O-Zone: Still all in

KANSAS CITY, Missouri – Game-day O-Zone.

Let’s get to it …

Glenn from Dallas, TX:
For the past couple of years you have been saying the most impressive thing about Gus Bradley is he hasn’t lost the locker room – that the players seem to be “all in.” This year feels different. There are nasty rumors coming out of the locker room, and the team looks completely demoralized on the field. Is there any defense of Bradley left? Also, do you think the dramatic shift is the influx of new players that “know how to win?”

John: I don’t think we can definitively say Bradley has “lost the locker room,” although there’s no question there’s more frustration this season than the past few seasons. That frustration seemed to show up on the field in the fourth quarter against Oakland and the second quarter against Tennessee. If it continues in that vein, then it’s indeed not a good reflection on Bradley and the coaching staff. But for now my sense is it’s not as much about players not listening to coaches as an overall frustration with losing – and with an offense that is struggling to get first downs. When that happens, frustration is a logical end – though it’s still disturbing to see it manifest itself in the manner we’ve seen in recent weeks.

Kyle from Palm Harbor, FL:
Here’s a prediction: The Jags get smashed by a better team on Sunday, Hackett gets fired and Oehser steps in as offensive coordinator. I’d love to be wrong, but this team hasn’t shown anything to expect otherwise.

John: I will not be stepping in as offensive coordinator.

Ryan from Dearborn, MI:
John, honesty time: What are the odds the Jaguars come out of Arrowhead with a win?

John: The odds are from any objective point of view are small – very, very small. Arrowhead is a brutally tough place to play. That’s one issue. Another is the Chiefs are playing very smart and mistake-free – as evidenced by their plus-nine turnover margin. The Jaguars are not playing smart or mistake-free – as evidenced by their minus-eight turnover margin. The Jaguars also haven’t beaten a team two or more games over .500 in the last four seasons. None of that means the Jaguars can’t win Sunday, but it does mean that a Jaguars victory would be one of their bigger upsets in recent memory.

Michael from Middleburg, FL:
It keeps being said Bortles needs to work on his footwork, pocket presence, throwing motion and I don’t know what all else. Why do you or anyone think this will change anything when there are four-to-five rookies and new quarterbacks playing who are miles better than a
third-year quarterback “trying to fix hisself ” … he should “be fixed.”

John: Yes, it would be wonderful for the Jaguars if Bortles was one of the young quarterbacks in the NFL playing at a high level. He’s not. So, what … he should just stop trying?

Mike from Jacksonville:
I don’t get it. All I read in your column is that Blake Bortles is to blame for the Jaguars’ losing. You ignore everything else – coaching, the run game, the defense. Why?

John: I have written often that there is a lot going wrong with the Jaguars, but in the NFL, quarterback play trumps all else. No, the play-calling has not been perfect, but to my experience in the NFL, play-calling can always be questioned. And yes, the defense has played poorly at times – particularly against Tennessee – and the run game has been weak. But struggling quarterback play is a bigger concern than those issues, and it’s why Bortles remains a focus. The No. 1 issue for this team entering the season was whether Bortles would continue the improvement he showed last season. The No. 1 issue is now whether he can pull out of the struggles he is having now and get back to something like he was last season – and then develop after that. For whatever else is going on, that remains Storyline No. 1.

Luke from St. Louis, MO:
Hello! Brand new Jaguars fan here. The Rams showed themselves unworthy of support before they left town and I’m very excited about my new team. The postgame comments I’ve seen, though, have been interesting. Even though the team isn’t doing well, it’s clear they care, which is more than can be said about the Rams. It seems like the Jaguars have no clue what’s going on and why things aren’t going well. Is that accurate from your perspective? How close are the Jaguars to getting some answers?

John: Welcome, Luke. My perspective is you’re right about these players and coaches caring. My perspective is that they care very much, and that’s why the frustration level is so high. This team and fan base generally had a very strong belief it was going to be better this season, and with that being the case it’s not surprising that poor on-field results have caused negative reaction. I don’t think what’s going on is as much of a mystery as players and coaches are saying publicly. The offense has struggled mightily in the first seven games, and those struggles have caused what might have been a 3-4 or 4-3 start to be a disappointing 2-5 start. A huge part of the offensive struggles has been the play of Bortles and another huge part has been the inability to run the ball. Some of the perception that the Jaguars “don’t know what’s going on” stems from the team not really wanting to call these areas out over and over again. The move to promote Nathaniel Hackett to offensive coordinator and for Bortles to work with his personal quarterbacks coach this week were made at least in part to address those issues. We’ll see if those moves work – and if they do, we’ll see how much of an effect they have on the Jaguars’ results.

Robert from Moorpark, CA:
Is the 2016 season over for the Jaguars? Needing perspective.

John: The season is not over, but at 2-5 they need to win some games fast – and those games probably need to come on consecutive weeks with very few losses mixed in.

Don from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:
In 1996 after nine games the Jags record stood at 3-6. Most of the games after that were decided by three points or less. Just saying, Zone. Just saying …

John: #DTWD

GenuineJag13:
The more I listen to Gus, the less I know about the direction or the focus of this team. The sendoff speech that he had for Greg Olson sounded a lot like the one he gave to Jedd Fisch back in 2014 and you know what? The same offensive problems back then are still the same. Good luck, Nate.

John: There’s realistically not a whole lot of new, creative ground to cover when a head coach dismisses a coordinator. The talk typically is about a need for a change, and a need for improvement. They’re usually made with an understanding that a departing coordinator is not all at fault but that something needed to be done and changing the coordinator is possible while changing a roster of players is not. Will Hackett cure every Jaguars offensive problem? Highly doubtful. Can a change lead to at least some improvement? That’s certainly the hope and the rest of the season pretty much hangs in the balance. We shall see.

Cade from Orlando, FL:
I know we will never truly know the answer to this, but I am interested in your opinion on the matter. Do you think if Blake Bortles had two-to-three years to sit like Aaron Rodgers did and actually have the time to work on his mechanics like Rodgers did without the pressure of playing every week added in, do you think we would be looking at a more mechanically refined quarterback by this point? Also, how different of a career do you think Rodgers would have if maybe he didn’t have that time like he did to start his career?

John: I suppose it’s possible that two or three years working on mechanics would have helped Bortles. But you’re right that we’ll never know and I think the cases of first-round quarterbacks getting that much time to develop will continue to be very, very rare.

Fehr from Jacksonville:
So you promote the quarterbacks coach of the current worst quarterback in the NFL and you expect to see better results. Isn’t that insanity?

John: Quarterbacks coach and offensive coordinator are two dramatically different jobs. Bortles has not flourished this season, but that doesn’t mean Nathaniel Hackett can’t call plays effectively.

Chris from Crestview, FL:
John, not really a question – but I’m attending the game this Sunday in KC. I can’t wait to see the team, and even if the season has been disappointing, I’ll be sitting in the front row watching the Jaguars play with my Bortles jersey on. Fans gonna fan, but this is still an NFL football game, and I’m really excited to see this team in person.

John: #DTWD

O-Zone: Bargain-hunting

KANSAS CITY, Mo. – Let’s get to it …

Bill from Hammock, FL:
There have been many questions about Blake Bortles’ mechanics lately. I don’t understand how he can at times be completely off, yet at other times (last quarter of last game) there are very few inaccuracies. Do you think his accuracy issues are due to the pressure of a close game?

John: Bill, if I had the answer to Bortles’ mechanics issues I not only would be on the Jaguars’ coaching staff, I’d pretty much be the star of the show around these parts. I also would be making a far sight more than is currently the case. The best answer I can give is that Bortles’ accuracy issues seem to stem from inconsistent footwork and body positioning, which at times seem lead to mechanics that are poor enough to cause him to throw really, really inaccurately. That’s not all of the time, but it has happened often enough this season to be a serious concern. It also has happened often enough that he addressed it by working with Adam Dedeaux – his personal quarterbacks coach – in Jacksonville Monday and Tuesday. Will that work benefit Bortles? Jaguars Head Coach Gus Bradley said Bortles looked good in practice this week. Bradley also said there overall has been a different – and presumably, better – feel to practice this week with new offensive coordinator Nathaniel Hackett running the offense. Will that better feel translate to better performance Sunday? Ah … ‘tis indeed the question.

Kris from Copenhagen, Denmark:
How can you hate pie??? And how long does Bortles get to improve?

John: My guess is Bortles will start the entire season because I think he would have to struggle the way he has the last two games for several more games for the Jaguars to consider starting someone else. I can’t imagine him continuing to play this poorly because I have seen him play better than this in the past. As for pie … OK, maybe I was exaggerating. I don’t hate all pie – just the kind you like.

Max from Logan, UT:
John – just exactly how much on the field is the doing of the head coach, really? Is there a way to figure that out? When I see players making mistakes in professional sports, I blame the players who made the mistakes. I guess I’m trying to seriously figure out just how much of this should really fall on Bradley.

John: There’s no way to determine exactly how much of what happens on the field truly falls on a head coach. If a head coach, for example, tells a player multiple times in practice to run a pass pattern in a certain way and he doesn’t, is that the fault of the player or coach? If a player physically isn’t good enough to win a matchup and he loses that matchup, is that the fault of the head coach? Reason tells you in both cases that the head coach couldn’t control that situation. At the same time, this is professional sports. In professional sports, the head coach gets credit when teams win and blame when they lose. In that respect it’s all the responsibility of the head coach.

Scott from Section 237:
Mechanics and accuracy aside, what other areas does Bortles have to improve in order to be a decent quarterback? How do you teach reading defenses and finding open receivers and timing routes, for example?

John: He must improve decision-making and pocket presence. Both typically improve with experience, and both have been areas of concern at times for Bortles.

Ryan from Detroit, MI:
John, how different would this franchise look today if we had actually found a franchise left tackle in the 2013 draft?

John: Well, the Jaguars would have a franchise left tackle – and Kelvin Beachum probably wouldn’t be on the roster. Beyond that …

Mike from Jacksonville:
Really? Two good days of practice? Week 9 of a five-year rebuild, and we talkin’ about practice!? How about a really good game? Also, while I have you reading (or closing) this email, I just don’t find it compelling – the change at offensive coordinator. We had Greg Olson last year, no Chris Ivory, and the offense balled. I really thought we upgraded our offensive line too. This season is over. OK, I’ll stop; I’ve driven myself to a dark, dark place. Go dumpster fires … I mean, Jags.

John: Well, that wasn’t very nice now, was it?

Keith from Palatka, FL:
You cannot win in the NFL without a good offensive line and a good quarterback. We have neither. The right side of our offensive line (A.J. Cann and Jermey Parnell) allow defenders to hit running backs a yard and half into the backfield according to Pro Football Focus. On the left side, Kelvin Beachum is still not 100 percent recovered from his ACL injury, and even if he was, he was never a great run blocker to begin with. Patrick Omameh was an unmitigated disaster in Tampa Bay (and still is). That leaves Brandon Linder as the only solid player on the offensive line. Why are people still bewildered about our inability to run the football?

John: The Jaguars’ offensive line actually has pass-blocked OK for the most part this season. The unit has not run-blocked well. There is optimism that that will change under new offensive coordinator Nathaniel Hackett. I understand people not sharing this optimism. We’ll see if it looks different Sunday.

Brian from Section 238:
To all Jaguar players who are mad at the fans, 1. Start winning and the constant barrage from the fans will stop. 2. You get paid to WIN games, not to play football. 3. Tell you what, I’ll yell on every defensive down on November 13 – if you beat Kansas City. #Promisefromthefans

John: OK.

Peter from Perth, Australia:
Hey, O. If Blake’s mechanics and play improve this week would you think the coaching staff would sacrifice a bit of practice time with him so he could work with the throwing coach? To me, game planning won’t matter if it is taking him too long to set feet and throw. Thoughts?

John: No. I don’t think the Jaguars would take that approach. First, while Bortles’ mechanics could improve and solidify a bit this week from his work with Dedeaux, there’s a limit to how much you’re going to get done in this area during the season. Second, anything Bortles does with Dedeaux will be on his own time rather than within the framework of normal game preparation.

Jeff from Rutland, MA:
So, what would you do? It’s the middle of December, and the Jags are still playing the way they have the past two weeks. Bortles gets injured. Do you start Brandon Allen to see what he can do? Or Chad Henne?

John: I’m assuming for the purposes of your question that the Jaguars will no longer be in playoff contention. If that is the case in your scenario, I would start Brandon Allen.

Marcus from Jacksonville:
You have said repeatedly that the talent on the team has improved. Do you think it has improved to the point that the Jags will seek a veteran quarterback via free-agency or trade in the event that Bortles is deemed to not be “the guy?” To me, if the talent is at a playoff-caliber level, then starting over with a rookie is a bad move. Obviously, it all depends on who is available, but this is all hypothetical.

John: Hypothetical is the operative word here because with nine games remaining there is still a lot of time this season to get a better read on Bortles’ future. It also is important to note that the support for Bortles as the starter for this organization right now remains strong. A lot of this issue also obviously depends on how Bortles responds to the work done with Dedeaux – and to the changes Hackett implements to the offense. I’m skeptical that we’ll see dramatic immediate change. The question in that case would become whether or not you believe that more diligent work in the coming offseason can allow Bortles to first get back to how he played last season but – more importantly – develop and improve from that point. If the team decides he’s not the guy, the process would be much the same as for any team seeking a quarterback: determine what’s available via free agency/trade and decide if that is the solution you seek. If not, draft the best quarterback you can. The positive in that scenario is that the learning curve for a young quarterback needn’t be as long as once was the case. The negative is that a new quarterback by definition is a mammoth upheaval and you don’t know the results until it plays itself out.

Keith from Jacksonville and Section 436:
Writing about Gus Bust saying there been a couple of really good days just shot your credibility down the loo. If we had a nickel for every time we’ve heard that the Jags had a good week of practice followed by a stink bomb of a game, we could buy the Jags from Shad Khan.

John: I don’t think Shad Khan would sell the Jaguars to you for that price.

O-Zone: None fer Zone

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Scott from Fernandina Beach, FL:
Hi, John. I really feel the quality of our offensive line is much higher than the quality of the run blocking. Kelvin Beachum, Brandon Linder and A.J. Cann should be solid; left guard, not as much – and Jermey Parnell at least has continuity. Not saying a real good line – but better than their production. I sure hope Nathaniel Hackett sees something that will improve the run game.

John: This is one of the key areas to watch in the coming weeks. I say “coming weeks” and not Sunday because I don’t know that you’ll see the totality of what Hackett wants to do offensively in just one game. Still, the change in coordinator is perhaps the best chance to see if this line indeed can improve as a run-blocking unit. The line actually has pass blocked well this season – well enough, certainly, for the passing offense to function at a higher level. But the running offense with rare exceptions hasn’t worked this season. Is that simply because the unit can’t run block? Should the offense be more committed to it? Can Hackett find down-and-distance situations from which to run that can give the Jaguars more success? Those are some questions that should get answered in the coming weeks.

Damien from Jacksonville:
John, I have heard it reported that Blake Bortles will have to learn his third new offense in three years. I also believe I remember you saying a lot of the differences between new playbooks involve the language that is used. Is there any reason why teams don’t develop their own team language and require new hires (offensive coordinator, defensive coordinator or coach) to learn the team language? Would it not be easier to have the new offensive coordinator learn the team language as opposed to having the entire offense learn a new language? I assume there is a reason as to why teams do not do it this way, but I am having trouble thinking of why. Thanks!

John: There are a couple of reasons. One is that a coordinator essentially would have to rewrite and retranslate an entire playbook upon arrival with a team, something that would add to the complexity of the situation as opposed to simplifying it. Making the changes also would cause time to be spent on minutiae and details rather than teaching the playbook. Perhaps the biggest reason you wouldn’t force a “Team Language” is you would significantly cut down your coordinator pool of candidates. If a coordinator had a choice between a team at which he could use his own playbook/language system and one at which he had to “translate” his system into the verbiage of another team, he almost certainly would opt for the place where he could use his own system.

Travis from Daytona:
11-5…?

John: Sure. Why not?

Jesse from Jacksonville:
Why is it that our coaches fail to realize that the only thing hurting our team is that they’re not allowing Blake Bortles to be Blake Bortles? Isn’t it evident by now that he’s clearly uncomfortable trying to change his mechanics style?

John: Your email indicates that Jaguars coaches are somehow forcing Bortles to change his mechanics against his will. Nothing could be further from the truth. Coaches really don’t care how a quarterback throws if the passes are effective and accurate. That hasn’t been the case with Bortles. Also, it’s Bortles who in two-plus seasons in the NFL has focused on mechanics – and with reason. He knew upon entering the league they were – and perhaps – always would be an issue on which he had to focus. He has worked hard on this front at times in his career – and there have been times that diligence has produced results. He got some work in this area again this week – sort of a touch-up, if you will. We’ll see if that touch-up has the desired effect.

Adam from Lynbrook, NY:
Sometimes I hate that I love this team.

John: I know.

Kevin from Section 115 and Jacksonville Beach, FL:
John, do you recall the comment by Aaron Ross that playing in Jacksonville was like taking a one-year vacation? The attitude of some of the current players seems to be on that same level. Not that they think they are on vacation, but that the effort just doesn’t seem to be above par. Too many mental mistakes. Let’s hope the game in Kansas City shows improvement in that area. I’d really like to see them turn this thing around. Go Jags!!

John: I do remember the Ross comment … who could forget? It would be hard to make an argument that the second quarter of the Titans game was a Hallmark of Effort for this team – particularly defensively – but for the most part this season I haven’t seen effort as being an issue. Concentration? Discipline? Focus? Yes, yes, yes – but not effort.

John from Cape May, NJ:
You want people to stop booing? Then play better. Oh … and win.

John: Yes.

Chad from EverBank:
As I understand it, this weekend is not an automatic loss for us. It’ll be tough, but aren’t NFL games supposed to be? The Chiefs have some key players scheduled to be sidelined this week. This is as good a week as any for our team to come together and pull out a win.

John: You know what, Chad? You’re right that it’s not an automatic loss. But I’d be disingenuous to say it’s not one of the toughest tasks of the Gus Bradley era. The Chiefs make few mistakes, and you have to earn victories against them. The Jaguars have struggled in key areas in recent weeks and have done little to nothing to make you think they’re going to change that. It’s exceedingly tough to win at Arrowhead Stadium and pretty much all stories around the Jaguars right now are slanted toward off-field stuff to the degree that it’s hard to imagine there’s not some level of distraction. If the Jaguars win this game, it would be one of the more surprising victories I’ve seen in some time. On the one hand, that means it’s a difficult task. On the other hand, it gives them one more opportunity to come together as a team and pull out an impressive victory. This team hasn’t taken advantage of those sorts of opportunities. Perhaps this weekend will be that time.

Aaron from White Hall, AR:
I’m not saying we are going to win, but I think between Bortles working with his own quarterbacks coach and the new offensive coordinator I feel excited and think we are going to play pretty good.

John: That’s the hope.

Dakota from Dupree, SD:
Zone, more pass rush would really help this defense. Not making stupid personal foul penalties would also really help. The second one is on coaching. How about the first? Someone needs to start getting to the quarterback.

John: I agree that the personal foul penalties must be coached out of this team. Let’s see if that can start Sunday. As for the pass rush, while the defense hasn’t gotten enough pressure, a hu-u-u-u-u-uuge factor in that has been the Jaguars’ inability to get a lead. I don’t think this defense would be putting up legendary sacks numbers if it played with leads, but it’s awfully hard to generate pass rush when the opposing offense isn’t in a situation in which it has to pass.

Royce from Jacksonville:
What is the difference between a struggling quarterback and a bad one?

John: A struggling quarterback figures out why he’s struggling and improves. A bad one doesn’t. Which one is Blake Bortles? Time will tell.

Shawn from Waverly:
Not a question John just my thoughts. I wouldn’t even hire you to taste pies.

John: How fortuitous for both of us. First, no one would give you hiring power – and second, I hate pie.

Logan from Wichita, KS:
Seriously, O-man: other teams may have more wins, but we have you making this O-Zone for us every day. Other teams wish they had something as reliable, long-lasting and entertaining with even half as much information as you put out for us Jags fans. One for O-Zone!

John: Nah.

O-Zone: Star of the parade

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Reginald from Jacksonville:

What do you think Nathaniel Hackett will do differently from Greg Olson and do you think the offense will move the ball better?

John: I think the Jaguars’ offense under Hackett will be significantly more committed to the run and will stick with the run even if it might appear initially it’s not working. The Jaguars believe a greater commitment and “stick-to-it-iveness” is needed in this area – and that the commitment will make a difference. That’s the general vibe. I also think you may see the Jaguars run from different formations than you previously saw this season. I imagine, too, Hackett could mix in up-tempo possessions more quickly than Olson. Will all of that make a difference? Will the Jaguars move the ball better? I suppose I’d say yes – not so much because of anything Olson was or wasn’t doing, but because it would be hard to be worse offensively than the Jaguars have been in the first half in recent weeks.

Dave from Orlando, FL:

Johnny-O, forget about poor throwing mechanics and bad play calling, this teams fortune’s changed the day that the Culligan girl left town.

John: You may have a point – even though I have no idea what you’re talking about.

Rob from Orange Park, FL:

There has to be more to the firing of Olson than Blake/offense playing bad since they promoted the quarterbacks coach. I doubt you are allowed to tell the real story, but there at least has to be some interesting rumors going around. Care to share any of those?

John: The real story is the Jaguars had scored six points in the last three first halves and that the offense wasn’t moving well enough to give the team a chance to win. Jaguars Head Coach Gus Bradley thought some sort of change was needed, and he didn’t see a change happening with Olson as the coordinator. Once he decided that was the move, he promoted Hackett partly because Hackett had NFL play-calling experience. I’ve said often this week that the move feels like a Hail Mary – and that considering how Blake Bortles has played at quarterback this season, I am hard-pressed to tell you what Olson could have or should have done differently. But considering the circumstance, Bradley felt compelled to do something – and this was it. I understand the need to find the conspiracy and the inside story, but this was a case of Bradley wanting to do something – anything – to fix an offense that by any measure has been stagnant. Hopefully for all involved it will work.

Marcus from Jacksonville:

Is it time for fans to start paying more attention to the national media coverage of the Jags? For years we’ve been upset about how the national media has slighted the Jaguars, but they seem to be the ones that have been right more often than not. I know the local media “knows” the team better, but in terms of predicting the direction of the team, they’ve been terrible. It was the national media that still had a question mark on Blake Bortles while the local media was prepping the display case for his inevitable MVP trophy. It was the national media who repeatedly has had the Jags at or near the bottom of the league and division while the local media has trumpeted .500 with a possible playoff push. Is it time we start believing more of what we hear from them rather than the local guys and gals?

John: Many national analysts believed the Jaguars would contend for a playoff spot and an AFC South title this season – in fact, that was kind of an offseason theme. Some local analysts – myself included – predicted closer to 9-7 or 7-9. I said repeatedly I believed the defense would be at the very least OK and that the key to the season was whether or not the offense and specifically Bortles made some very difficult Year-2-to-Year-3 improvements. That doesn’t make me any sort of visionary … but it does mean I could use a rub down because patting yourself on the back can be rough on the soft tissue … but sure, listen to the national guys if you want. Considering what predictions are actually worth, theirs are as good as any.

David from Orlando, FL:

O-man, the No. 1 thing the Jags’ organization needs to determine for the rest of this season is if Blake Bortles is “the man.” We’re not going to determine this by coddling him, by having him dink and dunk it down the field. I speak for EVERY Jags fan when I say we would rather go down in a blaze of glory than a whimper and with our tail between our legs. In the words of one wise sage (Petey Prisco), you’ve got to set Blake free, and let the chips fall where they may.

John: OK.

Cir-Ike Love At the Edge:

John-O, I’m on the edge looking over; it’s not a pretty sight. I don’t want to abandon ship. I’m so close, John. Talk me off this ledge. What can I expect from this Jagtanic (see what I did there) the rest of the year???

John: Whoa! First off: step back, Cir-Ike. We sure don’t need you slipping. Second, while it has looked bad in recent weeks – and while Sunday’s game looks like a very difficult matchup – all hope is not lost. Things are usually not as bad as they look in the NFL – and teams usually follow up bad losses with better performances and even unpredicted victories. That’s not giving you a lot, but until the Jaguars show more, that’s what I got.

Otto from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:

John, Brandon Allen has a very good arm and throws a beautiful spiral. He has excellent football acumen. He is a coach’s son. About six weeks ago you implied not yet for him. If not now, why not? Blake has a head problem at the present. What do we have to lose? Thanks.

John: What you have to lose is in your scenario is Blake Bortles as a potential franchise quarterback. If you’re ready to put Bortles completely in the past tense, then start Allen. Until then, don’t.

David from Duval:

You want answers? You want the truth? I’ll give you the truth. It hit me like a ton of bricks when Malik Jackson was on the radio Tuesday sharing his cerebral wisdom. The dumb penalties. The players calling out fans. The way they perform on the road when you need mental toughness. This in no way describes every individual on the team – and I’m not saying these guys are dumb – but there are too many weak-minded, immature, young adults on this team and that is our identity. That is Jaguar football right now. Your thoughts Johnny?

John: I haven’t dug deep into this whole player-fan-whose-right-whose-wrong-who-said-what thing because, frankly, there’s not much digging to do. I’ve said repeatedly that fans have every right to boo and that players have every right to not like it. Players also have every right to complain about it – but if they do, it will never, ever, ever, EVER be received well by fans. This is why I don’t delve into it much: because the story has the same ending every time and no one ever seems to come out on the other end happy. I honestly haven’t seen a booing-complaining story linger on as long as this one, but the disappointment/disillusion around this season is pretty high right now. None of this in my opinion truly reflects on the “character” of the players in the locker room, and I honestly don’t believe it’s a sign that players don’t like the fans. They don’t like getting booed and they perhaps unwisely and unfortunately commented on the matter. Bottom line? A few victories would cure a lot of ills – but I suppose that’s true of a lot around this organization right now.

Daniel from Honolulu, HI:

Hey John, are you concerned that this will be Blake’s third offensive coordinator in as many years? I don’t think this is the right way for a developing young quarterback.

John: It’s not ideal. Then again, ideal pulled out of the station a while back.

James from Yulee, FL:

Here’s a crazy statement. I have a feeling Blake is quite the opposite of what people think of him. I think he’s very smart. I also think when he can go to the line of scrimmage and have more freedom to call plays I think you’ll see Blake just like in two-minute play well and excel. Just a feeling and I hope I am right. He’s that kind of quarterback. He wants to have fun and play the game. Take the training wheels off and just let the kid play the game.

John: I’ve said often in recent weeks that I’d be reluctant to give a struggling quarterback more freedom at the line. I’d be surprised if that’s the route that Hackett takes. But perhaps he’ll shock us all and let Bortles and the offense play two-minute offense the entire game. Perhaps the Jaguars will win by 50 points and I’ll be proven an idiot. If so, I’d be the happ-, happ-, happiest idiot in the Thanksgiving parade.

O-Zone: Oh, wait

JACKSONVILLE – Ah, Look-Ahead Wednesday …

‘Tis a glorious day each week in the O-Zone, a day when the past magically disappears, a day when we look ahead to the Jaguars’ future.

So it is on this day that we put the events of Tennessee last Thursday in the rearview and look ahead to Kansas City. It was an ugly night in Nashville, one that led to a midseason offensive-coordinator change – and a slew of angry days in the inbox.

Indeed, your senior writer took some punches in the last few days. So did Shadrick and Sexton – not to mention the guy who sits in the office next to mine who is absolutely invaluable and whose name I swear to learn soon.

And you know what? We all came out OK – me, Sexton, Shadrick … even the guy. This, too, shall pass. It’s still the NFL season. Nine games remain. Plenty of storylines remain, too. Can new offensive coordinator Nathaniel Hackett boost the offense? Can he boost quarterback Blake Bortles? Can a Bortles boost in turn boost a bunch of other things?

Somewhere in those questions are the key storylines to the rest of the season. I suppose we’ll start finding some answers this week.

And about that week … it’s a week with a football game at the end of it. That’s better than the alternative, right?

Let’s get to it …

Kris from Neenah, WI:
I’m a fan, so I get it: losing sucks. We have lost for a long time. However, it seems like in every email you get these people are implying the Jaguars’ organization is not trying to improve and could care less. Fans gonna fan I guess.

John: Are fans fanning? Darned right they are – and fans absolutely, positively have the right to be historically, monumentally, mind-blowingly angry at what has transpired the past couple of weeks. The loss to Oakland? Bad. The Tennessee loss? I don’t know how to describe that level of bad. But if there indeed is a perception that the organization doesn’t care, that perception couldn’t be more inaccurate. The primary factor creating said perception seems to be Owner Shad Khan’s commitment to Head Coach Gus Bradley – and there certainly are fans who believe changing the head coach would solve all that ails this team. But remember: It is the job of Khan and Jaguars leadership to balance short-term calls for action with the long-term big picture. Decisions made for the good of the long term aren’t always popular in the short term, but it doesn’t mean those making the decisions aren’t trying – or caring. And to think that Khan and Jaguars leadership aren’t trying or caring is to be so far from reality as to be beyond the point of comprehension. They care, and they’re as frustrated as those doing the fanning these days. That doesn’t help ease the disappointment, but it is the truth.

Sean from Calder, NC:
The time the Jaguars need to become a very competitive football team is directly related to how well Bortles can recover from whatever is going on. One good year does not make a good quarterback. Whether he is the next Josh Freeman or Drew Brees will determine the success of the franchise. Always the quarterback …

John: Yes.

Jeremy from Jacksonville:
I’ve never watched a Nathaniel Hackett interview before but that guy has energy. Whatever happens, that guy made me smile.

John: Hackett indeed is an energetic guy. The Jaguars need that energy to infuse life into this offense – and into Bortles. Players seem confident it can play out that way. Will that confidence automatically glean yardage and points? No, but the confidence can’t hurt.

Don from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:
Peyton Manning had a fast pace in his offense. Blake Bortles needs an offense that works with his style and tempo. Let him do what he does well. Being safe and predictable is not his style. Let it rip and believe in it and everything will work out. The team still has its health and nine games to go. Things change all the time! Who knows what can happen? Get mad and get even!

John: I’m hesitant to bang the table for a game plan that calls for a struggling quarterback to “let it rip” and play up-tempo, and I don’t think that will be the approach. I think it’s more likely the Jaguars reemphasize the running game. Either way, I like the enthusiasm – and the exclamation points!

Keith from Sunny St. Augie:
Three OCs, two DCs … something tells me it’s not just the coordinators.

John: Of course not. It’s never “just” any one thing in the NFL.

Brian from Atlanta, GA:
It seems like tackling and offensive line play has gotten worse with less contact in practice and practice time overall. When they made the change, they did it for player health, which seems understandable, but it seems like there are just as many injuries as ever. I don’t want to argue against player safety, but I think the NFL may have overcorrected a problem.

John: I agree that the lack of practice time has hurt tackling and line play, though I associate the drop in line play more with the advent of spread offenses at the college level. Either way, don’t look for return to the “old days.” The current practice rules were negotiated in the 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement, and adding practice time isn’t something the players association likely will approve.

Zeleznoc from Orange Park:
While I fully understand Khan’s reasoning in not wanting to change staff in mid-year, I am also concerned that fans are giving up and he’s losing the fan base. Following the numerous bad years and promise of things to come that have failed to materialize, the water-cooler talk I hear suggests the team is slowly losing its fan base. Do you think this is a concern and how difficult would it be to regain fan support? Do you think Khan is concerned about Jag fans and losing support?

John: Of course Khan is concerned about Jaguars fans. To think otherwise is to completely misunderstand the situation. Khan wants to win. He wants to win because NFL owners want to win, and he wants to win because of this fan base. As for regaining fan support, that’s simple: win.

Renee from Duval:
John! So, I have decided that I’m going to be positive. Can Bortles find his MoJo? Can this offense turn a 180? Can the defense be good or even possibly great? The answer is … wait for it … yes. YES! How? First, don’t believe your press. Second, work your tail off. And third, do right by your team. I truly believe we have talent and I saw signs of the Xs and Os working. We may be low right now but the pendulum is swinging. Guess what it is going up! Jacksonville Do you believe in Miracles? I do John I do. GO JAGS!

John: #DTWD

Logan from Wichita, KS:
You know what, Zone. At least if we don’t have the best team in the NFL, we do have the best O-Zone in the NFL.

John: Yes, I am No. 1 out of … oh.

O-Zone: Reliable sources

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Logan from Wichita, KS:
How can you say we are any closer to a better team than four years ago? Last I checked we were 2-5 and on the verge of our seventh Top 10 pick in a row. The talent honestly can’t be better because it’s not showing. Dante Fowler Jr. clearly lost a step in his speed and skills, Malik Jackson is not worth the price tag, Tashaun Gibson has shown he is not capable of changing games, Blake Bortles is going downhill fast, the Allen brothers have not shown they can repeat good seasons, this O-line is terrible – and other than that, this team is really mediocre at best. Come on, just fess up: We won’t be good for AT LEAST another five years at this rate.

John: I guess I say the Jaguars are closer to a better team than four years ago for a pretty simple reason: I believe they are a more talented roster than they were four years ago. This is not to say they are a team of experienced, veteran, mature players at all positions – because that’s clearly not the case. This also is not to say they are a good team – because 2-5 teams are not good teams. But there are far more positions with capable players than was the case four years ago. And while this is not a week to laud specific players, I will say that Fowler’s issues center around maturity more than skill set, that Jackson’s significantly more worthy than your email indicates, that the Allen brothers are more capable as well and that the offensive line is actually pass blocking well despite its run blocking … but as I said, the wake of Thursday’s ugly loss is not a time when anything looks or feels or smells or tastes good. As for my confession … while there’s no way I thought this team would be 2-5 after seven games there also is no way this team will need five years to be competitive. Not even close.

David from Broward County:
O-Man, in response to Jason from PA asking about Brandon Allen you said, “That does not mean he yet knows fundamentals and NFL basics – or that he is ready in terms of grasp of the offense – well enough to start in the NFL.” This very much describes how BB5 looks right now. I’m not saying you pull BB5 now, but you have to be prepared to do that very soon, and putting Henne in would be the wrong move. You start seriously getting Allen ready – tough given the CBA – but you have to do it, and be ready to pull BB5 soon if this lost, clueless, bad play continues. Leaving BB5 in to continue playing in this manner would surely ruin him more than sitting him down. Your thoughts?

John: I think let’s see what the next few weeks bring.

Jarrod from Chicago, IL:
ESPN referred to Bortles as a “basket case” and that the locker room has lost all faith in him. Have you sensed that from the team at all?

John: I sense a quarterback who’s having a remarkably difficult season and who appears to be going through the expected, understandable crisis of confidence that goes along with that. I see a locker room of teammates that knows that quarterback can play well because they have seen him do so – but that also is expectedly frustrated with losing. As for lost faith … I’m never sure how to gauge that. I sense Bortles’ offensive teammates are not as confident as a group as they were last season and it stands to reason that Bortles’ play is part of that. I also sense that a few productive games – or even a few productive series – would make a lot of things better in a hurry.

Mike from Section 238:
What are the CBA limits on how much one-on-one on-field instruction a quarterback can get between one Sunday game to the next during the season?

John: One-on-one time is not specifically limited by the CBA, so a player could theoretically receive one-on-one instruction any day except the players’ off day (usually Tuesday). But players are in meetings, walkthroughs, film study and practice on Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday – a schedule that severely limits time for one-on-one, mechanic/fundamental-oriented work. That’s what makes the offseason – particularly the time between the regular season and the beginning of the official offseason program – so important.

Paul from San Antonio, TX:
Hey O, so new OC and the rest of the schedule is gonna be tough except for a few games that we could win. Where do we go from here?

John: Kansas City.

Sam from Jacksonville:
O, I was able to enjoy multiple games Sunday without worrying about the dumpster fire that is my Jags. The thing that really strikes me is … so many NFL offenses have an obvious rhythm and smoothness to them from play to play. I can’t remember the last time my Jags looked like that. It’s so disheartening.

John: It indeed has been too long since the Jaguars have had a rhythm offensively. Offensive rhythm more often than not is reserved for teams with consistent quarterbacks functioning at a high level. Even when Blake Bortles was playing well last season he was rarely efficient and before that … so, yeah, it has been a while.

Mike from Jacksonville:
Blake Bortles does not have an NFL arm. Derek Carr has the velocity to make the tight coverage throws. David Caldwell has blown this one. What say?

John: I say that right now Carr looks better than Bortles. With Carr playing as he has played this season and Bortles playing the way he has played this season it would be foolish to say otherwise. It didn’t look nearly as clearly that way at the end of last season. If nothing changes, then yeah … it’s probably accurate to say Caldwell missed on the selection. Bortles obviously needs to fix some significant things in terms of mechanics and performance. If he can’t, then it’s a bad thing and he may have a short career as a starter. If he can, then we’ll all be revisiting this question.

Travis from Boynton Beach, FL:
O man, how are fans piling it on Bortles? The same guy moving the ball in the third and fourth quarter when defenses are playing prevent is the same guy passing for double-digit yards in the first half in consecutive games. Don’t get me wrong: I want Blake to be “The Guy,” but right now he only looks like that guy when the game is out of hand.

John: Yes, that’s how he looks – and it’s how he looked at times last year. When I said people are piling on Bortles a bit, I included myself as much as anyone. What I meant was there is a lot going wrong right now – and it’s truly not all Bortles. But is his play troubling right now, and it is a focal point when discussing reasons the Jaguars are struggling.

Mike from Jacksonville:
O, can you please explain why we must continue to be humiliated by former Jaguar coaches and players who go on to other teams, beat us and have better records as coaches and players of other teams? What’s a fan to do? For the last several years we have attend three games each season as a small and affordable way to support our team. However given our worsening record, we are giving serious thought to pulling the plug next year and just watching the games on TV. We will stick by our Jaguars but the excuses have run out. It is time for an honest and comprehensive evaluation of the Jaguars that incorporates the history of all levels of the people who are and have been in positions of responsibility with the Jaguars- top to bottom. What went right? What went wrong? Why are we not progressing in a positive direction? Sort of like an independent auditor. What say ye? Your continued candor is appreciated.

John: I say Shad Khan now has owned the Jaguars for nearly five years. I say he’s a remarkably intelligent man. I say when he makes decisions regarding the future of this franchise he will make them based on his experience, his research and his increasing knowledge of the NFL. And I say that’s how an intelligent owner should make decisions.

Travis from High Springs, FL:
Hi John. No question here. Just wanted to say I just read an article on another website about three trades the Jags should make before the deadline. One was trade Allen Robinson to the Cowboys for an offensive lineman, two was trade Blake Bortles to Cleveland for their first-round pick in the draft, don’t even remember the third. Just wanted to say that everyone may not always like your answers on the O-Zone but thanks for making statements that are informative, intelligent and at least based in reality.

John: It’s not always easy or even possible to be correct, but it’s quite possible to be more accurate and based in reality than the article you cite.

O-Zone: Unanswerable question

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Greg from Arlington, VA:

How much blame does Nathaniel Hackett get for Bortles’ mechanics regressing so much from last season to this season? How could he not see Blake Bortles‘ windup looking so pitiful and not doing anything about it? Very concerning for me.

John: A couple of thoughts here: One is that while a quarterback coach’s job does involve mechanics, identifying a mechanical problem doesn’t mean having a quarterback who is able to fix the problem. More pertinently, it also does not mean having time to fix the problem. Remember that under the current Collective Bargaining Agreement coaches are limited in how much time they have with players – and most of that time for quarterbacks is spent on execution, game-planning and practicing as opposed to working on mechanics. Tweaking and honing mechanics must take place before organized team activities begin, which is why Bortles worked with Tom House in California so extensively in the 2015 offseason. The most important thing to remember, though, is that Bortles’ mechanics have nothing to do with Hackett’s ability to game plan and call offensive plays. One has nothing to do the other – and how someone fares at one is no indication of how they will perform at the other.

Erik from Jacksonville:

Johnny-O, the difference between the Titans game and the other losses is that I felt nothing as I watched. Emotionless. I didn’t yell, cuss or throw my hands up in disbelief. I absolutely expected the loss – though not as bad as it was. I have mentally checked out for the season. It’s simply not fun anymore to watch or go to games. I am not alone.

John: I know.

Sam from Jacksonville:

O, thanks for all you do. My Cubs are in the World Series … the quarterback for my alma mater plays for the Bucs … and my remaining season tickets are on Stub Hub. I’ll check back in after Black Monday. The Jags will be lucky to win four games this year and I can’t take it anymore. I’ve reached the point of apathy … I never thought I’d get here.

John: I believe the Jaguars will win more than four games this season, though I can’t blame you for disagreeing. I also can’t blame you for apathy. That’s because it’s not up to you to avoid that feeling; it’s up to the team – and the team hasn’t played well enough to make you avoid it. There’s no rule that says the team can’t start playing better and make you feel better about the rest of the season. We’ll see if it does that.

Chad from Jacksonville:

Start Brandon Allen.

John: We’re not there yet.

Taylor from Maryland:

So if Bradley can change his mind and make a coaching change, then so can Khan, right?

John: Yes, though I don’t believe he will.

Mike from Middleburg, FL:

I agree with our coaching style – staying positive – but do you agree that we need to open up a can of whip a## to get things back on track?

John: I’m not a big believer that whip a## is needed to be a good head coach, but considering the unsportsmanlike conduct penalties that continue to occur, something is needed. The Jaguars pulled Dante Fowler Jr. out for the remainder of the first half after a second-quarter penalty Thursday. He has had a lot of silly penalties this season. Perhaps that’s a start.

Bill from Folkston, GA:

Do you think that putting Bortles in so soon in his first season has been a detriment to his development as a quarterback? Along with that I ask, did we do the same thing to Blaine Gabbert? Both have been put in behind substandard offensive lines and have taken a heavy toll on sacks. Do you think that possibly both had the potential to become much better than what they have?

John: No. In particular reference to Bortles, I never got the impression the past two seasons that he was suffering from any sort of heavy toll of being sacked too much. And he actually has struggled more this season playing behind a line this season that has pass blocked far better than it did in his previous two seasons.

John from Jacksonville:

What was it about Bortles that Caldwell liked that he didn’t like in Carr?

John: Potential, size, mobility, intangibles, upside – mostly upside.

Bruce from Freehold, NJ:

Someday we’ll look back on this and it will all seem funny … Nah, it’s total darkness on the edge of town.

John: Stay cool tonight, Eddie.

Tony from Jacksonville:

OK, so our defense gives up 354 yards in the first half and is playing worse than last year in spite of a huge talent upgrade, and we fire the offensive coordinator? Our quarterback regresses badly this year, and in your words is the single biggest issue with our team, and his position coach gets promoted? Smells like scapegoat to me.

John: I understand why you’re picking up that odor, and certainly any midseason coaching change has a tendency to take on that aroma. The Jaguars reached a point where something evidently needed to be tried. This is what they’re trying. It’s not the ideal option, but when you’re changing coordinators midseason it’s safe to say you’re past the point of ideal situations.

Clarence in Section 124 and Fort Worth, TX:

Is it possible for Bortles to improve his footwork and accuracy in the offseason or is it too late? I was also wondering if his throws are off because his arm may be tired or hurt.

John: Yes it’s possible to improve those things in the offseason. Bortles in fact improved those things in the 2015 offseason – though they seem to have regressed this season. It’s not my impression that his arm is tired or hurt, though that doesn’t mean it’s not.

Jason from Lancaster, PA:

O-Zone, can you let us readers know your thoughts on Brandon Allen? How does he look in practice, mechanics … accuracy, etc.? What are the differences between him and Blake?

John: My thoughts on Brandon Allen have been gleaned from organized team activities, training camp and preseason because we don’t see practice during the regular season. He has arm talent and throws a good-looking ball. He at times looked better in terms of spiral and velocity than Bortles; but spiral and velocity aren’t the NFL end-all. He appears to have a lot of positives, and I know the team very much likes his potential. That does not mean he yet knows fundamentals and NFL basics – or that he is ready in terms of grasp of the offense – well enough to start in the NFL.

Randolph from the Depths of O’Har:

I find it difficult to understand the piling on of Blake Bortles. Sure, he’s been inconsistent, and downright gun shy at points. However, he is the only bit of offense thus far. It’s him in the third and fourth quarter making things happen. With zero run game, and defenses having adapted to the Jags long ball threat, we are clearly a team with a very incomplete offense. I don’t understand how the majority of the offensive woes are placed on Blake’s shoulders. What say you, All Mighty O?

John: I agree that there has been some piling on of Blake Bortles – and without question I’ve been guilty of that here in the O-Zone. The Jaguars indeed have struggled in the run game and that is not all on Bortles. Still, the current NFL depends on the passing game executing at a certain competitive level. The Jaguars’ passing game, particularly in the last two weeks, hasn’t done that. Some of that has been receivers dropping passes, but the biggest factor has been Bortles’ inaccuracy and decision-making. It’s probably accurate to say those issues have gotten more play than any other issue facing the Jaguars, but the NFL is a quarterback-driven league. When that position is struggling it’s front-page stuff and nothing else makes the front page.

Kyle from Jacksonville:

So how long do we have to wait until we get a winning team? Every year we hear “this team is getting better. Wins will come. We are close. We are close.” I’m sick of the “just wait your turn” shtick. When will it finally be our turn? I’m really sick of waiting.

John: This is a common feeling among Jaguars fans and an understandable one. It’s also of course an unanswerable question. Many teams in NFL history have gone through long periods of losing and frustration. The Jaguars are in the midst of one that unfortunately compares to some bad, memorable eras. It’s difficult because losing stinks and it often seems as if the down cycle will last forever – or, as if there is no way out. This is not the case. It’s hard for people to see positives about the Jaguars right now, but the biggest positive is the roster is improved from four years ago. The climb from where the Jaguars are now to respectability is not nearly as long or arduous as it was four years ago. That doesn’t mean the Jaguars will make that climb in any certain amount of time because the NFL is not scripted television and there are no guarantees. But it does mean there is more hope than four years ago – even if that hope is tough to see right now.

O-Zone: Full analysis

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Trevor from Jacksonville:
Greg Olson. Fired.

John: This was a common sentiment in the inbox Saturday, and I get it. Many readers had focused on offensive coordinator Greg Olson as the reason for the Jaguars’ issues this season – and the team indeed parted ways with Olson on Saturday and replaced him with quarterbacks coach Nathaniel Hackett. I long have said I’m not given to a midseason coordinator or head coaching change because it’s usually change for change’s sake – and because such changes often produce little long-term gain. Hackett is very smart and very capable of running the offense, but I am skeptical Saturday’s move will have an earth-shaking impact on the offense. That has nothing to do with Hackett and everything to do with being skeptical that what ails the offense – quarterback Blake Bortles’ struggles and the offensive line’s struggles to run block – will be magically fixed. At the same time, the Jaguars’ offense had reached a point where nothing was working. The unit scored six first-half points in the past three games and the performance in a 60-yard, zero-points first half against Tennessee Thursday clearly had the effect of frustrating players on both sides of the ball. Maybe this move is change for the sake of change, but – as many readers have noted – there seems little harm to the team in changing. Perhaps the change will yield earth-shaking results. Perhaps it will spur players to respond. Perhaps Hackett will find something to help Bortles regain confidence. That’s certainly possible. Here’s hoping for the sake of this offense, the franchise and the quarterback that it happens. The aforementioned group and anyone associated with the Jaguars sure would think that was cool. They would like it.

Hank from St. Augustine, FL:
Gus Bradley said Friday he planned no staff changes. You wrote on Saturday there would be no changes. On Saturday, the Jaguars fired Olson and promoted Hackett. What happened?

John: Bradley changed his mind.

Scotty from Points North:
Sometimes, the fans are right. Sometimes, the pros are wrong. I think the Jag fans had this scented out a long time ago with Gus Bradley. I think it is unfortunate because I think we all hate to start over. As far as Blake Bortles goes, I think we all fear a prolonged rehash of the Blaine Gabbert situation were the organization keeps giving him more and more time to prove himself at the cost of the team. I want Bortles to be the man but I don’t want this to drag into the next season. Full disclosure … I looked at the draft boards for next year about a month ago. Never too early for a Jags fan. Thanks.

John: Many fans indeed gave up on Gus Bradley long ago. Many just as certainly did not. Many pros gave up on Gus Bradley a while back. Many did not. As far as Bortles … sure, it’s fair to fear that the Jaguars are traveling a road right now where they must give a young, highly-drafted quarterback a chance to prove whether or not he’s the guy. That’s the deal when you draft quarterbacks early. They must be given time to prove if they’re the guy. The signs haven’t been good the last two weeks. They were better last year. Which are right? The rest of the season could determine the answer.

CJ from Singapore:
Ok John, I’ve been a fan since the expansion year and I’ll admit this is by far the hardest year to remain a fan. I can’t think of a time more depressing for a true JAGS fan. Can you please tell me a time in Jaguars history when coaching change was needed more than now? The lack of discipline and accountability is embarrassing.

John: This is a brutally tough season so far – and indeed, the masses are expectedly roaring about coaching. And that roar has reached deafening levels. But that roar gets deafening whenever teams lose and whenever fan bases grow weary of a team’s direction. I won’t argue the fact that the Jaguars’ discipline on the field has been troubling this season. The unsportsmanlike-conduct penalties point to that. If the season continues in this vein, I can’t imagine changes won’t be made. Nine games remain. Time will tell.

Jeff from Rutland, MA:
I wish there was even one credible reason to believe this team could do better in any of the nine remaining games. There isn’t.

John: The way the Jaguars have played the last two weeks makes this point difficult to argue. What needs to happen to make the Jaguars play better? Improvement at the quarterback position would be a start. Improved run blocking would help, too. If those areas could have some success early in games and give the team a chance to play with a lead, it’s my belief that the Jaguars’ defense is more than capable of playing well throughout an entire game. That combination could move this team a lot closer to being competitive. This didn’t remotely happen Thursday but it has happened enough that it’s not insane to think it could happen again. It’s very difficult to win scoring two points per half offensively. That has been the Jaguars’ offensive production in the last three games. If that improves, everything else will look much better. Will it happen? I can’t predict that. If it doesn’t, it’s going to be a long nine weeks.

Bill from Hawthorn Woods, IL:
O … I heard the press conference. I hear what Coach Bradley is saying. What I don’t get is why we – and in this ‘we’ I’m including you and media more broadly in addition to the fans – are expected to buy into the CoachSpeak stuff? It never has been converted to action on any level of consistency or sustainability. I’m starting to tune it all out and becoming a bit apathetic. I fear I am far from alone.

John: There’s little any coach can say in a press conference to inspire confidence if results aren’t happening on the field. A press conference is by definition “talk” and therefore words. Action is what happens on the field. Actions speak louder than words.

Zach from Baltimore, MD:
I’m giving you a shot here. For the fans, can you make a valid point that Blake Bortles stats are not inflated because of garbage time/prevent defense?

John: Not in the last two weeks. As for last season, his statistics indeed were partly compiled late in one-sided games, but by no means were all of them overly inflated. He wasn’t great last season. He needed to improve entering this season. Those things are true, but to paint all of last season as being worthless and inflated is incorrect.

Jacob from North Carolina:
Too soon for draft. Too late for this season. No head coach changes. So, what do you think? Over or under: we win two more games.

John: Over.

Emile from Tallahassee, FL:
I’m not the oldest guy you’ll meet and I’m sure there are many people who’ve watched more football than me. However: I’ve seen a few good, franchise quarterbacks go through slumps – that’s not what this looks like to me.

John: No, this does not look like a slump. This at best looks like a young quarterback still finding his way and needing serious work on throwing motion and mechanics This at worse feels like a young quarterback who won’t develop into a franchise quarterback. Because of the last two games many believe it’s the latter. It’s up to him to prove it’s the former.

Ross from Fleming Island, FL:
More of a thought as opposed to a question. I do not expect Mr. Khan to make a change midseason. He is a brilliant businessman that realizes his product is failing. Instead of a knee-jerk reaction, I expect he is working on a plan to make changes, and will patiently wait (though painfully) to execute his plan when he believes it is in place and the time is right. I believe he hates losing as much as every Jags fan everywhere (maybe more), but he will approach this rationally. What says you?

John: I say you’re right. I don’t know that that means Khan absolutely has decided to make changes, but there’s little question he has a plan.

David from Jacksonville:
John, I can’t help but think if only we had beaten Green Bay we would be looking at a completely different season right now.

John: When the Washington Redskins lost to the Chicago Bears 73-0 in the 1940 NFL Championship Game, Redskins quarterback Sammy Baugh was asked if the outcome would have been any different had a Redskins player not dropped a touchdown pass early in the game. Baugh said it would have been different. The score would have been 73-7. Had the Jaguars won against the Packers they would be 3-4. Would that make the last two games feel different or changed their outcome? I can’t say that.

Shawn from the Lost:
Full analysis and tell us all the answers. GO!

John: ….

O-Zone: Somehow, someway

JACKSONVILLE – And so we move on.

We enter the weekend with the Jaguars 2-5 and the inbox in an uproar. Considering the result Thursday in Tennessee, that’s understandable.

We’ll say here what we’ve said the past few days: what’s going on is not acceptable, and it’s not pretty. Can the Jaguars find a way out of it? That remains to be seen. Nine games remain in this season. Something needs to happen or those are going to be nine long weeks.

We’ll try not to make this an all-Gus-Bradley-all-Blake-Bortles weekend. Considering the circumstances, there may not be an alternative.

Let’s get to it …

Howard from Jacksonville :
Why won’t we give Brandon Allen a shot? We know what we have in Chad Henne, so no need there. We will never be able to run the ball if the defense does not respect the quarterback. Bench Bortles and by default running game may improve!

John: The Jaguars haven’t benched Bortles because they have seen enough in Bortles to believe he can develop into a quality NFL quarterback. If he is benched it becomes unlikely he ever will develop into such a player for this franchise. The way Bortles has played in recent weeks has caused many to question his future, but for now the Jaguars must support him and believe.

Bill from Folkston, GA:
I see Shad Khan has stated that he will not fire the coach. OK, it is his team. Do you think it is time to sit Bortles? Even when he has time to throw, he has that deer-in-the-headlights look and he cannot throw a short pass accurately at all. Now, he can’t throw the long ball, either. He says it isn’t a confidence problem; then it must be a talent problem. To continue like they are is just driving this team further and further into the ground and driving fans away. Some change has to be made because it is apparent that this idea of fixing Bortles to fix the problem isn’t working. At least try Chad Henne; it couldn’t be any worse.

John: Never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever say it couldn’t be any worse.

Sebastian from Austin, TX:
O, I’m with the rest of the 100 percent of Jaguars fans still left. I’m disgusted, hopeless and resigned but I have to ask: Taking into consideration your years of experience around football, when there’s not one thing wrong and it truly feels like everything is failing, is there any chance something just clicks and the team starts to execute better and win – or does it truly takes months off and an offseason to start over fresh and right the ship?

John: Every situation is different. There have been situations in which 2-5, struggling teams indeed right the ship and even make the postseason. This does not feel like one of those situations, but those situations never feel savable until they are saved. What will it take for it to click? It must start with better quarterback play. That’s not to say that is all that’s going wrong. Not even close. The defensive effort and performance Thursday was questionable at best and bad at worst – and there are ongoing discipline issues. There also is the ongoing issue with the team’s run blocking. Still, it’s a quarterback-driven league. When the position isn’t functioning very little around it can function, either.

Dave from Los Angeles, CA:
I suppose it’s time for a full reappraisal of the rebuild project. Lately I’ve been leaning toward coaching being the problem – as in, Gus must go – but Dave can stay as he has generally built a talented roster (though quarterback now appears to be a huge issue). Thursday was dumbfounding. Are we sure Dave has built a talented roster? We keep saying we have a lot of talent, but talented players do not get blown out like that. Or is it mental? Has Dave assembled a physically-talented roster that somehow lacks the psychological/emotional strength to compete? How can a fully rebuilt roster in Year 4 play identically to the scrubs on the field in Year 1? Sorry for the rant. I’ll take your comments off the air.

John: When teams play as the Jaguars did Thursday everything gets called into question. I believe this is a more talented roster than Year 1 – or 2013, if you will. I believe it showed that in the first five games of the season. Frankly, so much is going wrong right now that it’s hard to pinpoint a reason. I believe the offense’s struggles are reaching the point where it is eroding a lot of other good things around it. I believe coaching has been an increasing issue in terms of discipline this season, and while that surprises me, something absolutely must be done to stop that being an issue. Mostly I believe that as bad as a lot of things look right now a lot could get solved with more efficient quarterbacking. It’s not the end-all and it hasn’t been the primary issue for four seasons. But it’s a glaring one right now.

JV from West Des Moines, IA:
John, please tell me what Shad expects for the rest of this season. To put it another way, how on earth does keeping Gus Bradley around for the next nine games benefit the team? It feels like there’s rock bottom, and then there’s what we saw Thursday. Just feels like something HAS to be done or it’s going to hurt the fan base.

John: This is a question I’m getting a lot. The benefit of keeping Bradley is there is little evidence historically of mid-season coaching changes making a tangible difference. That means that if there’s a chance of salvaging this season then that chance rests on stability. It’s clear Khan wants the organizational philosophy to be one of stability, and midseason coaching changes are the hallmark of unstable organizations. The cynical among us may state that 2-5 franchises that get blown out on national television while getting outgained 354-60 in first halves aren’t exactly rock solid in terms of stability, and it would be hard to argue that point right now with the cynical types. But the bottom line is that’s the reasoning for staying the course. A mid-season coaching change might have a short-term positive effect, but it likely wouldn’t be lasting. That’s the reasoning. Feel about it how you will.

Aaron from Duval:
You change coaches because this team has absolutely quit, John. You change coaches to see what you have in the players on the roster the rest of the season. You change coaches to give the fans any glimmer of hope going into next season. If you think carrying this momentum into next season and simply a new head coach and draft in the offseason will sell tickets I’m speechless. This franchise is at the point of losing diehard fans. Changing coaches may not alter the win-loss record for the season but giving us the same garbage every week and saying it’s fine is just disrespectful and embarrassing to people who spend their dollars and time supporting this franchise.

John: This is the other side of the coaching conversation. The points are valid. Readers are as upset and disillusioned, and understandably so. The product on the field hasn’t been good enough, and to follow up the Raiders performance with the Titans performance? Well, you used the word “embarrassing.” That fits.

Chris from Palatka, FL:
John, has this team quit on Gus? Do you think “they STILL believe in victory?”

John: It obviously hasn’t looked good on this front the past two weeks. It appears we have nine games to find out for sure.

MrPadre from Kingsland, GA:
John, I’m much more worried about the lack of effort than I am the lack of ability. After the loss to the Raiders at home … with their beloved head coach’s job seemingly in the balance – AND a pep talk from their Owner – they go out and look as if they aren’t even trying and worse … like they don’t even care!? How can professional athletes paid millions to “do their job” show that kind of apathetic performance? I’m sure this isn’t true but it dang near looked like they were “trying” to get their coach fired!

John: You’re right that the players weren’t trying to get Bradley fired, but I can’t argue how it looked – and I can’t argue that it appeared there was a lack of focus or effort at times. Something was undoubtedly lacking. That’s how it looked. Why did it look like that? I wish I knew.

Mike from Atlanta, GA:
I’m at a loss for words. What does a successful 2016 season look like at this point?

John: A successful season right now would be going 8-8. That would mean winning six of nine games. It would also help if the Jaguars got good quarterback play and went through the final nine games with no wheels-are-off moments. There must be progress. Somehow, some way. That’s what’s necessary. There has been little indication in the last two weeks of such a turnaround, but that doesn’t mean it can’t happen.

O-Zone Late Night: Titans 36, Jaguars 22

NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Wow. That was disturbing.

How else to describe what happened to the Jaguars in Tennessee Thursday night? The Jaguars lost to the Titans, 36-22, at Nissan Stadium and it didn’t seem that close.

Most of the questions in the in-box focus on Jaguars Head Coach Gus Bradley’s job security. Many fans want change. I understand that; it’s very understandable in the wake of a 2-5 start that isn’t remotely living up to expectations.

A one-sided loss on national television in the manner that the Jaguars lost on Thursday is the sort of loss that often leads to change. Will that change come? I do not know.

I do know what happened Thursday was bad, disturbing and ugly at times.

I’ll answer questions best I can. I doubt many answers will satisfy. Apologies in advance.

Let’s get to it …

Tommy from Corona, CA:

This is unbelievably pathetic. Looks like the ’76 Bucs. I love Gus, but this is Keystone Cops stuff. I am in shock.

John: Frankly, I am a bit shocked, too. I didn’t expect greatness from this team. I expected a push for .500, perhaps – and I certainly didn’t expect anything like what we saw Thursday. There’s very little to say. Thursday was total defeat. It shouldn’t be this way.

Paul Paul from Duval:

Week 8. Season over. Goodnight.

John: That’s how it feels. It shouldn’t feel that way because this season shouldn’t be 2-5 with one-sided, national-television losses. But that’s how it does feel. Bad. Really bad.

Terry from Chester, VA:

Pathetic and embarrassing.

John: For long, long stretches Thursday – yeah, pretty much.

Devin from Charleston, SC:

Are the wheels completely off yet?

John: If they weren’t off in the first half I don’t want to be around when they do come off.

Moshe from Mexico City:

The players have spoken: it’s obvious they want a new head coach. We (fans) deserve better, much better.

John: That’s an understandable sentiment. This was a team that needed to bring its best effort Thursday. That did not appear to be such an effort.

Shane from Washington, DC:

Just no offense…

John: No, there was no offense Thursday – at least not when it mattered. But on Thursday there honestly wasn’t enough of anything. There’s little question the offensive stagnation hurt, and ineffectiveness on that side of the ball drags everything down. But the Jaguars’ defense also allowed a 36-yard second-quarter touchdown pass to wide receiver Kendall Wright that was far too easy and the Titans had 354 yards offense at halftime. This was bad – inexcusably, franchise-shakingly bad – all around.

Brian from Does it Matter?:

You can see it in his face. No confidence. Gun shy with throws. Where is Blake’s head at John? And don’t say above his shoulders.

John: This is not the time for cute answers, though I’m sure I could think of a few. There seems little question that Bortles is struggling with confidence right now – and with reason. He’s not playing well. The Jaguars’ offense showed few if any signs of life early Thursday, and you never had a real feeling – particularly in the first half – that that was going to change. I don’t know where Bortles’ head is at. I only know this Jaguars offense doesn’t seem to have answers and it’s tearing apart the season.

Adam from Lynbrook, NY:

I have a feeling I’ll be going to bed early tonight …

John: This was the much-anticipated, over-analyzed, oft-ballyhooed first email of the game. No word on when Adam drifted into the land of nod.

Marco from Lima, Peru:

O, this project has failed. We have been out-coached by two former head coaches in a row. Offense is non-existent. Defense is undisciplined. Time for a change.

John: Thursday’s performance was the sort that often prompts change. I don’t know if it will prompt change in this case. We’ll see.

Chris from Mandarin, FL:

This year’s team is one of the worst versions I’ve seen. 14-41.

John: That’s certainly true of the offense, with the frustrating thing for the team obviously being that the defense in many stretches has played OK. They didn’t play remotely OK during the second quarter Thursday. But whatever … we won’t nit-pick on this one. Yeah, it’s bad.

Ross from Fleming Island, FL:
I feel for you. Your job is like trying to arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic. It is shocking how utterly lost this team is.

John: Shocking was absolutely the right word – for parts of this Jaguars season, but certainly for what transpired Thursday night. I expected the Jaguars to play disciplined and turn in an inspired performance Thursday. I don’t know that I realistically expected them to win because I thought without defensive tackle Roy Miller III this was going to be a tough matchup for the defense. I also doubted whether the offense could suddenly find itself in four days. But I didn’t expect 27-0 at halftime. I didn’t expect a 354-60 total-yardage edge for Tennessee at halftime. The degree to which the Jaguars were dominated was shocking. Absolutely.