly can’t, except that his footwork doesn’t seem fundamentally sound right now and his mechanics from the naked eye don’t seem sound, either. Sure, there are franchise quarterbacks in the NFL with mechanical issues; Philip Rivers’ motion is hardly textbook and he’s absolutely elite. As for why Bortles doesn’t throw timing routes, so far they don’t seem to be a strength. Look, we can pick apart all of these issues with Bortles – and I’m sure we will until he begins playing better – but he has shown in the past he can play far more effectively than this. He’s going through a very difficult time right now – the toughest time of his three NFL seasons. It’s up to him to pull out of it. The Jaguars believe he will. We’ll see.

Graham from Dundee, Scotland:

O! Out of curiosity, after all the penalties against the defense how would an opposing team assess the Jags’ D? Would they say that it is indeed still a young team up and coming and learning how to play together? Or would they see this as an already good “D” and beginning to look nasty and getting a reputation of being physical and strong?

John: I’d say they would see it as a young, ascending defense that still lacks a dominant pass rush. That makes it a formidable defense – but a beatable one and one that has a tough time intimidating or forcing turnovers.

Garrett from Ballston Lake, NY:

O-man, this week is a HUGE week for us. Well, every week is from here on out. But if we beat Tennessee and Indy and Houston lose to two very good teams we are a game out of first place in the AFC South, which is absurd to think about. Hope is still alive. Somehow, someway we still have a shot! Go Jags!!

John: You’re right, but the standings are a periphery issue right now. This team needs to beat the Tennessee Titans Thursday and they need to look like a composed, disciplined team with a functioning quarterback. If they do those things then hope is still alive.

Marco from Lima, Peru:

The only bright side on the Jags; debacle is that our division sucks. We are still a game and a half away of the Texans and by beating Tennessee and the Texans in the upcoming weeks we can get back on top of our division. They just need to start playing some football. Moodachay!

John: #DTWD

Mike from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:

John, I am confused about our passing game. If teams are double covering A-Rob then why are we not throwing deep to Lee to pull the safety away from A-Rob? Lee is our fastest receiver, yet I do not recall us throwing deep to him once this season. Look what Derek Carr did with Michael Crabtree at the end of the half. A-Rob will continue to be doubled until we force them to respect our deep shots.

John: Teams are playing more two-deep safeties against the Jaguars to take Robinson away, but the two-deep approach can discourage deep balls to other receivers, too. Still, your point is a good one. Bortles did throw deep to Lee once this season: in Week 3 against Baltimore. It nearly worked. It wouldn’t be a horrible idea to try that again.

Jerrel from South Carolina:

If I pretend to be Jerrel from South Carolina will you answer my question? Is the AFC South the worst division in football? We had so much hype in the offseason now we have the most pathetic division.

John: Jerell spells his name with one “l.” I know this because we’re close.

O-Zone: Reasonable expectations

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Julio from Hesperia, CA:
O, be honest right here, right now! Do you think this team is way too talented to be underperforming, which points to coaching as the issue?

John: I in fact never have been dishonest on this issue. I said repeatedly this past offseason I really didn’t think we’d know about Head Gus Bradley and this staff until this season. That’s because the talent level the past three seasons didn’t really give the Jaguars a legitimate chance to win. That was very true in 2013 and 2014 and it remained relatively true last season. Now, we’re six games into this season. Is the 2-4 record to be blamed on coaching? I think this defense this season has played well. It’s the first time in this four-year era that either side of the ball has played at what could be called a winning NFL level – and yes, I include the 2015 offense in that assessment. The major issue right now is the offense is ineffective because the run-blocking is struggling and most of all because the quarterback is struggling. If you believe the coaching staff is responsible for struggling run blocking and quarterback play, then coaching is the issue. I don’t believe this staff has coached poorly this season. Neither do I believe it has been great. I believe it has coached OK by NFL standards and that if the team had good-to-average quarterback play, the team would be above .500. That doesn’t mean this staff automatically will be back. I doubt the Jaguars can finish below .500 and there not be changes, but what has gone on this season is by no means all the fault of the coaches.

Gerry from the Westside:
Blake Bortles was bad Sunday. Really bad. But it’s a reach to blame him for the intentional-grounding penalty. That should not have been called.

John: You’re referring to the play in the fourth quarter when Bortles was called for intentional grounding after the Raiders were called offside. I wrote Monday that Bortles needed to be more aware of the situation. I looked at the play again later that day. I was wrong. Khalil Mack was unimpeded to the quarterback and Bortles grounded the ball. A penalty should not have been called.

Michael from Yulee and Section 214:
At what point does the staff step back and say what are we doing wrong? And when will they start making the right play calls? Correct me if I am wrong, but in the beginning of the fourth quarter the Jags had only thrown 12-23. I understand you can’t throw the ball a lot if it is just three-and-outs. But I think they called way too many running plays when pass plays should have been called. It is to the point we the fans are just excited for a 40 field goal to get a free sub.

John: Jaguars running backs ran 11 times Sunday. To run any less would be the equivalent of not running at all. It’s also not particularly prudent when your quarterback is struggling to complete passes.

Jake from Chicagoland, IL:
Zone, this week it seemed in general pass protection looked pretty good; some plays Blake had a lot of time. It’s tough to see receivers on television …. was there separation? How about on the season? Accuracy issues are obvious and much-discussed. It’s tougher to know when other opportunities are there.

John: The separation hasn’t always been great this season, but generally speaking this hasn’t been a problem severe enough that it should completely shut down the offense.

Kyle from Panama City, FL:
It’s nice to see Marqise Lee stay healthy and become an important part of the offense. That’s about all the positive I can see out of this team right now.

John: That’s probably not quite fair, because the defense actually has a lot of components playing at/near a winning level. Still, your point is a good one: Lee has remained healthy this season and has impressively earned a role in this offense. He is the only receiver right now consistently productive in the middle of the field, and he was the only part of the offense Sunday that provided any consistency. He entered this past offseason with a goal of staying healthy and letting the rest – playing time, production, opportunity – take care of itself. He has stayed healthy and improved accordingly. Credit to him.

Travis from Athens, GA:
John, you are wrong again. This team is very, very, very consistent. Once again we at 2-4 we are on the bottom of the AFC and one of the six worst teams in the league. And that my friend is very consistent with the last few years.

John: Point taken.

Scott from Minneapolis, MN:
The offense is just leaving too many plays on the field. Plain and simple. Now how to fix that? That’s the question I’m happy I’m not being paid to answer.

John: The fix is better execution – not only from the quarterback position, but from receivers and the offensive line in terms of run blocking and the running backs. The offense seems broken; I get that. But there were opportunities to score Sunday and the Jaguars didn’t take advantage of the opportunities. Criticize play-calling all you want – and right now everything is up to be criticized – but the simple truth is the offense must play better.

Taylor from Maryland:
What happened to the Allen Robinson in training camp that dominated?

John: Much of Robinson’s drop in production this season stems from fewer big plays. Much of the reason that has happened is defenses are scheming to take away the deep pass. An argument can be made that Bortles needs to throw the ball his way even with defenses scheming against it, but whatever the reason, the lack of production on deep passes has been noticeably absent. The other issue seems to be that Robinson – like many of the Jaguars’ offensive players – appears to be pressing and trying to make big plays. That perhaps attributed to Robinson’s drops Sunday.

Tim from Atlantic Beach, FL:
In reference to the intentional grounding call, why doesn’t a quarterback get called for this when he intentionally spikes the ball to stop the clock? Obviously, the center’s foot isn’t an intended receiver.

John: That’s not intentional grounding because the rules say it’s OK to ground the ball to stop the clock if that’s clearly the intent of the quarterback.

Josh from Green Bay, WI:
Consistently inconsistent … is that a fair assessment?

John: Yes.

J Hooks from Orange Park, FL:
I know this has been overlooked for other more pressing issues, but what is with Dante Fowler Jr. and his really, really boneheaded penalties? Give the kid a rulebook! His ignorance of rules and not being able to line up in a straight line aren’t helping our cause.

John: You’re right.

Lee from St. Mary’s, GA:
Would these issues even be issues under a Tom Coughlin-led Jaguars team? I know it’s players not plays, but what we saw Sunday isn’t new. Blake looked lost.

John: The penalty issues in the fourth quarter Sunday … yes, a strong argument can be made that that’s on coaching. There were far too many personal-foul/out-of-control incidents, and while you would like to think that professional players would conduct themselves accordingly, coaching is going to rightfully be blamed when such things happen. That sort of behavior hasn’t been a trend, but one such afternoon is too many such afternoons. As far as blaming coaching for Blake Bortles looking “lost” … that’s difficult. Blame coaches for play-calling and discipline, but if Bortles looks lost, it’s up to him to look un-lost.

Tom from South Dakota:
Ramsey is legit.

John: Yes.

Depressed fan from Jacksonville:
How is the defense so good and the offense so bad? Help me understand, O.

John: The defense is playing better this season because it added better players and for the most part those players have been good additions. It’s not a great defense because it’s not rushing the passer at a dominant level or creating turnovers, but it’s a good enough defense to usually keep the team in games. The offense’s struggles are in one sense surprising but in another sense not. Many believed the offense would be good this season because it was productive at times last season. The problem was while the offense indeed was productive at times last season, it struggled early in games, lacked consistency and depended on big plays in the passing game for success. Bortles also threw too many interceptions. Many of those issues remain issues and without the big plays in the passing game the offensive struggles look even more glaring.

Jon from PEI, Canada:
Hey O. Going into this game I didn’t expect a win, though I definitely expected a close game. This was far from reality. Am I wrong in expecting the Jags to be competitive in most of their games at this point in the regime?

John: No. Absolutely not.

O-Zone: One simple word

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Jonathan from Virginia:
I think Gus needs to shake the tree a bit with BB. Do you think benching him for a half or a game would help? I ask because of how Fitz responded this week and how Miami seems to be doing better with their benching policy on players.

John: No, I do not think benching Blake Bortles would help the current situation. Bortles’ problem this season is not a lack of motivation. His problem has been accuracy, interceptions, decision-making, carelessness with the ball at times and turnovers. Those aren’t going to get fixed by a half-game benching. Plus, you don’t bench a franchise quarterback in the NFL until you know it’s over for him as the starter. That’s because in many respects, franchise-quarterback benchings are permanent. Once you bench The Guy it’s very hard if not impossible for him to ever be The Guy again. There’s no going back. Bortles is struggling, but we’re not at the point that it’s over for him as the starter. Not yet.

Rob from Rochester, NY:
I understand Blake was drafted to be the Franchise Quarterback and he started to look like one last year. This year, he has taken a major step back. The stats that showed last year was more luck than talent are sure looking accurate. When do you get another quarterback to compete for a starting job? Do you let Blake play out the contract and assess?

John: First, what Bortles did last season wasn’t luck – but there’s no question his struggles this season are getting to the point of being confidence-shaking. Bortles has a year left on his rookie contract after this season. If you’re asking if the Jaguars absolutely will start him throughout that contract if he continues to play like this the rest of the season … no, I do not think that’s automatically the case. He needs to show improvement between now and the end of this season.

Juan from Port Orange, FL:
I’ve been behind Gus Bradley for all this time, defending him and wanting to give him more time for the turnaround. But enough is enough. Gus and the players can keep saying that they are not the team we see on the field (undisciplined, inconsistent, etc.), but in the end you are who you are and they are indeed not a very good team right now. I hope Gus can still salvage the season, but I can’t defend him anymore! Thanks for the vent??

John: This is as good a place to vent as any – and certainly a lot of the poise issues in the fourth quarter Sunday must be attributed to the coaching staff. While players such as middle linebacker Paul Posluszny were blaming themselves after the game (Posluszny was taking responsibility as a team captain), such a breakdown of discipline must be addressed by the coaches. There overall has been of lack of discipline this season; while that hasn’t been the norm under Head Coach Gus Bradley and the staff, through six regular-season games this season that has been the character of this team. That said, the Jaguars didn’t lose Sunday – and they haven’t lost this season – because of those issues. The biggest reason for the struggles this season is an offense that was expected to take a step forward has not in fact improved. That’s why the Jaguars are 2-4 and if they don’t get better in that area the record is going to get worse.

Thomas from Williamsburg, VA:
Can we talk about Dante Fowler Jr. for a second? Lines up offsides twice in the same half and then should have been flagged for shoving that guy in the back (luckily the Oakland guy got a personal foul for retaliating) when the defense just made a huge third-down stop in the fourth. I’m just a curious fan looking for answers. Thanks.

John: Fowler so far this season has been as noticeable for his mental mistakes as his big plays. That’s not a positive statement.

Mike from Atlanta, FA:
The defense is very good. They are on the field way too much. The offense is holding them back because they can’t stay on the field. Jalen Ramsey, is he there yet? He looks like a shutdown corner from where I’m sitting.

John: The defense is good and the unit indeed has been on the field too much. The main issue with the defense is it hasn’t affected the passer enough with the pass rush. As a result, it has not forced turnovers. Still, even with that being true it has played well enough to win at least four of six games. Did it play well enough to win Sunday? Perhaps not, but it sure played well enough to keep the team in the game a lot longer than it should have considering how the offense and punt-return team played in the first half.

Rob from Section 122:
I don’t understand how our offense can’t move the ball when Allen Robinson‘s deep/jump balls are taken away. Shouldn’t that mean either Allen Hurns, Marqise Lee or Julius Thomas should be able to beat one-on-one coverage? If the line is pass-blocking well, and there are plenty of proven weapons, how are we not easily scoring 21 a game? Has Bortles accuracy/awareness been that bad to where the receivers are not being found/hit?

John: At times, yes. Sunday was one of those times.

Matt from Fort Worth, TX:
Is Dante Fowler Jr. a great pass rusher?

John: Not yet. That’s not unusual for a player in his first season. Most great pass rushers take enormous steps from their rookie seasons to second seasons.

Greg from Fernandina Beach, FL:
Roy Miller III out? I don’t like that, Zone …

John: You’re correct not to like it. Jaguars defensive tackle Roy Miller III left the game in the third quarter with an Achilles injury. He was immediately announced as not returning. The whole situation sounds like a very serious injury to a player who is critically important to the defense. Miller played at a high level throughout last season and had done so again this season. He’s a reason this team is usually stout against the run and he is a team leader. If he’s out for the season, that’s a big loss.

Jason from Jacksonville and Section 140::
John, this game was a measuring stick for the Jags and the Raiders as both teams have been on the rebuild with similar draft pick positions. The Jags are behind dramatically on offense, and most notably, quarterback. If Bortles doesn’t show marked signs of improvement for the remainder of this season, the Jags are going to have a decision to make about their future at quarterback – and whether they can continue to fall behind.

John: Well, yeah.

Dakota from Fleming Island, FL:
Putting the entirely disappointing start to the season to the side for a moment, in how did we get an intentional grounding after an offside penalty Sunday? I’ve never seen that and it seems entirely wrong. The quarterback is allowed to save himself from a hit in that way (at least according to every other game I’ve seen in my life) since the opposing team jumped offsides to be able to hit them that way. Was this somehow different?

John: The play was not blown dead. The perception that offsides gives the offense a free play is a correct one in the sense that the ball will not be awarded to the defense if there is a turnover. The quarterback must be aware enough to realize that. The quarterback also must be aware enough to know that if both the offense and defense commit a penalty on a play those penalties offset – even if the defense is offsides and the offense’s penalty is intentional grounding.

Noel from St. Augustine, FL:
Time to read your columns that help perpetuate this false narrative that this team is any better than seasons past.

John: Sunday was a bad performance – and yes, that was almost all my fault.

James from Socorro, NM:
Intentional grounding on a “free” defensive offsides play? That is the most Jaguars thing ever.

John: It was not a “good look.” It also showed a lack of awareness. The play is a free play in the sense that if the quarterback throws an interception it will not count. It does not mean a penalty can’t be called on the defense. Bortles took a situation that should have been a free opportunity and turned it into an offsetting penalty. That’s rookie stuff. It shouldn’t happen in a quarterback’s third season.

Josh from Section 106:
One word. Undisciplined.

John: There were a lot of words that could be used to describe the Jaguars’ performance Sunday – disappointing, frustrating, ridiculous, inexcusable – but yes … the one you used was certainly as good as any.


 

 

O-Zone: Hidden identity

JACKSONVILLE – Game-day O-Zone.

Let’s get to it …

Alex from Orlando, FL:
This game is huge. Who do you think wins, and why?
John: I’m not a big predictions guy here in the O-Zone, but I think the Jaguars will win Sunday if they play well – and yes, I expect them to play well. They’re playing at home with at least some measure of momentum. They have saved their season with victories in the last two games – and they have a real chance to put themselves in a very good situation over the next five days. If they win the next two games then the 0-3 start that threatened the season suddenly seems far in the past. Their defense is covering well – and it seems to be improving by the week. I also expect the defense to play the run well – and the run is where Oakland’s offense really begins. The ‘X’ factor, of course, will be the Jaguars’ offense. If it can protect the ball and hit big plays, then I think the Jaguars will win. They haven’t done either enough this season. I expect they will Sunday.

Damien from Jacksonville:
How much, if any, advantage is it to the team that Greg Olson worked closely with Derek Carr a few years ago? Thanks!

John: Very little.

Ed from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:
I don’t see why fans are complaining about our running game. Our offensive line has a few problems – but overall our running game is OK. Am I totally wrong?

John: You’re not totally wrong – though to be honest, you’re kinda close. The Jaguars have shown signs of running well at times this season – early against Green Bay and San Diego; in London against the Colts – but overall this area hasn’t been good enough. Not nearly.

Dave from Orlando, FL:
O-man, now that he appears to have lost his starting job, what is the role of Davon House on this football team?

John: Back-up.

Spence ‘O Matic from Jacksonville:
O-Man: Marqise Lee‘s display of ability last week in Chicago gives the offense a vital third weapon at wide receiver … that in many formations will still allow the Jags to have a tight end to block and help the running game. To me, Lee’s emergence will do more to help the running game than a lineman’s development. The only thing this does, though, is leave multi-million $$ man Thomas on the bench. What say you?

John: I say the Jaguars need to get their best players on the field. Yes, that may mean Lee playing instead of Thomas in some early-down situations. I doubt the Jaguars take this approach too much because they like the balance a two tight-end set gives – and they like the defensive match ups created by two tight ends. But Lee is playing well enough that he could be forcing his way onto the field more regularly.

Jim from Middleburg, FL:
This team has made great progress. Because there are 31 teams that place great value on the offensive line, you can’t just go shopping at Wal-Mart to pick up a couple of spare tackles, guards, and centers. I wrote during preseason this team would start slow and improve as the season and develop into a 7-9 or a 8-8 team. I still believe it will happen. We play six games in the AFC South against teams that we are able to beat. Add just one or two wins outside the AFC South and we all can celebrate. Keep Gus Bradley for this season. Period.

John: OK.

Chris from Mandarin:
No, John, the best option to play center was Alex Mack, but the team elected not to pursue him. If they had, we could have left Brandon Linder at left or right guard depending on where him or Cann were better at. You can’t spend all the monies at once, I suppose.

John: Your opinion and that of David Caldwell differ on this matter. That’s OK. Differing opinions are legal and healthy in this country.

Pogie from Orange Park, FL:
Top eight in yards per game on defense … take the Charger game out, probably Top 2 or 3. Guess what I’m saying is once this offense gets going … look out. Fans need to recognize this is possibly one of the best teams we’ve seen in Duval. Ever! Go Jags.

John: Let’s let the Jaguars get to .500 first, Pogie.

Will from Orlando, FL:
Is it fair to expect a well-rounded, solid game from Blake Bortles considering the subpar defense coming in to the ‘Bank on Sunday? I feel like this team doesn’t just need a win, it needs a convincing “W.”

John: It’s fair to expect anything you want. I don’t know that Blake Bortles’ issues will be magically solved because the Raiders are ranked 32nd in the NFL. So far, his issues this season seem to run deeper than that – and by that I mean they are more about what he’s doing than what defenses are doing. He needs to be more accurate, make better decisions and be sounder with the ball when under pressure. He will face pressure Sunday because Khalil Mack plays for the Raiders. Either way, if Bortles plays well Sunday, it will be because he played well and made strides in areas where he needed to do so; not because the Raiders allowed him to do so.

Bruce from Green Cove Springs, FL:
29th in total offense; 24th in total defense. Tell me if I’m off-base, but I can’t see how overall performance in the bottom tier can translate to a winning record. I’m not giving up, mind you, but I’m struggling to see the light at the end of the tunnel. John, you’ve been around a long time – is it more a personnel issue? Or is it that the personnel we have simply aren’t performing to expectations?

John: The Jaguars are ranked No. 8 in the NFL in total defense.

Preston from Oakville, CT:
I may be in the minority here, but the way the Jaguars are playing has me filled with optimism. The offense has struggled much more than I would like, but we have seen that they have big-play ability. The fact that the defense is as far along as they are means that we have the pieces in place and it’s time to see them bring it all together. Your thoughts?

John: My thought is that this game Sunday has a chance to be a very important game for this franchise. I do get the feeling that this team is close. That feeling doesn’t come from the offense nearly as much as it does from a defense that indeed appears to be improving rapidly – and appears to have the tools in terms of speed and ability to stop the run to be sustainably good. As far as the offense …. yes, there is big-play ability. More important than that, though, it must improve in the running game and Bortles must be more accurate and reduce turnovers. The good news for the Jaguars is those latter two areas don’t need to improve dramatically for results to be positive. The smallest upturn could yield significant results. We’ll see if that happens.

Jeremy from Wise, VA:
I expect to see more three- and four-wide receiver sets and more no-huddle in the game Sunday. I know Gus wants to run the football, but how about letting the pass set up the run? We all know too well that this year, they haven’t been able to run consistently on traditional running downs and situations. What say you, O?

John: The pass only can set up the run if the pass is effective. We’ll see if that happens Sunday.

Tom from Orlando, FL:
My prediction for the first three rounds of next year’s draft: Right tackle, guard, strong safety.

John: There obviously is a long way to go before the draft – as in, 11 regular season games and perhaps more games after that – and much can change between now and then. But those indeed are spots where the Jaguars could have needs next offseason. The good news for the Jaguars is none of those are spots that traditionally have to be filled in the first round to be filled effectively. The other good news for the Jaguars is it’s no guarantee that all three will have to be filled. We’ll see.

Will from Orlando, FL:
How much longer can we expect Julius Thomas to be a highly-paid acquisition with minimal impact on the offense?

John: The Jaguars haven’t gotten Thomas as involved this season as would be ideal, and some of that has been Bortles’ trouble getting him the ball (witness a third-down overthrow early in the third quarter last week). Thomas is an important piece of the offense. His presence does help others around him because defenses have to account for him. But there’s no question the Jaguars would do well to get him more involved.

Glen from Section 408:
Great job this week; here’s one for you Oehser!!

John: Is this Jerell?