O-Zone: Harder than it looks

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Bob from St. Augustine, FL:
Wait a minute, Oh Willy Namath … are you actually guaranteeing a victory or is this simply a warranty?

John: I guaranteed that the Jaguars will not lose to the Titans Sunday. And I stand by that. No way, no how.

John from Browns Mills, NJ:
What happened? Blake looked great last year. I really thought we would get .500 ball this year.

John: What happened is sort of complicated, but not incredibly so. What happened was Blake Bortles was good enough last season to look really good at times – but not good enough for the Jaguars to win very often. What also happened was he didn’t make some necessary strides in decision-making and accuracy in the offseason. What happened along with that is defenses this season schemed to take away his best receiver’s best play – i.e., Allen Robinson’s deep, 50-50 ball. What happened is that a combination of those things and a bit of digression has meant that Bortles really has struggled this season, particularly with games in the balance. And yeah, you weren’t alone: a lot of people thought the Jaguars would improve, but when you have a minus-17 turnover ratio and don’t play well in the fourth quarter it’s difficult to win in the NFL.

Logan from Wichita, KS:
So for Christmas all of us Jags fans just get another year of the middle finger. All our old coaches are succeeding. A lot of our former players are Pro-Bowl bound. And we have our ninth straight losing season and sixth straight top ten pick. Why do we never get anything nice? I’m sick of this constant hopelessness.

John: Merry Christmas, Logan.

Jordan from Jacksonville:
What is the culture like inside the building during the Doug Marrone era?

John: The culture during the Doug Marrone era is the culture of a team with an interim coach. That means it’s a culture of players trying to adjust quickly while playing the final two games of a season long since lost. Marrone is a very capable coach and I think he has handled a difficult situation as well as can be expected. But to expect a major culture change in three days is expecting a lot.

Dan from Jacksonville:
Am I the only one who believes Gus should not have been fired? I honestly believe the Jags let a very talented (albeit imperfect) coach go – and in doing so, decreased their chances of long-term success. Gus turned the Jags into a competitive team that could potentially beat any team in the NFL. As a fan who has followed the Jags closely since 1999, I truly believe Gus was building something special here and was on the verge of breaking through a barrier that would make the Jags a playoff contender. The barrier perhaps was a strong, consistent quarterback. To me, the Jags no longer seem like the Jags without Gus. Something special died last Sunday. Am I alone in these sentiments! John or are others feeling the same way?

John: You’re not alone, though you’re obviously in the minority. I said often I didn’t believe Gus Bradley was the predominant reason the Jaguars were 14-48 during his tenure. I also thought a lot of the 2-12 record this season was out of his control. At the same time, it’s close to impossible to maintain even the most positive of cultures forever in professional sports when you’re not winning. I’m all for continuity, but as I also said many times in recent weeks: continuity was going to be a tough, tough sell after four years with so few victories.

Matt from DC:
You indicate that “Bortles has some attributes that still give him a chance to be a franchise quarterback.” Other than size, what are the attributes that you believe he has that are indicative of franchise quarterback potential?

John: Size. Leadership ability. The proven production from 2015. The moments – and there have been moments – when he makes special plays and special throws that not every quarterback can make. These things I’ve listed aren’t enough, and he has to add a lot, but those are the attributes that at least give him a chance.

Carol from Jacksonville:
I watched Blake’s press conference Wednesday and I am extremely sad that he continually said “we” should have done more, etc. about Gus getting fired. If you are the quarterback you should just say you should have done more … the “we” part really shook me – this man has not been taught to take the blame for what he has caused – two offensive coordinator firings and one head coach.

John: I was at the press conference, Carol – and I heard Bortles say “I.” I also have listened to most of Bortles’ public press statements during his NFL career. I can tell you that of all of Bortles’ shortcomings as an NFL quarterback, an unwillingness to take the blame for his play is not among them.

Pamela from Atlantic Beach, FL:
John, I know we’re looking ahead, but Tom Savage was yet another example of a backup ready to play; so I’m hoping we can see someone other than Bortles under center this week. If he truly gives us the best chance to win then there can be no debate as to whether we have the worst quarterback room in the league, and if Billy O can pull his $70 Million dollar man we can certainly sit Blake.

John: I have received many, many emails along these lines this week. I get it. I understand the sentiment. I wouldn’t be against seeing Brandon Allen play. At this point, there’s probably not much harm – and at this point, I don’t even know that it would shake up the dynamic of Bortles potentially being the franchise guy moving forward. What I can tell you is I would be very surprised if Bortles doesn’t start and play all of the games the next two weeks.

Ken from Ontario, CA:
For Bortles to be our “Franchise Quarterback” we need to address the offensive line this coming offseason. Plain and simple. Give him another second every play to be protected, a line that can be better at the running game and a line that’s healthy. Plain and simple. Oh… and a head coach with a “run-first-to-get-a-second-and-short” mentality. Blake’s got potential, just need to surround him with some big healthy offensive linemen.

John: OK.

Morgan from Jacksonville:
I know it is very unlikely, but what would you think about bringing Gus back to be the defensive coordinator under a new head coach? The defense is on the rise for the most part and we brought him here after his defensive success. Is it just too much going on after his release for him to have a chance at coming back in a lesser role?

John: Gus Bradley won’t be the Jaguars’ defensive coordinator next season.

Dan from Orange Park, FL:
Zone, I’m counting seven Raiders Pro Bowl selections that all could have just as easily been Jags either via draft or free agency over the past four years – as compared to our zero. So, if Reggie McKenzie is the standard by which all other general managers shall be measured since 2013, what grade would you give Caldwell?

John: Not as good as McKenzie’s yet, obviously.

Ryan from Dearborn, MI:
John, I just read the best quote of the week regarding the firing of Gus Bradley, and it comes from Malik Jackson. This is why some of us wanted Gus fired earlier in the season. Jackson: “It is what it is. The train doesn’t stop for anybody. Gus got fired. We’ve got to keep rolling and go out here and win some games, or Khan’s going to fire one of us, too.” That’s what this team needs. A real fire lit under them and a belief that their jobs really are on the line if they don’t turn it around.

John: Jackson’s quote pretty much sums it up. As for whether a substantial “fire” would have been lit with a coaching change – it usually doesn’t work that way. A coaching change usually results in a one- or two-game impact – and then the team settles back to its normal level. Alas, we’ll never know.

Steve from Crystal River:
It may be obvious to some but I am really struggling with this. There are hundreds of college football programs in this country. That means there are hundreds of quarterbacks in this country playing college. I realize that the level of competition is different. However, why is it so hard to find 32 competent quarterbacks in the NFL with so many that play the position? I get it … not everyone can be Tom Brady. But shouldn’t it be easy to find the Andy Dalton-like or Dak Prescott-like kids out of all the colleges? It just seems like it should be easier than what it has been for teams than it is. What is the problem?

John: One problem is that college and professional football are different enough to practically be different sports. The difference in the speed of the game makes it so. Why is it hard to find a quarterback who can play at a high level in the NFL? The simplest answer is it’s a hard position. Like, really hard.

O-Zone: Get over it

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Logan from Wichita, KS:
This Sunday is either going to be really good or really, really, really bad. What team shows up? The one fighting to prove it belongs next year or the one broken by a bad record and losing its coach? I am begging for it to be the first one because I DO NOT want to be blown out like a bunch of rejects by the Titans again.

John: I can guarantee you the Titans will not blow out the Jaguars Sunday. I will go a step further and guarantee they will not beat the Jaguars Sunday.

Daniel from Duval:
I really think Abry Jones can keep the starting job next season the way he has been playing lately. He is a great run stuffer.

John: I think you’re right on both points, and I also think Jones is a pretty good pass rusher for his position. The thought was the Jaguars would really miss nose tackle Roy Miller when he was injured earlier this season against Oakland. Jones has played well enough in his place that Miller hasn’t been missed nearly as much as many thought.

Clif from Washington, DC:
I think it’s hilarious people want to blame Blake for Gus being fired. The Texans have a worse quarterback situation than the Jags and yet they somehow managed to win eight games this year without Watt. Gus is a bad head coach. It’s not a debate.

John: Yes, because it’s always coaching in the NFL.

Brian from Gainesville, FL:
Big O, please help us understand the decision to play Myles Jack only in non-running situations. He can’t defend the run? Why? Because of his high-level athleticism? Is it the fact that he understands the run game intimately? His otherworldly speed? I mean, c’mon. It’s not a knock on Skuta, but let’s remember that but for a concern about Jack’s long-term health, he was in the conversation for being picked over Jalen Ramsey and Ramsey is THE future of the Jaguars defense.

John: I understand the confusion over this issue. Many fans want Jack to play more and I get it. I think Jack should be playing more, too – because I’d like to see what he can do in a full-time situation. Jaguars coaches believe Skuta is the better option in heavy run packages. Considering that the defense has played at a pretty high level for the most part against the run, who knows? Maybe the coaches are right in this case.

Charlie from Jacksonville:
John, can you put in a good word for Sean Payton? I think he’d be ‘purrfect’ for the job. Maybe he could bring Drew Brees along, too. Wouldn’t that be something? Mention his name to Shad for me, would you?

John: Will do.

Cary from Montreal, Quebec:
I was wondering why the NFL doesn’t have full-time refs? I feel like I’ve seen more suspect calls and non-calls this season than I can remember. And there is definitely more criticism by player – or at least it seems that way. The NFL makes so much money … why are the refs part time? Heck, the CFL refs are better than the NFL; they are more consistent.

John: The NFL reportedly does plan to hire 17 full-time officials next season, and it essentially would add a referee to each crew. I’m fine with adding an official to each crew, and I guess there’s some benefit to a limited number of full-time officials. The new additions reportedly will focus on training and consultation year-round, and I suppose that makes some sense. Still, I honestly don’t see much reason to go crazy in this area. I’ve never been a big proponent of full-time officials because I can’t for the life of me figure how it will help improve officiating all that much – or for that matter what they will do to fill a 40-hour-a-week, 52-week-a-year job.

Ray from Jacksonville:
John: If everything was so amicable, why was the Bradley news conference conducted away from the facility?

John: He was no longer the head coach of the Jaguars.

Derrick from Jacksonville:
Let me start by stating the obvious: Gus is a good man. I understand that coaching is not the only reason for the Jags’ failure this year. But as the head coach, the buck stops there. Gus was the victim of his own decision-making when it came to Blake Bortles. He should have made a change and sat Blake Bortles for a game or two. Continuing to do the same thing expecting different results is by definition insanity. You keep stating that the organization believes in Bortles. The more important question that needs to be answered is does the other players believe in Bortles? Do you really think they still believe?

John: I’ve seen insanity defined as “extreme folly or unreasonableness,” but amazingly enough I’ve never seen it defined “continuing to do the same thing expecting different results” – although I’ve seen it attributed to Albert Einstein. Whatever. As for players’ belief in Bortles … I think human nature would make it reasonable for teammates to have at least some doubt. The team is 2-12 and he has struggled at times this season. But I think this offense has to have a lot of doubts all around – and that goes far beyond Bortles. The struggles have been extreme and involve more than one player.

James from Socorro, NM:
Referencing a recent email, one could say based on last year: “Bottom line for 2016. Offense is well on its way to being very good. Defense has a loooooooonnnngggg way to go.” Many were expecting the offense to be good this year and it clearly was not. Who is to say that the defense will be good next year?

John: There obviously is no guarantee that the defense will be good next year. I would say the same thing about the Jaguars’ defense this season as I said about the Jaguars’ offense last season – that while it has made strides from the previous season, there are still strides to be made. The offense last season improved from the season before, but it clearly needed to improve as a running offense and quarterback Blake Bortles clearly still needed to develop in some key areas this season. Neither happened. The defense this season improved from last season, but it clearly needs to make more impact plays and needs to create more pass rush next season. If that happens, then there are pieces in place around which a solid defense can be built. If not …

Travis from a land far, far away.:
O’Bro, with a weak quarterback class in the upcoming draft, and the intense scrutiny of the fans to can Bortles (which I disagree with), how do you think the team will approach this offseason to solidify the quarterback position?

John: I don’t think anyone will have the faintest idea what the Jaguars will do at quarterback next season until we know more about the next head coach.

Jeff from Yulee, FL:
Correct me if I’m wrong, Zone, but under the Gus Bradley regime – and still under the David Caldwell regime – the Jags seem to focus all in on one side of the football field each offseason. In 2014, offense was terrible, defense was better though not great, so Gus/Dave went mostly offense. In 2015, offense was much better, defense was much worse, Dave/Gus focus on defense in 2016. This year, defense is much improved, and offense is a disaster. It almost seems as if Gus/Dave spent all their time and energy on improving one side of the ball while completely ignoring or doing very little to improve the other side of the ball since in their mind it didn’t need “fixing.” Just an observation, and perhaps one of the reasons Gus didn’t work out. I think the inconsistencies on the offense this year and the defense last year, fall mostly on Gus/Dave’s shoulders. What say you O-man?

John: Well, of course the inconsistencies on a particular side of the ball in recent seasons fall on Dave Caldwell and Gus Bradley; they have been the general manager and head coach, so on their shoulders do such things fall. As far as recent offseasons emphasizing one side of the ball or the other – yes, things played out that way. The Jaguars focused heavily on offense in the 2014 NFL Draft and the 2015 offseason, and until this season it seemed that focus had paid off. This season has cast serious doubt on that notion. The 2016 NFL Draft and offseason seem to have improved the defense dramatically, and that improvement seems to be real. I expect focus on both side of the ball this offseason, though it certainly seems reasonable to think offense could have a touch more emphasis.

Bill from Danville:
Jack is not a typical strong-side linebacker. The other two linebackers are playing his typical positions and are doing better than the rookie could. END OF STORY, GET OVER IT!!!

John: Oh yeah – that, too.

O-Zone: Color coordination

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Kevin from Jacksonville:

While I agree it’s the players’ jobs to execute the plays, I do think coaching has much more of an influence than is being given credit. The coaches decide which players are on the field, so – for example – when you have an ‘otherworldly’ talent in Myles Jack on the bench because Dan Skuta is five pounds heavier … that’s a coaching decision. When we get a first-half lead and try to squat on it, that is a coaching decision. I think it’s disheartening for the players to hear all week that our goal is to be aggressive and compete, which is great, but then on Sunday we changed our tune and were calling very conservative games.

John: Coaching indeed has an influence, and there’s no question it’s the coaches’ decision to play Dan Skuta at Otto linebacker in run situations. I’m not a huge fan of that because it’s probably time to see the rookie full-time. Still, considering the Jaguars’ defense has played at a pretty high level it’s hard to argue vehemently against the decision. The approach being taken offensively is trickier. I absolutely think that at some point you have to let Blake Bortles and this offense try to make plays downfield. He can’t be a big-time NFL quarterback with such an obvious emphasis on the screen pass and back-shoulder throws. At the same time, you’re talking about a quarterback who has struggled with interceptions fairly significantly. It’s not hard to see why coaches would scheme to avoid that.

Tom from Orlando, FL:

3-13?

John: Sure, why not?

Raymond from Jacksonville:

John: “It’s not easy to find a franchise quarterback, and you don’t want to give up on one until you’re sure he’s not one.” Please stop. The only time the words “franchise” and “Bortles” should be in the same sentence is if he buys a McDonald’s franchise with the money the Jags have needlessly paid him.

John: I didn’t write that I believe Bortles is destined to be a franchise quarterback. The results of his first three seasons don’t suggest that. But there is a limited pool of potential franchise quarterbacks, and the vast majority of those players are the property of other teams. Bortles has some attributes that still give him a chance to be a franchise quarterback – and he did some things in 2015 that also made it appear he could be that. The reason you continue to start him through this season is there is still a belief in the building that could happen. At some point very soon there will be conversations with head-coaching candidates on the matter – and the person who is selected will have input into Bortles’ role and future with the Jaguars. That’s when the Jaguars’ approach with Bortles could change. But I don’t see it changing in the next two weeks.

Chris from Houston, TX:

John, stop the love affair with Gus. When you lose as much as he did, then who really cares how nice you are or that he is a “good man?” For the last two days all you posted are the “We will miss you, good man Gus – even though you consistently lost game after game.” Time to move on from losing Gus as Shad should’ve done weeks ago. My question is, “What is the tone in the locker room now?” I think that since now the dead weight of Gus is finally off their backs, that the team will come out and play inspired football.

John: Thank you for the input, Chris. I’ll go ahead and keep answering questions in the O-Zone to the best of my ability, and I’ll keep appreciating and incorporating your input when appropriate. I’ll also laud someone for being a good man pretty much when I see fit – though I can check with you on that front if necessary. As far as the tone in the locker room, let’s just say the Jaguars’ players didn’t consider Bradley dead weight – and whatever their issues have been this season, inspiration or effort hasn’t been among them.

Otto from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:

John, I’m looking at the latest stats. Out of the Top 6 sacks leaders in the NFL, five are linebackers. With our players, wouldn’t a 3-4 defense make sense? Malik and Yannick at end and Roy/Sen’Derrick at nose tackle. OLBs Telvin, Dante. ILBs Poz and Myles. Didn’t Fowler play standing up a lot at Florida? Any thoughts?

John: This is an idea that’s getting floated a lot, and I have nothing philosophically against a 3-4 defensive scheme. The overriding problem with the idea for the Jaguars is it really doesn’t solve their issue of how to get linebackers Paul Posluszny, Myles Jack and Telvin Smith on the field at the same time. While Dante Fowler Jr. indeed would fit into a 3-4 scheme as an outside linebacker, Jack, Posluszny and Smith are more inside linebackers in that scheme.

Ben from Jacksonville:

How many games does Blake have to lose before David Caldwell and this staff loses faith in him? The guy has done more to lose games than to win. He should not be our quarterback next year. Hearing Caldwell’s presser it worries me that he’s going to hire a coach that agrees with him and wants to keep Bortles. Can you say Gabbert 2.0?

John: We’re not there yet.

Tom from Orlando, FL:

Mr. O, please correct me if my facts are wrong. The Jaguars are using Myles Jack at the strong-side linebacker position in base packages. When it looks like a power-running formation, or an obvious running situation, they bring in Dan Skuta. However, in obvious passing situations, they switch to the nickel package, and take the strong-side linebacker out for a third cornerback. Now, if this is the case – and you want your best players on the field – why don’t they move Jack to middle linebacker and take Poz out in the nickel package? His sideline-to-sideline speed and playmaking ability needs to be on the field when the opponent is airing it out.

John: Your facts are correct about how Jack and Skuta are being used, and I think that putting Jack on the field in nickel situations is something that will be done in the future. For now, the thought among the coaches is that Paul Posluszny is playing at such a high level that they don’t want to take him out of the nickel package.

Alan from Jacksonville:

It’s hard to believe we were one injury away from playing Ben Koyack at offensive tackle. I blame our lack of drafting at least one offensive lineman last year. It seems like we were scoring in the third round with Brandon Linder and A.J. Cann, so why did we stop there? Just to handle attrition it would seem smart to at least draft one or two offensive line every year … and not just in Rounds 6 or 7. It’s why we can’t run the ball. I can’t think of a great team that didn’t have an outstanding offensive line. To me this is, well, offensive.

John: The Jaguars were an injury away from playing Koyack at offensive tackle Sunday because they had in-game injuries that sidelined first Jeremiah Poutasi then Josh Wells. They opted to leave Luke Bowanko inactive Sunday, which meant they had seven offensive linemen active. Because Wells was a swing tackle, they entered the game with a backup at tackle (Wells) and a backup at center/guard (Tyler Shatley). This is not an uncommon approach in the NFL – and carrying seven offensive linemen in a game isn’t uncommon either. It has nothing to do with how many offensive linemen the Jaguars have drafted. As for drafting an offensive lineman or two every year, I’m all for it but you can only draft so many players each year and there’s attrition at a lot of positions. There’s no question the offensive line must improve, though. I expect it to be a major area of offseason focus – at left guard, right tackle and perhaps more. Still, that issue doesn’t have anything to do with Koyack nearly playing tackle Sunday; that was a result of a run of injuries.

O-Zone: Bottom line

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Evan from Tallahassee, FL:

John, I sent a scathing email Sunday right after the game before Gus Bradley was fired criticizing the losing culture around this team. While I don’t take back what I said – there’s definitely a losing culture around this team – I want to give credit where credit is absolutely due. Gus is a man’s man for flying back on the team plane, then having a media availability session the next day where he heaped praise on the organization that just fired him. I can think of about zero other NFL head coaches – or people in general – who have the class to address this kind of situation in such a graceful way. Gus Bradley … you might doubt his coaching ability, but there’s no doubting he’s one hell of a man.

John: This is true. Bradley handled the aftermath of his dismissal Sunday as he handled his entire Jaguars tenure – with dignity and class. He had no problem flying on the charter because he knew he had approached his job the right way, and he knew there was no shame in that. Was it the most enjoyable experience of his life? Surely not. But it was one he could handle. I wasn’t surprised Bradley chose to speak with the media Monday, although he was under no obligation to do so. He chose to do so because he always believed his mission with the Jaguars was about more than just winning. He believed it was about conducting himself in a certain way, shaping players on and off the field and helping to build the Jaguars into a team of which the city and area would be proud. He accomplished the first two. Some would say he didn’t accomplish the latter because the team didn’t win. That’s fine. People can remember and judge Bradley how they choose – and there’s little doubt that the time had come where a move had to be made. But that doesn’t change what he gave to this team and this community. He did handle himself with grace and class, and I think a lot of people will remember him that way.

Rob from Rochester, NY:

Wow, John. This is the worst offense in the league. Letting the clock run out with a minute left in the first half and three timeouts? If you can’t trust your quarterback to throw the ball 8-10 yards and get a couple first downs he belongs on the bench.

John: This appears to be developing into more and more of an issue in the last couple of weeks. It seemed against Minnesota last week that the Jaguars were reluctant to have quarterback Blake Bortles throw downfield and to take many chance throws. It felt that way again on Sunday against Houston, and Bortles talked extensively after the game about the need to stay aggressive offensively. He likened the offense in the second half to a basketball team passing the ball around and until the shot clock runs down, then heaving a three-pointer. It’s pretty clear from that statement that Bortles wants to go downfield – and yes, he must be able to do that if he’s going to be an effective NFL quarterback. Can he do that effectively? Can the Jaguars figure out a way for him to do effectively? I’d like to see them attempt it in the last two games.

Jerry from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:

Nice of Gus to take the time to thank everyone. Many coaches would be bitter and make excuses. He is a class act and his personality will be missed. Go Jags.

John: Yep.

Mac from Neptune Beach, FL:

What draft picks would we likely have to give up to trade for Garappolo?

John: My guess is it would probably take a first-round selection to acquire Jimmy Garappolo – though the Jaguars will be selecting early enough in the draft that perhaps a second-round selection would be enough. There also is the school of thought that the past performances of many high-profile quarterbacks with little starting experience following trades – Brock Osweiler, for instance – could make general managers wary of such a move. There also is the possibility that all of this is moot, and that the Patriots might not want to Garappolo. While it appears Tom Brady could play forever, that’s unlikely to actually happen – and that could make the Patriots want to retain Garappolo. We’ll see.

Mario from Orlando, FL:

Dear Zone, I am sad Coach Bradley was fired. I feel that he was the victim of horrendous quarterback play. Coach Bradley can definitely have success with a good quarterback. Blake Bortles, on the other hand, doesn’t seem like he’ll have success under any coach.

John: Most coaches can have success with good quarterback play – and in that sense, there’s no question Bortles’ play this season hurt a lot of things around the Jaguars. Can Bortles find success under another coach? I think there’s a very good chance we’re going to find out.

Tommy from Jax:

I’m back. Not that you remember. I think I said I wasn’t coming back until both Gus and Blake were gone, but maybe it was only one. Anyway, Blake should feel pretty darn bad. I would say he’s about 89 percent of the reason Gus is gone. You can’t win football games when you don’t have at least average quarterback play. The only reason I don’t feel bad about Gus is because he was so blind to the overlying issue. I liked Gus … wish we could have had that team we all envisioned. I can’t wait till I see an O-Zone titled “Bortles Out.” He has ruined enough jobs. It’s time to go.

John: With Bradley now gone, there are two primary issues facing the team: Who will be the next head coach? And what will that mean for Bortles? It’s hard to say which is more important, though I would lean toward quarterback being the more pressing issue. I have written often that I believe better quarterback play would have meant a better record this season. Would better coaching have meant the same thing? Perhaps, but it’s my experience that quarterback in the NFL is a more important factor than coaching. That’s not me saying “Bortles must go.” It’s not easy to find a franchise quarterback, and you don’t want to give up on one until you’re sure he’s not one. Whatever your opinion on that topic, the Jaguars still believe Bortles can be that guy. He obviously must improve greatly and whoever is coaching this team next year obviously needs to believe in Bortles on some level if the franchise is going to move forward with Bortles and the new head coach. Stay tuned.

Aaron from White Hall, AR:

It really sucks that Gus had to be let go, but I understand why. I just hope they don’t go the Tom Coughlin route because there is a reason he was fired before. It’s like getting divorced then getting married again to that same person. It makes no sense.

John: Tom Coughlin absolutely makes sense as the Jaguars’ head coach. That doesn’t mean he would match the success he had here from 1996-1999. Past success is no guarantee of future success in the NFL, and – as is the case with any head coach – a lot would have to go right for Coughlin to succeed. But what you want out of a head coach is someone capable of setting the tone for an organization and capable of creating an environment in which players can succeed. Coughlin can do those things. I’d like to see a coach with head-coaching experience, because I think that would be a positive for what is still a young team. Because of those things … yeah, I’d like to see Coughlin as the head coach. That doesn’t mean he’s the only candidate or the best candidate, but I think he’s a darned good candidate.

Zac from Duval:

O-Man, this is the question you don’t want to answer and we all know how you’ll spin – but gonna ask it anyways… Is Blake Bortles really that much better than Tim Tebow?

John: I always smile when people assume there are questions I “don’t want to answer.” I think Bortles is better than Tebow – largely based on Bortles’ play at times in the 2015 season. Honestly, because of Tebow’s appearance in the playoffs, Bortles’ career to date hasn’t been all that much better than Tebow’s. But I do think overall he still has a lot more upside than Tebow. Now, if you look at this season … well, there have been some games for Bortles that have been a real struggle. The important question is whether Bortles’ career will be significantly better than that of Tebow. Right now, it’s close. If he’s going to be “that much better” than Tebow, he has a lot of improving to do in a hurry.

Brian from Jacksonville:

Myles Jack against Houston – eight out of 84 snaps. What are we, the fans, missing? Why isn’t he on the field more? I want the truth. I can handle the truth.

John: There’s not any real mystery here. The coaches are playing Dan Skuta when they think the opponent is going to be in heavy or run-oriented looks. They expected the Texans to be heavy run on Sunday, so Skuta played 31 snaps and Jack played eight. Whether or not you agree with that approach, that’s why it’s happening.

Brian from Section 238:

Bottom line for 2017. Defense is well on its way to being very good. Offense has a loooooooonnnngggg way to go.

John: That pretty much sums it up.

O-Zone: One more fer

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Josh from Rochester, MN:

Sucks. I understand the move, but I don’t like it. Feels like starting over again.

John: This was one of seemingly countless emails Sunday evening and Monday morning on the obvious topic of the firing of Jaguars Head Coach Gus Bradley – and as might be expected, the emails ran a range of reaction and emotions. Relief. Disappointment. Hope. There were also the expected I-told-you-soers who have wanted Bradley fired for a long time and were ecstatic it “finally” happened. All of that’s fine. It’s part of being a fan, and firing an NFL head coach understandably brings a slew of reaction. The bottom line: however you feel about Bradley as a head coach, it was going to be difficult if not impossible to bring him back after this season. It had simply reached an end. I have written often and will continue to write that Bradley was overly criticized and that to blame him entirely for the 14-48 record over four seasons is to ignore that for the first two and perhaps three seasons it would have been difficult for any coach to have had a better record than he did. But when Bradley received a contract extension late last season, it became obvious the Jaguars were going to need to at least get pretty close to a winning record for Bradley to continue as head coach. That didn’t happen. While Bradley made mistakes and while the Jaguars showed a disturbing lack of discipline at times this season, I don’t believe that Bradley was remotely all that ailed the Jaguars this season. Had quarterback Blake Bortles played marginally better, the Jaguars could have won four or five more games – and if that had happened, the conversation around Bradley would have been much different. But whatever the reason, it was clear it was time for a change. You can only lose so long in the NFL as a head coach before a change is going to be made and it was clearly going to happen in the coming weeks. As it was, it happened Sunday. Does that mean starting over? In one sense, yes, because the direction will be new. But there is talent on this roster and this doesn’t have to be a massive “rebuild” on the scale of 2013. Will a change provide a spark? Will a new direction be the answer? That’s the hope. Jaguars General Manager David Caldwell will speak to the media at 2 p.m. Monday. We’ll start finding out more about that direction then.

Dave from Duval:

We’re not happy Gus was fired. We thought that the future of the franchise is better off without Gus as the head coach – and apparently the owner agreed. Stay tuned.

John: Everyone involved in the decision hopes that the future of the franchise indeed is brighter than the recent past – Bradley absolutely included. I have no doubt that will be the case, and the time indeed had come where a move was inevitable. Will change bring results? That’s the hope. Was Bradley chiefly responsible for what was going wrong with the organization? I have my doubts, but perhaps the shakeup and redirection that a coaching change brings will have the desired results. As you say, stay tuned.

Don from Duval:

I know you’re hurting now, Zoney. But time heals wounds unless you’re a Jags fan. Then time brings new deeper wounds.

John: This day isn’t remotely about me. Am I sorry that a good man lost his job and didn’t find success despite complete and total heartfelt commitment to that cause? Of course. To feel otherwise would lack a certain amount of decency and compassion, I think. But don’t feel for me. Feel for Bradley, and the families of coaches whose lives will be affected by this. That’s real-life stuff, and not something to celebrate.

Andrew from Mattoon, IL:

Tip of the hat to Coach Gus. Loved his passion and positive attitude. I wish him well wherever he lands.

John: Indeed.

Jeff from Jacksonville:

I keep hearing that one of the reasons Gus didn’t have success is because he didn’t bring enough of his “own players” from Seattle to help implement the type of locker-room culture he wanted. How important do you actually think this is to coaching?

John: I actually haven’t heard that theory a whole lot and I don’t know how much different the last four seasons would have been had Bradley brought players from Seattle. Unless, of course, those players were named Earl Thomas, Richard Sherman, Russell Wilson, Marshawn Lynch, Kam …

Dave from Jacksonville:

Maybe if we get an even nicer head coach this time it will work out better.

John: Perhaps. Niceness doesn’t really have anything to do with anything either way, but if you want a mean guy … who knows … maybe Shad Khan and David Caldwell will shoot that to the top of the list.

Merry Christmas from Earth:

The next head coach should not be stuck with No. 5 because he is a coach killer. I hope they give him the chance to start with who he wants at quarterback. But can we admit this rebuild was a failure and no team should ever rebuild like this again?

John: I think there’s still a lot to be said for the way the Jaguars tried to rebuild the culture of the organization. And there’s little question that you must try to rebuild primarily through the draft. I would say in retrospect that the main issue that hurt the Jaguars the last couple of seasons was an overall lack of experienced core players at key spots in the roster. This remains a young team at some critical spots without core players who have been with the Jaguars since the beginning of their careers. It’s difficult to have such players when you draft poorly and that was part of the dilemma General Manager David Caldwell faced when he took over the roster. It takes time to draft and develop your own core guys into six- and-seven-year veterans. That’s what this team really, really lacks—that, of course, and reliable play at quarterback.

Brian from Section 238:

Bench Bortles. You can’t argue otherwise.

John: I doubt that happens this season.

Scotty from Points North:

Call it what you will but hiring a new coach is a rebuild. Oh the pain of being a Jaguar fan …

John: OK.

Matt from Union City, TN:

Ramsey is other worldly. That is all. #DTWD

John: It would have been easy before the announcement of Bradley’s dismissal to answer every question in O-Zone Late Night about Jalen Ramsey – his game Sunday was that memorable and his performance was that spectacular. He made at least six momentum-turning, highlight plays – and his best play may not even have been the 25-yard interception return that set up a first-half field goal. He also broke up a fade pass to wide receiver DeAndre Hopkins in the second quarter to cap a key goal-line stand, and he leveled Hopkins to break up a potential first-down converting pass. This was a battle all day between two big-time players and both players got their share of victories in one-on-one battles. But Ramsey is destined to be a big-time, All-Pro cornerback in the NFL – and Sunday was a vivid example of why.

John from St. Augustine, FL:

John, all you have to go on when you hire a coach with no experience is what he did as a coordinator and his ability to knock the interview out of the park. If a guy has been a head coach you have a better idea of what he will do. We went new guy last time, KC went fired guy … fired guy has been pretty good.

John: You’re right. Andy Reid has been successful in Kansas City. And John Fox has struggled mightily with the Chicago Bears after coaching in Super Bowls in Carolina and Denver. If you hired the right coach and put him in the right situation, it usually will yield results whether or not the guy has experience. If you hire the wrong coach and put him in the wrong situation, it won’t. I have nothing against hiring an experienced head coach with a record of NFL success. In fact, I’d prefer it. But let’s not pretend it’s a fail-safe formula. There’s no such thing as a fail-safe formula for hiring a head coach. If one existed, every team would use it and every team would win Super Bowls.

Chris from Mandarin:

Where do we go from here? As you say, it’s not always about coaching in the NFL … even though, it’s always about coaching in the NFL.

John: Gus Bradley was just fired Sunday night, so the answer obviously is that the Jaguars don’t yet know exactly where they will go from here. Caldwell will speak to the media Monday afternoon, and I don’t imagine the criteria for the search for the next coach will be provided any particular detail. My personal belief is the specifics – defensive/offensive, players coach/disciplinarian, experienced/inexperienced – don’t matter all that much. I don’t even really care all that much if a guy has head coaching experience, though my guess is that will be a priority in this search. Find a head coach you believe in, and go from there. A wise man once said that there’s no fail-safe formula because if there was everyone would use it. I wish I could remember who that guy was. I really thought he was cool.

Steve from Jacksonville:

Here’s one last one for Gus.

John: Absolutely. One fer Gus.

O-Zone: The popular choice

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

GPP from Savannah, GA:

Why is David Caldwell getting a pass when it was his decision to draft Bortles? Caldwell’s other first-round picks have not been stellar nor have his free-agent signings.

John: I guess I’m never sure what “getting a pass” means when it comes to coaches or general managers. Jaguars General Manager David Caldwell has come under plenty of criticism from fans and media this season, and when Owner Shad Khan evaluates what’s going on with the Jaguars I’m quite certain he asks Caldwell questions and evaluates his performance. Does getting a pass mean not getting fired? If so, then yes … Caldwell might “get a pass.” I hope that’s the case, because despite not accomplishing the impossible task hitting on every free agent and draft selection over a four-year period he has put a structure in place and is building a foundation that can lead to this team to competitiveness and beyond. I don’t know if Khan agrees with that. We’ll see. Look, I get that people are talking a lot right now about who will “get a pass” and who won’t. The argument right now against Caldwell seems to be he “missed” on quarterback Blake Bortles. I don’t know that that’s written in stone yet, and I don’t know that missing on a quarterback must be grounds for firing – public perception notwithstanding. Overall I think Caldwell returning is the right move – because while the timetable may feel too long, the organization’s course in terms of young talent and potential moving forward remains strong. I don’t yet know what will happen on this front. I don’t know that many outside Khan do. Stay tuned.

Jordan from Little Valley:

Would you be upset with the fans if they throw a parade for Bradley’s 50th loss?

John: Fans can do what they want. I try not to let their actions dictate my emotions. I’ve learned it’s better that way.

Chuck from Jacksonville:

I know I am in the minority in the city, but I would like to give Dave and Gus one more year before we pull the plug. Their drafting seems to have us on the right track. Not all of the free-agent signings have been great, but the contracts were structured correctly and we know free agency is a crap shoot at best. If Blake had not regressed to a high-school quarterback, I believe the team would have more wins and be more competitive. I hate to think we are going to start over with the front office and coaches and change philosophy again when maybe one more year would put us where we need to be. Your thoughts?

John: You indeed are in the minority. I don’t know what will happen after the season. I wish I did. As I have said often in recent weeks … while I favor continuity in the NFL on a philosophical level, considering the expectations entering this season, continuity in this instance would be an exceedingly difficult path.

Travis from Duval:

Great News!! Actually, I don’t have any regarding the Jags, can you help?

John: Not actually, no.

Herbert from MidState Office Supply Accountz Receevablez:

Would you consider Brandon Allen to be a waste of a roster spot this season considering he’s been inactive for every game this season and the fact that most teams passed on him in the draft due to his small hands?

John: Not particularly, no. We won’t know for several seasons if Brandon Allen was a waste of a roster spot. If he never is the Jaguars’ primary backup quarterback and/or if the Jaguars never acquire anything for him in a trade, then perhaps he was a waste. If not, not.

Dave from Duval:

When you have been as bad as this franchise has been projecting and speculating quarterbacks, it does make sense to hold on to Bortles and extend the pain even longer. Then, he can twist the knife and add on to his record.

John: OK.

Casper from Orlando, FL:

Sometimes you must look at the stupidity represented in your mailbox and just shake your head.

John: If I ever am tempted to do such a thing I look in the mirror and remember my readers have the ability to shake their heads, too.

Jacob from North Carolina:

Would you consider sitting most of the starters in the final games to avoid injury? Or would you consider not starting people if they make it on the injury list (only start people who are “fully” healthy)? Or not make any changes in regards to starting players? I know we want to win now, but it would be nice to be fully healthy starting next year (but what do I know). Thanks!

John: I would be cautious with injured players in the sense that I wouldn’t play a player if an injury had them more at risk for further injury than otherwise would be the case. Aside from that … nah.

Steve from Nashville, TN:

On Monday, January 2 I suspect there will be changes announced in Jacksonville and maybe a few other NFL cities around the country. Will you be working that day?

John: To the best of my recollection I have worked the day after the NFL regular-season finale for each of the last 21 years. I see no reason why this season should be any different.

Matt from Orange Park, FL:

I know you hate when I ask this O-Man, but I’d love to get your thoughts. You actually think it’s OK to have a segment called Jags of the Round Table at a square table? C’mon, throw me a bone here.

John: I have no idea what you’re talking about.

Corey from Orange Park, FL:

I don’t get the distaste for Khan’s decision to finish out the season with Bradley. What does firing him now, as opposed to at the end of the season, do? If anything, I would say it shows we have an owner who will let you see through what you’re trying to accomplish. I don’t think of it as a bad thing. It was a four-year plan, and we are at the end of the fourth year. It isn’t ideal, and I’m definitely against retaining Bradley. But I remember Mel Tucker. I remember how irrelevant we still were. I know people want something to change, but this season is almost over and a change now will do nothing, in my opinion. Thanks for what you do, John!

John: I don’t get worked up about midseason coaching changes one way or the other. That’s because they historically have no real lasting benefit, and at the same time, there’s no real benefit or loss to whatever decision gets made. The interim coach usually is largely forgotten by the time a new coach is hired in January, and the mood/culture at that point within the building is dominated by the new coach and the changes that have taken place. Change coaches midseason, don’t change coaches midseason … whatever … the decision pales in comparison to what’s coming in a few weeks/months.

Don from Duval:

I think the worst part about this time of year, besides everything, is that if and when we win one of these garbage games it just hurts draft position and so I have doubly nothing to look forward to.

John: OK.

Brian from Gainesville, FL:

Big O, the question and answer regarding A-Rob’s body language and frustration sent shudders of worry through me. The one thing the Jaguars can cling to right now, and it’s a significant thing indeed, is that there is a growing core of good/great – most importantly, young – players around which the future will grow. But is there a chance that many of these young stars will simply abandon ship at the first opportunity leaving us staring down a new rebuild?

John: The Jaguars’ good, young players are under contract through at least the 2017 season. There is no reason the Jaguars can’t re-sign the core players they want to keep before they hit the open market.

Scott from Aurora, IL:

I’m back. Actually, let’s face it: I never left. I think firing Gus Bradley is not the answer. When you step back and really think about it, while not all things have gone well everywhere else all the time, there is only one part of the team that woefully underperformed and that is the quarterback position. Do everything, anything, you can to find a quarterback that can play at a Top 15 level and this team is pretty good.

John: Welcome back, Scott.

Michael from Middleburg, FL:

It’s beyond me how arm-chair quarterbacks and media know-it-alls think they know more about who, how much and where players play than the coaches.

John: Sometimes those arm-chair quarterbacks are right. And a lot of times they’re wrong. Sometimes the media know-it-alls are right, too. A lot of times they’re wrong. That’s what makes it exciting and fun.

Mark from Jacksonville:

Who is (or are) the people responsible for a 14-47 record? Ownership? General manager? Coaches? Players? Fans? O-Man?

John: It’s not the fans, but O-Man is starting to gain a lot of popularity.

O-Zone: Sweet mysteries

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

James from Palm Coast, FL:

What do you see as the biggest difference in Blake Bortles this year compared to last year? The biggest difference to me is Blake’s arm strength and accuracy has diminished, though not on every snap. I also have seen where the receivers are not getting separation, plus he seems to be floating the ball on passes of 10 to 15 yards. Thank you for your response.

John: I don’t know that there’s any one huge difference between Bortles this year and last year. I think there unquestionably was a stretch this season when he was less accurate than last season – and he was really struggling in a lot of areas around midseason. But I honestly don’t know if there’s as mammoth a difference between Bortles this season and last season as many believe. He struggled at the start of games last season, and he also struggled with interceptions. The offense often was inefficient, and his decision-making often was a reason. As has been noted, some of his statistics last season came at the end of games with the Jaguars trailing. The Jaguars have been in closer games for the most part this season, so perhaps some so-called “mop-up” touchdowns and yards haven’t come as easily. I basically feel about Bortles as a quarterback similarly to how I did this time last year. He’s a guy with a lot of potential, and one who has shown he can produce in the NFL. He also remains a player who has to take a step forward in terms of decision-making, accuracy and game awareness. I think the accuracy stuff can improve in the offseason because he took steps in that area between Year 1 and 2. Can the decision-making progress? We’ll see.

Kris from Neenah, WI:

The NFL is a business, plain and simple – designed to earn revenue. If a fan truly believes this organization is not trying everything in its power to win, which in hand would generate more revenue … well, strictly speaking, they are insane.

John: I know.

Chris from Crestview, FL:

John, I don’t know how to say this, but is Bortles “Football Dumb?” There are times and places to make a bad throw: for example, on fourth down … if nothing else is open, wing it rather than take a sack. But on second and goal … throw that puppy away rather than force it. I don’t know what to call that, but I think that’s what I see: a quarterback that doesn’t take account when/where he is.

John: Decision-making and game sense have been issues for Bortles during each of his three seasons. They’re not issues all the time, but they’re issues often enough that they’re well … issues.

Jason from North Pole, AK:

A reader made a great point recently about our statistics compared to the Texans. This team is not far off and the roster is full of talent. At this point, we are going to be adding a Top 5 pick to a roster that already has the young core put together. Did we just project the turning of the corner a year early?

John: That’s not out of the question. With the Jaguars at 2-11 and in the midst of a terrifically disappointing season in which they in no way came close to expectations, I’m not going to spend a great deal of time banging the table about how close this team is to being competitive. At the same time, I expected this team to be about 7-9 to 9-7 this season and the Jaguars realistically are a few key plays from being at that level. So, is it possible that with slightly better play at quarterback — and with a year for these young players to grow – that the Jaguars could improve dramatically next season? Sure, it’s possible.

David from Orlando, FL:

O-Zone, shortly after Dave Caldwell drafted Blake Bortles, he said something like he graded Bortles to be the best quarterback prospect in this draft and the next. In other words, he projected Bortles to be better than Derek Carr, Jameis Winston and Marcus Mariota. Can you think of any single decision that had more impact on where this organization is today than that one?

John: Not right now, no. If it stays that way, then Caldwell missed big-time. Right now, it looks as if he did miss on Bortles. Sometimes, perceptions and career arcs change in the NFL. We’ll see if this one does.

Cliff from Washington, DC:

If Gus is not the overwhelming reason this team is 14-47 (which is so dumb to even write), then what is the overwhelming reason?

John: The overwhelming reason is there are a bunch of reasons – just as there are almost always a bunch of reasons when things go bad in the NFL. A huge reason for the overall record over the last four seasons is that the Jaguars were in a major rebuilding mode for the first few seasons, and it would have been hard for any head coach to have coached the Jaguars to a significantly better record than the Jaguars had in 2013, 2014 and perhaps even 2015. A primary reason that the Jaguars have struggled this season is that they didn’t get the needed/expected improvement from their offense; a lot of that is because Bortles didn’t make the necessary/needed improvement, but that’s not the only reason the offense didn’t improve. The defense also still lacks a slam-the-door pass rusher, and the combination of lack of pass rush and struggling quarterback play has contributed to a minus-17 turnover ratio that remains the critical stat in this disappointing season. The team also remains a little young at pass rusher and quarterback; that’s not to make an “excuse,” but it is reality that there aren’t reliable, core veterans in those areas. So, who’s at fault for this? Many will “blame” David Caldwell and still others will blame Bradley. Maybe it’s Bortles for not improving enough. More than likely it’s a combination of the above.

Nate from York, PA:

With having such a young and for the most part inexperienced team, is it wise to have an inexperienced head coach leading it? Gus Bradley may be a good coach and may have better success with a team of veteran players. But with a team that is majority rookie-to-third-year players, wouldn’t a veteran, experienced head coach be a better idea?

John: I’ve never been big on seeking a certain Type of Head Coach as in, “We Must Hire an Offensive Coach Because the Last Coach Was a Defensive Coach,” or, “We Must Hire a Disciplinarian Because the Last Coach Was a Players’ Coach,” or “We Must Hire an Experienced Coach Because the Last Coach Was a Younger Coach.” Hire the coach you think is the best one for the job. If he’s good, he’ll be good. If he’s not, it won’t matter if he’s a disciplinarian or a defensive guy or experienced or whatever.

Mike from Jacksonville:

I agree, John. Gus is not the biggest reason for the losses. Better quarterback play and the Jags would be at least .500 and no one would be blaming coaching.

John: Well, they still would be blaming it – it just wouldn’t be as dramatic.

John from Jacksonville:

Just like when Blake takes a huge hit in a game, he gets back up and plays the next play. He is tough and I believe this season will not define him. I think he will continue to fight his way through this and come back strong next year. He’s still a young man, with hopefully a long career in front of him. I think he’s learning how to manage himself with some very difficult lessons this season. I think that’s what his teammates and coaches see in him, and here’s hoping he comes back tougher and better than ever. He is a stand-up guy, and seems to be a guy who looks honestly at things and will not give up. I’m still wearing my No. 5 jersey.

John: #DTWD

Andrew from Honeytown:
Will the Jaguars find their honey this holiday season or will they be left at the altar? I disagree with you regarding Jags getting another win. I do agree with you now as I did two weeks ago that odds are the Jags should win one game out of five. However, I just don’t think it is in the MOJO cards with all the bad luck the Jags have experienced in the previous 13 games. Merry Krimma and hopefully a happier MOJO in the New Year.

John: I continue to think the Jaguars will win at least one more game this season. I believe this because I believe they’ll continue to be in games in the fourth quarter, and I figure the odds are with them that they’ll figure out a way to make a play in the fourth quarter to win one of those games. I well realize that I’m statistically running out of time for this to be true. So, which game will the Jaguars win? Ah, the sweet mysteries of this thing we call life.

O-Zone: Nine days away

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Don from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:
Regardless of how everyone feels about Gus Bradley in 100 years, when they look at the archives they will not see your point of view. They are going to see a bad coach. Not that he is, but what determines that perception is his record. Nothing personal to the person. No stories. Just the record. That’s the way it works in the NFL. As much as you like someone and want to see them have success, you cannot defend not winning. Gus Bradley is directly responsible for the Jaguars’ poor performance because he is in charge. Everyone wanted this to work, but it is not close – not even a sniff close. Go Jags!

John: You are absolutely correct – and Bradley’s tenure undoubtedly will be judged harshly based on the record and the performance. There is no other way to judge it, and there is nothing incorrect nor mean nor harsh about fans disliking Bradley as a coach – or about wanting Bradley fired. There’s also nothing harsh about fans blaming Bradley and coaching for the record. That’s how most people judge it, and that’s how fans/owners/media long have judged coaches – because it’s the most measurable gauge, and because winning is what matters in the NFL. Still, when I am asked questions, I try to answer as honestly and accurately as possible – and I usually try to not answer by simply citing a statistic or a record. So, when I am asked questions that ask me to “admit” that Bradley is an awful coach and when those questions cite his 14-47 record as evidence that he is the worst coach of all-time, I’m not going to say I agree with that … because I don’t agree with that. I also don’t agree that Bradley/coaching is the predominant reason the Jaguars are 2-11 this season. Have there been too many penalties this season? Yes. Have the Jaguars looked undisciplined because of that at times? Yes. Are there times throughout his career that I’ve disagreed with Bradley on clock-management points? Yes. But I’ve seen many, many other teams win through penalties and the occasional clock-management snafu. There were times I disagreed with Tom Coughlin’s clock management and the man is a phenomenal head coach – possibly a Hall-of-Fame coach. I can’t write that Bradley is an elite head coach because there’s no evidence to suggest that, and it’s very possible that a few better decisions might have won the Jaguars a game or two throughout his career. But is he the overwhelming reason that this franchise has won 14 games and lost 47 in his career? No. He will get blamed for it and there may be offseason change because of it, but that won’t change my view.

John from Ponte Vedra, FL:
Four years ago today, the Jaguars were 2-11. New owner, new general manager, new head coach and revamped roster – and the Jaguars are 2-11. Success in the NFL is measured by the number of wins. To date, the Khan/Caldwell/Bradley era has to be judged as a total failure. Does winning any of the remaining games change this view?
John: I have no control how anyone views or judges things, but considering the preseason expectations for this season, I doubt most people realistically will see 5-11 as being all that different from 2-14.

Justin from Jacksonville:
The Texans are at this very moment leading our division and have a real chance to make the playoffs. Yet, the Jags have scored more points (240 to 229), gained more yards (4324 to 4109) and allowed fewer yards on defense (4113 to 4141). Not to mention Blake Bortles has a better rating and seven more touchdown throws then Brock Osweiler. What it boils down to? Turnovers, John. Nasty, ugly, sickening turnovers.

John: Yes, there is that.

Zac from Gainesville, FL:
I understand that the entire team is frustrated. It also looks like the receivers have grown increasingly frustrated with Blake. A-Rob and Blake don’t appear to be on the same page or maybe even the same book. Maybe I am reading into things, but A-Rob from his body language and facial expressions following errant passes looks like he is over having BB5 as his QB. What are your thoughts on this, O-man?

John: I think Robinson is frustrated with pretty much the entire season and the entire offense. I think Bortles is frustrated with the entire season and the entire offense. Neither player’s body language has been great all the time this season, and certainly I think when you’ve misfired and as often as Bortles and Robinson have this season, there is going to be some frustration with everything. Considering that Robinson has dropped quite a few catchable passes and considering Bortles has missed quite a few complete-able passes, I think it would be more than a little understandable if somewhere deep, deep inside both were a li-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-ttle frustrated with the other once in a while.

Jay from Gainesville, FL:
I honestly feel like Myles Jack would be a better fit as a hybrid strong-safety linebacker and Dante Fowler Jr. should be the strong-side linebacker. The way Poz is playing, he has two more solid years left in the tank, and we can draft a MLB by then … your thoughts?

John: I think it’s too early to give up on Dante Fowler Jr. as a pass rusher, and because I sort of doubt the Jaguars move to a 3-4, I imagine that will mean Fowler staying at defensive end. I don’t think there’s much question the Jaguars will have Myles Jack in more of an every-down role next season. Assuming that the scheme remains a 4-3, I could see a scenario in which Jack moves to middle linebacker with Paul Posluszny at strong-side linebacker and Telvin Smith at weak-side linebacker. This would allow you essentially to have a very good middle linebacker with a very good backup middle linebacker also starting on the strong side. We’re a long way from knowing future scheme/approach. Shoot, we’re a long way from knowing a lot of things about next season, but that scenario might make some sense.

Peter from Jacksonville:
Would you agree that it makes no difference to Jaguars management if they fill EverBank with fans for the opposing team or Jag fans as long as the numbers work?

John: Nope.

Daniel Since Day One from Jacksonville:
Four years of rebuilding, and the measurable success of the project is ZERO. It’s a total meltdown disaster on special teams. It’s ridiculously bad penalty after penalty. It’s a fourth-quarter team unable to do anything against anyone (except the Bears). When David Caldwell and Gus Bradley were hired, we all had high hopes but I pointed out several times that the lack of experience by both of them was a weakness. They have not been able to develop together and regardless of what you or anyone else thinks … the FACT is we were a better team five years ago than we are this year, and our arrow was pointing up. We may have more talent, youth, depth and potential now, but we were a better team then. Caldwell should have changed coaches last year and maybe kept his job, but he didn’t. I can’t say if one or the other is the only problem, but at this point they both got to go, don’t they? Caldwell is the guy who convinced the owner that hat he had a plan, and this is not the plan Shad Khan agreed to – or what he and the fans deserve. So let’s start talking about coaches and general managers, please. I kind of doubt the Jaguars are going to determine who wins our division, but even if they do, who cares?

John: I haven’t talked much in the O-Zone about the Jaguars’ chances of determining who wins the division. That’s because I understand interest in the subject among readers is pretty minimal. I haven’t discussed coaches and general managers much, either, because right now the Jaguars have a coach and general manager – and while I understand readers’ dissatisfaction with each it’s premature to delve into replacements for either party until its clear both are going to be … you know, replaced.

Bill from Hawthorn Woods, IL:
We are looking ahead. My question to you, my fellow Arlington alum, is this: given what we have witnessed the last eight weeks, what are we looking ahead to?

John: Krimma.

O-Zone: Always

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Brian from Gainesville, FL:
Big O, what does it take to make special teams play better? A team’s top-grade talent plays on offense and defense with rare crossover. You cannot load your special teams up with starting-level players. So what does it take? Better coaching? Better evaluation of undrafted talent?

John: There’s no perfect path to big-time special teams. One path to having solid special teams is to have four-to-five players other than kicker/long snapper/punter who are special-teams specialists more than they are position players. These players are often referred to as “four-core” players because they play punt coverage, punt return, kickoff coverage and kick return – the four “core” special-teams units. It takes a high commitment level to special teams to carry four-to-five such players, and it also means finding players who are able to play special teams at a high level while also being good enough to contribute on a worthwhile level as backups on offense or defense. Coaching can and does play a role, though special teams coordinator may be the toughest job on the staff. You’re usually working with players at the bottom third/fourth of the roster – and those players are often removed from special teams to either move into starting roles or to be released when roster moves are made. The Jaguars for the most part during the past four seasons haven’t emphasized special teams with “four-core” guys. An argument can be made that that doesn’t help special teams. As good an argument can be made that the Jaguars’ special teams haven’t been good enough this season regardless of who is playing on the unit.

Scott from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:
Please explain to me how Blake Bortles can improve when for three years he stares down receivers, is horribly inaccurate and can’t throw timing routes even though he occasionally has a mediocre game and the receivers make plays. What basis do you have that he is improving? His performance in 2015 was mostly garbage time and the receivers were making difficult catches – not accurate throws. Where is your basis that he is improving or can improve? I hope you answer this question honestly.

John: I never said Bortles is improving this season. I actually have written quite often that he clearly did not make the necessary improvements from last season to this season to take the Jaguars’ offense to the level it needed to reach. Why can he improve? I don’t know that he can or will, but he did take steps between Year 1 and 2. His mechanics improved, and he had a better season in 2015 than 2014. Can he do it again? I have no idea. But that’s the basis for believing it’s possible.

Gabe from Washington, DC:
Is Myles Jack completely healthy? How can a player who the team considered to have first-round talent be getting half as many snaps as Dan Skuta? Does Dan Skuta give us a better chance to win than Myles Jack does and – if so – what does that say about Bradley’s ability to develop players? I just don’t understand why he’s still not on the field for more than half the snaps.

John: The Jaguars are splitting snaps between Skuta and Jack because they’re trying to play Skuta against “heavy” run-oriented personnel as much as possible and Jack against other personnel packages. That’s when the Jaguars are in base personnel packages. When they go to nickel looks, the Otto position that Jack and Skuta play typically comes off the field. As a result, Jack and Skuta are essentially splitting reps at a position that plays about half the time. Whatever the coaching situation next season the team must get Jack on the field more next season, but that’s why Jack is playing about half the snaps this season.

Jesse from Layton:
The Rams are not getting a head start on the Jags by kicking Jeff Fisher to the curb. The coaches a team wants to interview are still coaching somewhere, and likely will be coaching into the playoffs. The only thing the Rams gained was sending a message. Good or bad message is debatable. However, a side effect is to add a great deal of turbulence and chaos to their players on a short week. Maybe Fisher was a cancer they wanted to get out of their organization, who was sowing seeds of discontent. Whatever someone’s opinion on Gus as a coach, I don’t see him as that type of guy. Get this team to the offseason and take your time making the right decision for who leads this team in the future.

John: I don’t cover the Rams and can’t speak with any insight into why they opted to fire Fisher. I can tell you that Jaguars Owner Shad Khan’s philosophy to date is to not make a midseason coaching change in the NFL. As for the effect of such midseason changes, history suggests it’s minimal. Does it send a message? I suppose, but the only message that matters is that a team is trying to do what’s best to win for the long term. The Jaguars are doing that. They’re not succeeding at it yet, but that remains the objective – and that will be the objective when Khan makes his decisions in the offseason.

Logan from Wichita, KS:
So tell me what we have to look forward to? Another loss to a division rival that makes the loss hurt even worse? I really wish we could just cancel the game or forfeit. It’s already a loss because our offense is worthless and our defense – just like every defense to ever exist – can’t stay on the field for 45-to-50 minutes and expect to be fresh and dominate the last 10 of those minutes while being out of energy. This is where we are: Broken down, giving up, saying to hell with it because what have the Jags done lately to make us fans think or feel any different? Oh, yeah: that’s right … won two whole games… whoop-dee-do.

John: OK.

Jaginator from Section 124:
Can you please tell us when you have ever believed a team was poorly coached? Has it ever happened in the history of the NFL? Apparently, you don’t believe that 14-47 is enough to define a coach as subpar. We repeatedly get the snarky retort of, “It’s always coaching in the NFL.” So I really wonder how many games does a coach have to lose before you would admit that maybe, possibly, this one time, it really does have something to do with the coaching?

John: I have repeatedly said coaching matters in the NFL. What I also say – and firmly believe – is that coaching is far, far, far too often blamed for things because people understandably want an easy answer when things go wrong. Tom Coughlin was fired in Jacksonville and the masses wanted this. Jack Del Rio was fired in Jacksonville and the masses wanted this. Mike Mularkey was fired in Jacksonville and the masses wanted this. In the cases of Del Rio and Mularkey, the masses were sure that they were awful head coaches and that they were the problem. They were lampooned and ridiculed. The same was true, as I recall, of then-offensive coordinator Dirk Koetter. All three of those coaches left Jacksonville amid the glee and celebration of the masses. All could well be coaching playoff teams this season – and this is a common tale throughout the league and throughout the decades. Did those men make mistakes here? Sure. Were they perfect coaches? No. But they were clearly capable people and capable coaches. Is Gus Bradley a perfect coach? No. Has he made mistakes? Sure. After four years of losing he certainly has had a longer tenure than most coaches with his record. Bradley certainly has contributed to the 14-47 record, but I would say an argument could be made that the Jaguars overachieved despite winning just seven games in 2013 and 2014. The 5-11 record in 2015 probably was about right for that team. This season is a disaster and Bradley is under mammoth criticism for it – and considering the discipline/penalties at times, he does deserve some of the criticism. But is he the absolute sole reason – or even the primary reason – the team has lost so much and won so little in recent seasons? Is he the sole reason they’re 2-11 this season? Not even close. So, while it’s clear that people believe otherwise and desperately want to read otherwise in this space, I do not believe that Bradley is a horrendous coach solely responsible for 2-11 or 14-47 – despite the fact that it’s always coaching in the NFL.

O-Zone: Days gone by

JACKSONVILLE – Look-Ahead Wednesday? Already? Why, yes it is.

Let’s get to it …

Jason from St. Augustine, FL:
Been a huge fan since ‘95. I have nothing but respect and admiration for Coach Gus and I was super-excited about possibly having a franchise quarterback in Blake Bortles. After this season, I have no clue how anyone can say how either one should stay with the team. I believe we have a great nucleus; special teams is easily fixed with coaching. Unfortunately, finding a great head coach and franchise quarterback are not. That’s what worries me going forward.

John: Finding “great” anythings is difficult. That’s particularly true in professional sports because teams don’t often let people who are great at what they do go willingly, so you must project and speculate whether you think someone will become great when hiring or drafting them. As far as why Bortles should stay with the team, the reason is that while he has struggled in what he has correctly called a “nightmare” season, it’s difficult to know if those struggles are all him or if other factors such as route running, miscommunications, pass rush, play-calling, scheme, lack of running game, etc., etc., etc. are contributing. The body of work this season is not good, but the NFL is rarely just one thing – and there are factors that contribute to any player’s success or failures. He also has shown enough in three seasons that it’s not completely unreasonable to believe he can become a good quarterback. The guess here is he will have at least another offseason – and very possible another season – to show he can become that. Considering the difficulty of finding a great player at the position, it makes sense to at least give him a chance to be in competition for the starting quarterback job. Will he develop into a great quarterback? Who knows? But I don’t believe his window has closed – and I believe he can and should get that opportunity here.

Adam from St. Johns, FL:
With all three phases of the game failing, it’s just another strike against Bradley. Yet another way to lose. It’s ridiculous at this point to blame it on anything but coaching.

John: It’s always coaching in the NFL. It’s ridiculous to think otherwise.

Brian from Section 238:
He calls the snap count, but can’t remember it less than 15 seconds later. We might as well call him Blaike Gartles.

John: Things are a mess right now. What many players on this team need is a chance to get into the offseason, reset and restart. It has been that kind of month and that kind of season.

Otto from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:
John, how much of the D’s resurgence can be attributed to Monte Kiffin’s input?

John: Having Kiffin on staff certainly hasn’t hurt. He is a wise head who has seen and forgotten more about defense than many NFL coaches know. But the Jaguars have improved the talent on defense this season, and these players believe strongly in Todd Wash as coordinator. Don’t overlook those last two factors.

Aaron from White Hall, AR:
How come after a safety they punt the ball for the kickoff instead of just doing a regular kickoff?

John: Better hang time.

Jimmy from Section 007:
Part of me understands our ownership making not make a coaching change midseason. Another part of me continues to watch the same, if not worse, lack of attention to detail and wonders if ownership realizes our tickets have been devalued by that decision. Our coaches, players and fans have been in a “lame-duck” situation since that decision. Our stadium has been taken over by the visiting team and we can’t announce the offense during pregame anymore in fear of thunderous boos. Most business entities can’t afford this kind sustained inferior performance. The NFL is obviously different, but I continue to show up in hopes of a return on my investment, only to leave after taking my weekly swift kick in the gut by this organization.

John: Ownership and the people running the Jaguars’ organization well understand that these are brutally tough times for fans. It ain’t easy for the organization, either. Right now it’s a matter of getting through this time and figuring out the plan moving forward. That doesn’t make this time pleasant. It doesn’t make it less dark. But it won’t last forever. It just won’t.

Ethan from Rhode Island:
If Gus goes, I’ll be 50/50 on how to feel: excited for the future, disappointed that the players will have to move on to a new voice, just as they seemed to be truly hearing it. If he’s let go, I worry the new coach would likely install a new offense and start this thing all over again. Or even worse, bring in a new defensive coordinator and kill the progress on that side of the ball. Would you see Dave Caldwell (if he hires a new coach) keeping Todd Wash and/or Nathaniel Hackett on board as part of the deal?

John: I don’t know what the offseason will bring. I wish I did.

Brian from Staten Island, NY:
You wrote recently that you don’t see Julius Thomas coming back next year. Do you think Ben Koyack has shown enough in a small sample size that he can be an effective pass-catching tight end in this league, and where will they leave Marcedes Lewis in this scheme?

John: I don’t know what the offseason will bring. I wish I did. But I do think that Ben Koyack and Neal Sterling are starting to show serious signs of being quality NFL tight ends – and I don’t think Marcedes Lewis is done with this organization.

Jeff from Jacksonville:
This is a team playing in quicksand.

John: It has felt that way at times this season.

Duh from Jacksonville:
Not every pass rusher is unpolished his rookie season. See: Von Miller, 11.5 sacks.

John: I’ve never said every pass rusher is unpolished his rookie season. See: Pretty much every time I’ve talked about rookie pass rushers.

Sebastian from Poland:
Rams fired Fisher after giving him a contract extension a couple of weeks ago. I guess they don’t agree with letting the team burn until all movement has stopped and there is no sign of life. You gotta ride these things out to the end, right John?

John: You don’t gotta do anything. Shad Khan has chosen this path and he doesn’t believe in midseason coaching changes. What the Rams do has no bearing on that decision. Nor should it.

Robert from Kentucky:
But there was a polished pass rusher at the top of the draft last year. One that had far superior athleticism and college production than Fowler, one that is now leading the NFL with 13.5 sacks and 7 forced fumbles in just his second season.

John: OK.

Cathy from Jacksonville Beach, FL:
Are the Jaguars coaches misusing some players? For example, I can’t understand why Myles Jack is hardly ever on the field while Dan Skuta gets the majority of snaps. Secondly, were Julius Thomas’s skills properly utilized before he went to injured reserve? It seems like the Jags coaches tried to make him into an overweight blocking tight end who ran short routes when he had great success as a receiving tight end running longer routes. Do you agree?

John: Jack and Skuta have pretty much split snaps since Jack took over as the starter. Skuta did get 23 snaps compared to 12 for Jack against the Vikings, but the thought process behind that was to play Skuta against “heavy personnel” – and the Vikings were in that personnel enough that Skuta got the majority of the snaps. As far as Thomas, coaches did not try to make him a blocking tight end. They wanted him to be a receiving tight end and an integral part of the offense. The integral part did not happen, although it wasn’t for a lack of desire on the part of either party.

Steve from Hudson, FL:
I still see effort. These young men will be special if we can keep them together and we show patience. It’s hard for all.

John: Effort isn’t the issue and it never has been under Bradley. But right now, the Jaguars are 2-11 and effort isn’t enough. Winning was needed, and it hasn’t happened.

Grant from Chicago, IL:
Seems like with free agents like Jared Odrick and Julius Thomas out the door along with the coaching staff … could be another Jaguars overhaul all over again. O-Man, you excited?!? New content to spin!!

John: Whatever happens in the offseason I don’t think this roster will need an overhaul close to the extent that took place in 2013. As far as my excitement level over what takes place this offseason, I don’t know … I’ll probably just keep answering questions to the best of my ability as honestly as I can – you know, what I usually do.

Andy from Jacksonville:
Tonight I watched old Jags highlights on the YouTube. My girlfriend said it was like watching old wedding videos just after getting divorced. I told her it was not about crying about the past, but getting fired up for the future. DTWD

John: Last night I watched old girlfriend highlights on YouTube. My wife told me it was like watching old girlfriend highlights just before getting divorced. “What?” I said. “Nothing,” she said.