Uncategorized Archives - Page 294 of 304

O-Zone: Impressive stuff

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Brian from Gainesville, FL:

Big O, will Coach Marrone, Hackett and Wash get another four years to achieve success? Please don’t think this question is all snark. The truth is Shad Khan, for better or worse, clearly believes in giving his folks time to realize their visions. Now that it’s a new vision, will Marrone have multiple years to see it through?

John: I imagine Jaguars Owner Shad Khan will be asked some sort of time-frame question Thursday at the press conference to introduce Tom Coughlin as executive vice president of football operations and Doug Marrone as head coach. Until Khan answers that question, we won’t know for certain – but I seriously doubt Khan is expecting to wait four more seasons to win. This is a much different situation than when Gus Bradley and David Caldwell took over as head coach and general manager, respectively, in 2013. That was perceived as a major rebuild and a resetting of the very foundation of the roster. This 2017 version is a team that appears to be talented at many positions and that therefore appears capable of winning relatively quickly.

Jeff from Jacksonville:

Jason Garrett was an interim coach when he was hired full-time by the Dallas Cowboys and he’s probably about to win coach of the year. Just because you work for someone else’s staff doesn’t mean you have the same philosophy. It also helps to have guys like Romo and Prescott at QB making you look good.

John: Yes. Yes.

Seth from Denver, CO:

When I first heard the news about Marrone being hired as HC, my reaction was “meh.” Then I got a little disappointed, having hoped for Mike Smith. Finally, I realized there’s a really positive, seemingly overlooked benefit to retaining Marrone and the rest of the staff: continuity. Haven’t we been complaining about how has had multiple offensive coordinators and how that is not ideal for his development, having to learn a new system every year? Well, now it looks like he’ll finally have the same offensive coordinator two years in a row. That has to be good, right?

John: How much continuity the Jaguars do or don’t have entering next season will largely depend on the identity of the Jaguars’ offensive and defensive coordinators. I’m in no way ruling out Nathaniel Hackett as offensive coordinator or Todd Wash as defensive coordinator. They are capable young coaches and the logic behind keeping them in their current positions is sound. At the same time, the Jaguars have not announced their coaching staff yet. When they do so, I’ll be in a better position to discuss continuity.

Tommy from Corona, CA:

This just in: Accountability just walked through the front door. LOVE these moves!

John: The Jaguars almost certainly will have a hard edge with Coughlin as executive vice president of football operations and Marrone as head coach. Players will know what is expected and there will be no doubt about rules and consequences. There will be a more intense feel around the Jaguars on that front.

Daniel from Honolulu, HI:

Why all the negativity from the fan base on the promotion of Marrone? No one knows what he will bring as a head coach – and certainly no one can predict how successful he will be. The other question I have is about the so-called good defense we had last season. They were in the Top 10 in fewest yards allowed, but they were in the bottom of the league in points allowed. I’d rather have them give more yards than points; you still can win that way.

John: Why all the negativity from the fan base? Because Marrone was part of a staff that won eight games over the last two seasons, so there’s naturally a lot of guilt by association – and because many people were hoping the Jaguars would hire one of the Hot Candidates of the 2017 Offseason. As far as what Marrone will bring as a head coach, I actually think we do know. He’ll bring a harder, old-school edge, attention to detail; professionalism, a head-coach demeanor, leadership, and a resume that shows he can win in the NFL. Those things don’t automatically make you a great head coach, but they sure are qualities that can help. I also believe Marrone will inspire confidence and belief among players, and that he knows how to run an NFL organization. As far as the defense last season, I wouldn’t call it a “so-called” good defense; I would call it a good NFL defense. It certainly was an improved one from the previous season. What it wasn’t was an elite defense. That’s because it struggled to get pressure on the passer in key situations and didn’t force turnovers. Those are areas in which the defense must improve.

Kenny from Rochester, NY:

It feels good being the laughingstock of the national media again. Last year’s optimism was weird and didn’t feel right. We are back to where we are supposed to be and it is a good feeling isn’t it?

John: I know many people in the national media. I consider many of them friends. Frankly, what they find amusing concerns me not in the least. Unless they think Dane Cook is funny. Then, I just don’t know what’s going on.

Rusty from New Iberia, LA:

Do you think Gus Bradley will ever be a head coach again, or was his reputation completely ruined by this team?

John: I think it will be very, very difficult for a team to hire Bradley as a head coach because of his record here. Then again, I thought it would be difficult for Jack Del Rio to get another opportunity and I thought it would be very, very difficult for Mike Mularkey to get another opportunity. The NFL is a weird league in which it’s difficult to predict the future. Do I believe Bradley will get another opportunity to be a head coach? Probably not. Is it conceivable? Sure.

Steve from Jacksonville:

My question is about scouting. When a scout is “scouting” a college team, does he have direction from his NFL team to scout a particular quarterback, running back, etc. or is he looking at all of the players for the next projected Pro Bowl player?

John: Area scouts are assigned to college teams, usually by conferences or areas of the country. They are expected to scout and know all draft-eligible players at those schools.

Dave from Duval:

O-Zone, TC IS IN THE HOUSE!! That is what is “different” and “splashy.” The Jaguars have completely restructured their football operations and hired a sure Hall of Famer with two Super Bowl Rings – and he is really the ultimate Mr. Jaguar. Doug Marrone is as qualified a candidate as anybody interviewed. David Caldwell gets to learn from TC. Blake Bortles has one year to prove himself or we draft a quarterback in a quarterback-loaded 2018 class. It’s all good!

John: #TCTWD

Chad from EverBank:

Whether you like it, or hate it, the organization made a coaching decision. What is important is that the team now has a voice to dictate its direction. I’m a Jaguar, so I was going to support their decision, regardless of the candidate. I did immediately question how the Coughlin hiring affects his ability to be welcomed into the Hall of Fame. Does this push his five-year waiting period out, or has it already started?

John: The five-year waiting period for the Hall of Fame applies to players and coaches. It doesn’t not apply to contributors. So unless Coughlin returns to the sidelines as a coach, his clock will be based on his final season coaching the New York Giants: 2015.

Wild Bill from Riverside:

Do you think Coughlin will wear a 20-year old, original Jaguars logo polo when he gives his initial press conference???

John: I doubt it, but I’ll probably be wearing the 11-year-old blazer that I wear for most of the O-Zone video mailbags. And a bobby hat. Or a Santa Hat. Yeah, probably the Santa hat.

E Nuff from Banner Elk, NC:

Austin from Green Bay’s conclusion is spot on. Several reliable sources have noted that no one – I repeat, no one – was interested in the Jags job with Blake Bortles at quarterback. So just as everyone suspects –Marrone got the job by default! Enough of the media spin: this is the worst-case scenario. Unless they bring in an A.J. McCarron or someone of the sort (by the way can play circles around Blake Bortles). The Jags are doomed to another sub.-500 season and another complete overhaul! Thanks Dave Caldwell.

John: You can repeat – I repeat, repeat – whatever you want as often as you want. But I fear your reliable sources aren’t so reliable. Marrone was not the only candidate for the position, nor was he the only coach who wanted the position. This also was not the only position for which Marrone was a candidate. That said, your confidence in your beliefs and conviction in your words is impressive. Being impressive, alas, is not always the same as being correct.

Pages: 12

O-Zone: Clear conclusion

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Dave from Dferris:

I’m pretty bummed, John. I was really hoping that Shad and the front office finally “got it” with this past nightmare of a season. However, we are going to roll into the 2017 season with the same quarterback, offensive coordinator and defensive coordinator that brought us one win in the last half of 2016. Really?!? Continuity with losing is NOT a good thing! It looks just like an extension of the last four years!!! Whatever – I guess us dumb fans should just shut up and leave it to the “football guys” who know so much more than us. Right.

John: I don’t consider fans dumb, and I don’t think they should shut up. What I do think is that we need to wait a few days to get a clearer idea of what Tuesday’s reported changes will mean. It has been reported that Nathaniel Hackett will return as offensive coordinator and that Todd Wash return as defensive coordinator. What isn’t yet known is how much Hackett and Wash will change their respective schemes. Hackett took over as offensive coordinator with nine games remaining this past season and never had time to overhaul former coordinator Greg Olson’s system, so I expect there to be at least some noticeable change there. Wash ran Head Coach Gus Bradley’s Seattle-based single-high, hybrid-Leo-Otto-based scheme this past season and believed in a lot of what that defense did. How much will Wash change the scheme? That’s a key storyline. Also key is the team’s stance on quarterback . Will competition be brought in? How serious will that competition be? We’re a few days into this thing, and there are a lot of unknowns. Until more is known we won’t know the extent of the continuity you seem to dislike so much.

Don from Ponte Vedra, FL:

You’re talking about a coach who beat Bill Belichick twice in the Super Bowl and ended one perfect season with less talent. He is a legend and it would be a wise thing to listen to him because he knows what he is talking about. How is that a bad move? Doug Marrone will be the next great coach in the league if Tom gets his way. You make it work! That’s the secret. Go Jags!

John: #TCTWD

Mike from Atlanta, GA:

Will the defense continue playing with a single-high safety, or two deep safeties? Do you have a sniff of this yet, or should I check back in a couple weeks?

John: This is one of the key issues to be addressed in the coming days and weeks, and I imagine it will be asked of Head Coach Doug Marrone at the introductory press conference Thursday morning. I expect there will be changes to the defense even with Wash returning as coordinator. I expect we will stop hearing about Otto and Lotto linebackers, and I’d be a little surprised if we hear too much more talk about Leo pass rushers. I don’t have as much of a feel for how Wash will ask the secondary to play. How much will change about the defense remains to be seen. Wash has spent a lot of time working with the defense, but he also has worked in different schemes … so yeah, I expect change. The question is how much.

TJ from Orlando, FL:

Oh, snap: Papa Tom’s home and he has more power than last time. I hope everyone is ready for this. Better be doing their homework this offseason. I, for one, love it.

John: I’m all for “Papa Tom” being home, though I’ll probably drop the “Papa” when I see him and just address him in normal fashion (I’d advise all others to do the same, incidentally). And it indeed will be intriguing to follow Tom Coughlin’s progress as he again puts his stamp on the Jaguars’ organization. But let’s not rewrite history: however much power Coughlin has within the Jaguars’ organization as this moves forward he will not have more power than he did in his last tenure with the Jaguars – that is, unless he owns the team.

Paul Paul from Duval:

What have the Jaguars done in the past decade that would warrant any sense of optimism? I don’t think success is inevitable. I don’t “know” football. Shad Khan is an amazing businessman who has done plenty for Jacksonville and built great infrastructure around the team, but when I saw what happened Monday all I felt was hollow. What needs to happen to turn this feeling around? Winning? Yes, but if it goes like it always does … ah crap … I’m writing O-Zone again. Shoot me.

John: You’re not alone in your feelings, and those feelings are understandable. The Jaguars have lost so much and so consistently in recent seasons that many fans wanted complete change this offseason. Many of those fans now feel hollow in the wake of Monday’s moves and they seem to be waiting to see how the team will perform before getting excited. That all makes sense. The Jaguars for the last decade have earned those feelings of ambivalence, and they really have earned it over the last half-decade. So much has gone wrong and hope has proven so false so often that it would be really, really weird if many people didn’t have doubts about the team’s moves. The only thing that will earn people’s faith will be winning. That’s what it will take. And you know what? That’s OK. That’s what it’s supposed to take.

Steve from Jacksonville:

Would it be fair to assume that the “Super Bowl-winning coach who suggested hiring Marrone” was in fact, Coughlin? If so, I consider that all the praise and recommendation I need at the moment to feel at least pretty good about the choice.

John: You’re referring to a media report late last week that a Super Bowl-winning coach suggested to the Jaguars they hire Marrone as head coach. I rarely assume anything because I don’t want to … well, you know the rest. But I had to guess … well, yeah.

Miguel from Section 144 and Duuuvallll!!!:

I’m glad the Shad Khan had the courage to make his own decision on the next coach (it is his team, after all!). It’s not the sexy or splashy pick, but I believe Coach Marrone – from what he has shown us since becoming the interim coach – has the fortitude and ability to command the position. I think the fact that multiple teams were wanting interviews shows us his value around the league. Familiarity and proximity can taint fans appreciation of in-house coaches abilities i.e. all former Jaguars coaches having success in the league right now. One ‘fer Khaaaaaaan! #DTWD

John: Interim head coaches in the NFL are rarely the popular choice. That’s because interim head coaches are usually promoted from a staff that has played poorly enough that the former head coach is no longer there. But that doesn’t make interim head coaches poor choices. It’s equally true that “sexy,” “splashy” hires have a guarantee of being good hires than unpopular ones. Marrone’s resume and history suggests he is very capable of the job at hand. How the team will fare is anyone’s guess and depends on the Jaguars’ improving in a lot of areas next season. Those areas include pass rush, quarterback play, turnovers and running game. What will the Jaguars do to improve the areas? How much will the areas improve? Those are some of the primary storylines of the offseason and next season. We’ll see.

Brian from Gainesville, FL:

Big O, you recently answered the following: “I expect Bortles to have to compete to be the Jaguars’ starting quarterback next season and ultimately I expect him to be the starting quarterback next season.” Is this because the competition won’t be serious given how Caldwell liked Marrone’s “belief” in Bortles?

John: I believe Bortles will be the starting quarterback because I believe the Jaguars will have a difficult time signing a player who is clearly better than him. You’re probably talking about quarterbacks along the lines of A.J. McCarron and/or Tyrod Taylor. Or Jay Cutler. Or Brian Hoyer or Ryan Fitzpatrick. If the competition doesn’t come from that group, it probably would be from a player around the level of those players. Those players aren’t elite, but they likely would come at a very high price. Will that be a price worth paying? My gut right now is that the leadership of the Jaguars’ organization believes Bortles is capable of developing into a winning quarterback – and that obviously also will play a role in the direction moving forward. We’ll find out more on this Thursday. Stay tuned.

Austin from Green Bay, WI:

John, so the Jaguars fire Gus Bradley two weeks before the end of the season because they say they want to start the coaching search early. They then end up hiring a guy in-house and don’t wait until Josh McDaniels and some of the coaches whose seasons aren’t over are available to interview. It sounds like to me that Caldwell knew not many people were too interested in the Jaguars job. …

John: Many people are drawing that conclusion. It’s not a correct conclusion, but it’s one that’s often drawn when a team hires a coach who wasn’t considered The Hot Candidate of the Offseason. If Marrone wins, it will be a good hire. If not, it won’t. That’s how the NFL works.

Pages: 12

O-Zone: Judgment day

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Trevor from Jacksonville:

Same ole Jags (literally) … Sigh

John: This was a common refrain among readers Monday evening, and I understand the sentiment: I really do. I realize because Doug Marrone was the interim head coach, there is a strong feeling among Jaguars fans/observers that assigning him the position permanently doesn’t signal a monstrous change/overhaul. But remember a couple of things: one, Marrone absolutely is a qualified candidate who was going to be a head coach in the NFL relatively soon; and two, he absolutely has a different approach than former Jaguars Head Coach Gus Bradley. He is older-school, more traditional and more of a no-nonsense guy. The job of an NFL head coach is to run the team, set the tone and establish the direction of the franchise – and I don’t doubt for a minute Marrone can do those things. He showed during his two-week interim status that is he more than comfortable in the head-coaching role. The most intriguing question involves his coordinators. I would be surprised if he doesn’t retain Nathaniel Hackett as offensive coordinator, and early reports are that he could retain defensive coordinator Todd Wash. Does that mean the status quo? Perhaps not. Hackett this past season took over Greg Olson’s offense with nine games remaining, so while he tweaked the scheme after that, it was not really “his” offense. So, I doubt the offense will be status quo. As far as Wash and the defense … we’ll see. If he does remain, how much will he change? That is an important question that as yet remains unanswered.

T Revor from 133:

I LIKE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!

John: Thanks. I have a pair of pants the same color.

JT from Jacksonville:

With reports out that the Jags will retain the defensive coaching staff, does there need to be some backpedaling from all the players that were bashing those coaches after the season ended? This sounds messy to say the least.

John: Things get said at the end of disappointing seasons. People talk things out, and because players and coaches are “people,” they talk out – whatever issues may linger. Will it be a little awkward? Perhaps, but I doubt it will be a huge issue. Coaches coach and players play. I imagine whatever mess exists can be cleaned up remembering that.

Scott from Aurora, IL:

Feels like a punt.

John: It’s understandable it feels that way. You don’t make a move like this for offseason splash; you make it to win in the regular season. If the Jaguars lose next season, it will be a punt. If they win, it will feel like the splish-, splash-iest hire in NFL history.

Ryan from Largo, FL:

I like the reported Marrone hire. However, I read that the defensive staff will stay. Their stats were good, but how would you see the players’ comments after the season affecting this decision.

John: I wrote at the time the players made the comments that I doubted much if any of what they said would impact the decision regarding the coaching staff’s future. I believed that then and I believe it now. You don’t make decisions on NFL head coaches or staffs based on players’ comments in the media. You make them based on coaches’ ability to coach. This was a staff that for the most part this past season did a good job with a defense that was marked by turnover and new, young players. If the staff stays, a very strong case can be made that the coaches deserved the opportunity.

Joshua from Virginia Beach, VA:

Will remain the starting quarterback?

John: That remains to be seen, and it’s certain to be one of the primary topics of Thursday’s press conference with Tom Coughlin, Doug Marrone and David Caldwell. I expect Bortles to have to compete to be the Jaguars’ starting quarterback next season and ultimately I expect him to be the starting quarterback next season.

Steve from Atlanta, GA:

It appears that Mr. Khan really did think it was coaching after all, huh? I mean if the only difference next year is the absence of Gus, it seems to point that way. Your argument that it wasn’t coaching takes a major shot here.

John: It’s always coaching in the NFL. I think I’ve been pretty consistent on that front.

Chris from Jacksonville:

Can I go ahead and answer a question instead of asking? We at Jaguars.com did not report on the Jaguars signing Coughlin and Marrone first because it is our policy to not report on signings until, well, they have actually signed.

John:
Correct.

Dave from Jacksonville:

Please answer this question seriously: What changes have occurred that should provide hope for us long-suffering fans? It appears that there will only be one change on the coaching staff (a promotion), and you have drilled into our heads that coaching doesn’t matter anyway. The roster will not undergo an overhaul (the GM’s contract was extended), and the dysfunctional quarterback will keep his starting role. In all seriousness, why should we hope for a better record in the near future?

John: The biggest reason to hope for a better record in the near future is that this team was very close to winning a lot of games this past season, which could mean that what is needed is more of a tweak and an adjustment than a major overhaul. This thought process likely will draw outrage in some circles, but I can’t control that; I can only write what I believe. Marrone appeared to have the confidence of players late in the season. They appeared to believe in his direction. The offense also appeared to be more effective at times in the final two games; perhaps that was a result of Marrone and Hackett dictating the offense with more authority and with more control than they had been able to do under Bradley. Those are reasons to believe the Jaguars could be improved next season. But the biggest factors continue to be quarterback play, turnovers, run game and pass rush. Improving those areas remain critical.

Logan from Wichita, KS:

I have zero hope for the future of the Jaguars. Reasonable expectations for next year in my mind is four wins. Get there and I will be shocked. Anything more than that and hell might freeze over. That is how pathetic this team has been the last six years.

John: If I’m reading your email correctly, it seems you feel pretty good about the future of the Jaguars.

James from Grand Ridge, FL:

Your thoughts on the NFL banning a suspended player (I think on like the third-time violation) from the team’s building. I can understand the ‘punishment;’ however, wouldn’t it benefit the player’s rehab to have the structure and support of the team more than a weekly phone call if player is sincere in wanting to stop his addiction or behavior?

John: NFL rules currently mandate that players suspended under the substance-abuse policy can remain with the team during the “initial” four-game suspension but not on subsequent suspensions. A player suspended under the performance-enhancing-substances policy can’t be around the facility. I believe the more players can be around the facility the better, though once they get to the one-year level it indeed has reached a point where perhaps an outside approach – and separation from the league – is needed and warranted.

Doug from Jacksonville:

I wish I spent more time watching highlight reels on YouTube, then I could talk about “watching game film.” I wish I was proficient in “Madden,” then I could talk intelligently about play-calling. I wish I had clamored for to be cut the last two years like all the other general managers writing in so I could … oh, wait. Well, I guess I won’t call for Bortles to be cut. I won’t demand anything except what I can only assume Khan is doing … putting together the best people for success. I may wait a year to renew my season tickets since it hasn’t even been fun to go to EverBank, but that’s still up in the air. I wish I had the conviction of people who can make categorical demands like “Cut Bortles” or “Draft Manziel,” but I don’t have the info the general manager does. So, I feel like it would show my ignorance to make such demands.

John: Madden’s cool. People like it.

Gamble from Brasilia, Brasil:

You know why few diehard fans are excited about Marrone? Because this had to be his narrative: “Yes, the Jaguars have been on a historic run of losing and incompetence while I was the assistant head coach — but I was handcuffed and watched helplessly the last two years as Bradley alone crushed dreams.” Is that and 15-17 a winning argument?

John: I’m guessing Shad Khan was less concerned about offseason narrative and more concerned about trying to structure the organization in the best possible manner and trying to find the best possible head coach. The narrative will give way to reality once the season begins. That’s how Monday eventually will be judged.

Pages: 12

O-Zone: Impossible scenario

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Gary from St. Augustine, FL:

The Jaguars’ interview with Josh McDaniels reportedly went well. How would you handicap the head-coaching search right now?

John: Mike Smith, Doug Marrone, Kyle Shanahan, Josh McDaniels. That’s based on media reports and my understanding of what the Jaguars are looking for in this search. These are all qualified candidates with strong arguments. Smith and Marrone have head-coaching experience and have won in the NFL. Shanahan has had success in different situations. McDaniels has a strong argument as perhaps the hottest candidate of the offseason. I’m still leaning toward Smith being the Jaguars’ next head coach. He feels like the right combination of experience, leadership, past success, etc. Stay tuned.

Jeremy from Dodge City, KS:

Am I the only fan left that feels optimistic?? It seems like everyone is feeling the “All is lost moment.” I feel excited about getting a new head coach and I feel this team is going to do great next year!!! PLAYOFFS!

John: #DTWD

Robert from Moorpark, CA:

Anyway you see Tyrod Taylor being snagged by the Jags in the offseason? Please help make this happen, Zone.

John: Tyrod Taylor indeed is the sort of quarterback who theoretically could be brought in as competition for . He is experienced, has had success and it appears he may be available. He also has a strong arm and can make plays with his legs. The question about Taylor and the Jaguars is the same question as about any quarterback and the Jaguars: what role is the team envisioning him playing, and what role does he want? Would a player such as Taylor come to Jacksonville to compete with Bortles? Would the Jaguars pay as much as a player such as Taylor might demand if he’s not coming in as the starter? Those are serious issues to consider. And they’re the reason that while bringing in competition for Bortles sounds logical, finding the right competition could be easier said than done.

Marcus from Jacksonville:

If the Jags decide to retain at left guard, do you think there will be any hesitation from him accepting a left-guard contract, or do you think he might try to pursue a move to a team that would let him play left tackle? That’s a big pay cut if he thinks he can still play tackle.

John: Because of his knee injury this past season, Joeckel may not be in a position to dictate terms this offseason. I easily could see a scenario under which Joeckel signs a one-year deal and agrees to play guard with the Jaguars. If he plays well and remains healthy that could lead to an opportunity somewhere at left tackle.

Dave from Duval:

What a conundrum. If Doug Marrone had been named interim head coach after the Tennessee game, you could have gotten the best assessment possible of Marrone for nine games. That would be some handy info to go off of now to help with your decision. This franchise has been plagued by bad decision after bad decision. Bottom line.

John: People are making a big deal out of the issue – probably bigger than necessary. The Jaguars have been around Marrone for two seasons. David Caldwell and Shad and Tony Khan have a good idea what he is about. He also has a resume that includes two seasons as an NFL head coach and four seasons as a collegiate head coach. He clearly showed in the final two weeks of the season that he can handle himself as a head coach and handle the leadership role. An NFL head coach isn’t a magician. He’s rarely a cure all. We saw that in the final two games of the season. Marrone did a very good job. The Jaguars were focused and inspired and motivated. They won one game and lost the other. Had a few things gone right in one of the games they could have gone 2-0. Had a few things gone wrong in the other they might have gone 0-2. Had Marrone had taken over with nine games remaining and reeled off a 6-3 record, then yeah … the decision might well have been easy. But what if he had gone 4-5? Or 5-4? Would the losses have been his “fault” and made him a bad candidate? Did the loss to the Colts in Indianapolis make him a bad candidate? Marrone is a good candidate for the Jaguars’ head coaching position. That’s true no matter how long he held the interim head-coaching position.

Fred from Naples, FL:

You hear a lot of rumors about certain coaching candidates for the Jaguars being concerned about the quarterback situation here and the risk of Blake really being a franchise guy. How do you think Doug Marrone feels about Blake? Do you sense concern on his end? I just think we are going to end up with Doug … and I would be OK with that.

John: I think very few head-coaching candidates entered the interview process 100 percent confident in Bortles as a franchise quarterback. Bortles in three NFL seasons hasn’t played well enough consistently enough to earn that level of confidence. I imagine in his heart of heart of hearts he has the same concerns, but Marrone also has been around the Jaguars and around Jaguars offensive coordinator Nathaniel Hackett enough to see things in Bortles that can develop and be built upon.

Mark from Archer, FL:

John, count me among those who hope we do not make Doug Marrone the new head coach. If you retain him you have the possibility that he retains the coaching staff. While everyone blames Bradley, I believe the whole coaching staff should be blamed. Personally I want a completely fresh start from the current coaches.

John: Yes, blame all of the coaches. Every #@%&*$d one of them. Because it’s always coaching in the NFL.

Jim from Meridian, ID:

John: Despite the fact you never respond to my comments, I love reading the daily back and forth banter. People are very passionate about this team, which is cool. I like it. My question: What’s your relationship with Jerell from S. Carolina?

John: I haven’t spoken to Jerell since the last time our families vacationed together. It is now known as the Little Debbie Star Crunch Incident, and my wife and son know better than to bring it up.

JG from Silver Spring, MD:

Hi John. Regarding Bortles, according to Pro Football Reference, there have been 38 35-plus-touchdown seasons in NFL history. By my count, 28 of those seasons were put together by quarterbacks who are in the Hall of Fame or are near-locks. Also, only three QBs have achieved this before turning 24: Dan Marino, Matthew Stafford and Bortles. Obviously this year was a regression, but I really hope we get to see whether Bortles can fulfill his potential. It would be nice to be able to look back at 2016 as a stumbling block on the way to something great. Happy New Year.

John: Bortles will get a chance to show he should be the Jaguars’ starting quarterback. That doesn’t mean he automatically be anointed the starter, but if he deserves to start he will start.

Tyler from Jacksonville:

I believe Doug Marrone did a great job as interim coach. He said more in two weeks of press conferences than Gus did in 200 weeks or so. He grabbed leads in his only two games that would rank among Gus’s Top 3 leads in 62 games. But no way can he be the coach because it is a faithless, uninspiring hire. If the team’s brass thought Marrone was an upgrade, they would have given him more time to prove himself. A Marrone hiring signals that Dave Caldwell is on thin-enough ice that a sub-par 2017 results in a full-clean house akin to the Gene Smith/Mike Mularkey pairing. I suppose that is the reality of the situation but with a Shanahan hire, amongst others, it would mean that it was possible for the coach to outlast the GM and use 2017 to kick start installing his own system.

John: The hiring of the next head coach shouldn’t be about signals or faith or inspiration. It should be about hiring the best head coach. If that’s Marrone, hire him. If not, don’t.

Stephen from Jacksonville:

One thing we learned last season was that teams with a dominant defense and smart, average quarterback play can still win championships. Is there any chance the Jaguars focus mainly on improving the defense again in this year’s draft? There are seemingly already several pieces in place that would enable the defense to be very good in the near future (, , , and ). If the right talent is available when the Jaguars select, are you in favor of trying to build an elite defense through the 2017 draft class? Aside from pass rushers, where do the Jaguars need the most help on the defensive side of the ball?

John: You can’t be too dominant at pass rusher or anywhere on the defensive front.

Pages: 12

O-Zone: Well-coordinated

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Jeremy from Wise, VA:

If it was up to you, using only the information you have right now (i.e. no interview, so forth), out of the candidates being associated with the opening, what candidate would you hire as head coach and why?

John: I’ve said from the beginning of this process that I don’t know that there’s a clear-cut best choice. That’s because all of the candidates being mentioned – Mike Smith, Josh McDaniels, Kyle Shanahan, Doug Marrone, Tom Coughlin, Harold Goodwin and Anthony Lynn – appear very capable of leading the team, earning the respect of players and creating an environment in which the team can be successful. Those are the key traits for a head coach. If they go the coordinator route I like the idea of Shanahan because he seems to be a bright, young mind who has been successful in multiple situations. I admit am a little partial in this search to a head coach who previously has had success. That’s because this team is still young and in need of a reset, and an experienced coach with a resume of success could garner immediate respect under those circumstances. Smith and Marrone clearly both have those traits, as does Coughlin. I doubt Coughlin is the guy at this point, so go with Smith in my scenario – though I have a hard time saying that there’s a mammoth difference between him and Marrone.

Mike from West Palm Beach, FL:

It appears to me the offensive line needs some serious work. Not only could they not protect , but there were not enough holes for our running backs. There were some games that the running game was OK, but was a disappointment. Do you think the Jags should concentrate on the offensive line this offseason and the draft?

John: I agree that the Jaguars’ offensive line needs to be addressed in the offseason. The question is whether it needs an overhaul or a tweak. The guess is it’s more of a tweak with perhaps two positions addressed. The Jaguars need to determine if is the right tackle moving forward, and they need to determine if they will move forward with at left tackle. I’m not sure on Parnell and I imagine the Jaguars will retain Beachum. The other issue is left guard … will they re-sign to play there, or will they go another direction? But keep one thing in perspective: while the Jaguars indeed struggled to run this past season – and while much of that was because the line struggled to run block – the Jaguars were a vastly improved pass-blocking unit, improving from 71 sacks allowed in 2014 to 51 in 2015 to 34 this past season. The Jaguars weren’t the league’s best pass-blocking line, but for the most part the line blocked more than well enough for the passing game to function.

Aaron from Chantilly:

I know Blake Bortles is candid, and that’s refreshing to some extent, but they are still excuses. That line of thinking is only going to enable him.

John: If Bortles doesn’t develop into a frontline NFL starter candidness won’t be the reason.

MrPadre from Kingsland, GA:

In regards to Jaginator’s comparison to the Bucs losing for draft position, there’s a HUGE difference between playing backups and “trying” to lose. Tanking is when you are trying to lose the game by not performing at your best on purpose. Removing your starters and allowing others to play is not the same thing … just thought I’d put that out there. #DTWD

John: Well, it’s kinda, sorta the same, but you’re right: it’s a little different.

Travis from North Dakota:

Hey John, I would like to know your opinion on Kelvin Beachum. Do you think he played well enough for the Jags to pick up the option on his contract or do you think we will let him walk?

John: I do think Kelvin Beachum played well enough for the Jaguars to pick up his option, and I think that’s what the team will do. Beachum wasn’t perfect in 2016, and he said throughout the season he wasn’t satisfied with his play. But considering he was right at a year removed from a torn anterior cruciate ligament, he played at a remarkably high level. He pass-protected well for the most part with no oh-my-goodness games – the kind you fear from your left tackle. He didn’t run block as well as he pass blocked, but that should improve as his knee gets healthier this offseason.

Andre from Honeytown:

Khan’s last head-coaching decision came around January 17. Do you think this time it will be before, after, or right on the honey mark?

John: I imagine it will be before. That’s because the Jaguars got an earlier start in this process than in 2013. Remember the Jaguars hired David Caldwell as general manager before getting full-bore into the process to hire Gus Bradley. The timetable therefore could be moved up a few days. Depending on circumstance, it’s reasonable to think that could be the case.

Dennis from Macclenny, FL:

Why not give Marrone a one-year deal? This is not a rebuild and the reality of it is Blake Bortles will be the Jaguars’ quarterback next season. Marrone believes in Bortles, so let’s get on with it.

John: Doug Marrone is a legitimate head-coaching candidate who has been successful as an NFL head coach and who will be a head coach in the NFL again soon. Not only would offering him the job with a one-year deal be insulting, why in the world would he accept it if offered?

Michael from Middleburg, FL:

Hey, O: do we have a coach yet?

John: No, but there’s a guy in ticketing who can wiggle his ears. There’s also a girl in marketing who can make clockwise circles with her right foot and draw a six in the air with her right hand at the same time and we all think that’s just the most adorable thing.

Mike from Atlanta, GA:

I am out of the loop. Were Bortles’ shoulder separations in his throwing shoulder? If so, that could explain some of his accuracy issues. I hate excuse-makers, but sometimes it’s simply an explanation. Gravity isn’t an excuse for an apple falling from a tree, it is the reason it falls from the tree.

John: Bortles’ separations were in his throwing shoulder, but they happened in the second half of the season, so they don’t explain his early-season accuracy issues. They also don’t explain that Bortles improved in the final two games. Bortles when discussing the issues this past week said there probably times the separations affected him, but he in no way tried to say that the separations defined his season.

Marc from US Assure:

Does wanting to rush standing up indicate he wants to play a different position, or is it acceptable for a 4-3 defensive end to stand up to rush? I’m curious because in high school (don’t laugh), I rushed much better standing than with my hand in the dirt. The coaches pushed me to keep my hand down, but eventually relented as I was much more effective standing. I never played past high school so there is that.

John: I don’t get the idea Fowler cares what his position is called. I get the idea he wants to play in a way he thinks he can be more effective. He believes that’s standing up as a pass rusher – and who knows? Maybe it is. It’s difficult in a 4-3 defense for an end to stand up on all downs because of the run responsibility – and because if he’s standing up it’s sorta not a 4-3. Still, it’s way too early to know the Jaguars’ scheme next season, so we’ll see. Oh … and you know how you said (don’t laugh)? Well …

Keith from Palatka, FL:

First of all, I hope that Blake Bortles does improve and succeed. It would be foolish not to think that. Do you think that we need a Plan B (backup plan) just in case Bortles struggles again? What would be your idea of a Plan B?

John: I don’t doubt there will be a Plan B at quarterback for the Jaguars next season. That’s because while I think Bortles will start, I don’t think it’s necessarily a given. The tricky part of a “Plan B” at the quarterback position is determining what is meant by “Plan B.” Does that mean trading for a quarterback such as A.J. McCarron? Or does it mean signing a player such as Jay Cutler? Does it mean a player such as Ryan Fitzpatrick, Tyrod Taylor or Brian Hoyer? The overriding question about all such players is what would it take to sign them – and if it takes a lot to sign them, are they truly a Plan B? Are you going to pay a player front-line quarterback money – and even non-front-line quarterbacks are very, very expensive – to compete? Those are the questions the Jaguars must answer upon the hiring of a new head coach.

Pages: 12

O-Zone: Timing isn’t everything

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Bill from Hawthorn Woods, IL:

I believe it was about a week ago you thought the next head coach would likely come from the group of Tom Coughlin, Mike Smith or Doug Marrone … if my memory serves me right. After a week into the full process and all the prognostication going on, who are your Top Three most likely now?

John: Kyle Shanahan, Marrone, Smith in no particular order.

Brian from Atlanta, GA:

I keep hearing that the Doug Marrone interview went well. If he was seen as an in-house solution, it really seems like it was foolish for the team to hold on to Gus Bradley as long as it did. I just want to put my voice out there that I don’t want it to be Marrone. Is he going to fire his now two-time offensive coordinator in Nathaniel Hackett? Is he going to replace Todd Wash? If the same coaches are in place, how much of a change can we really expect? If we are supposed to expect a big change, with such little coaching change, how poor of a decision was it to hang on to Bradley that long? We need to bring in some new blood. I don’t think Marrone is a bad coach, but I really don’t think he’s the answer.

John: If Marrone is the permanent head coach, I would be surprised if Hackett doesn’t return as the offensive coordinator. Hackett was Marrone’s offensive coordinator in previous stops at Syracuse and with the Buffalo Bills, so it’s reasonable to think he would be the guy here. What would happen with Wash? That remains to be seen, though it wouldn’t be out of the question for him to return considering how the defense played this past season. How much would change? That would depend on Marrone’s direction. It could be argued, though, that the Jaguars don’t need a big change. This was a team that was close in a lot of games and perhaps it’s a tweak or two and a change in voice that’s needed more than an overhaul. We’ll see.

Gary from Wesley Chapel, FL:

Mr. O, not every good or even great offensive coordinator, defensive coordinator or position coach is a good or great “head” coach. The qualities that define a great head coach do not necessarily match all of the qualities of the others. Marrone appears to me to be someone who could be a great head coach. Not just because of the last two games, and the way he handled himself in that situation, but also some of the insight he provided into his coaching style, the way he presented himself, etc. There are other reasons as well, having more to do with stability and continuity for the team. Maybe it just comes down to more of a gut feeling- but to me, Marrone is the right choice for the job. What is your assessment of him as far as being head coach material, O great and wise…guy?

John: Marrone has six seasons of experience as a head coach – four at Syracuse and two with Buffalo in the NFL. It was evident during the two weeks he served as interim head coach that he was comfortable in the role, and it was evident players respected his approach and responded to it. I got the impression from being around Marrone that he is “head-coaching” material, that he can provide leadership and establish a structure and culture that can provide the framework for success. He can lead, make big-picture decisions and provide the environment. That’s what you need from a head coach, so there’s no reason he can’t do the job.

Jason from North Pole, AK:

I think people are forgetting that is 22 years old and has been in this league for about eight months. I will take his opinion on the defensive scheme with a grain of salt. I tend to find more value in the opinion of the men who have been coaching and playing this game for 30-plus years. I love the kid, but let’s not act like the players know best here. Thoughts?

John: I think everybody can have an opinion, and I think players such as Ramsey, and Fowler know their styles of play and how they are most comfortable playing. That may not always fit exactly into what all 11 players are required to do in a defense. I wouldn’t have minded the Jaguars being more aggressive in the secondary at times – and I’m sure as a first-year coordinator, there were things Todd Wash would tell you he could have done better this past season. But this defense improved dramatically this past season with massive changeover in personnel and without a great pass rush when rushing four down linemen. It just didn’t look like a defense in disarray throughout much of the season.

Jeremy from Bossier City, LA:

“Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing. If it doesn’t matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score? Winning is not a sometime thing…it’s an all the time thing. You don’t win once in a while … you don’t do the right thing once in a while…you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit.” – Vince Lombardi. Let’s not criticize Beachum for wanting to win and advocating that it should be the mentality of the coach. Beachum is a smart guy. Maybe we should listen to him.

John: No one around the Jaguars is or ever has been against winning, but yes, absolutely Beachum is a smart guy. It’s a good thing that he wants to win and that he wants a coach to want to win. And yes … when players talk they should be heard. Nothing wrong with that.

Brian from Section 238:

Touché, John – touché. I read all of the Jags stories. It’s what diehard fans do. Here’s my question: Since a winning team was a reasonable expectation last year, what’s this year’s expectation? Do we temper our hopes because of last season’s disappointment? I don’t see how that would be fair.

John: I think expectations entering next season should be pretty much what they were entering this past season – and I expected the Jaguars to push for a winning record last season. I think if a few things had gone differently they could have done that. The biggest issue remains /quarterback position. Can he make the strides in Year 4 many wanted/expected in Year 3? Can the Jaguars get more leads and more pressure on opposing quarterbacks? Can they reduce give-aways and get more take-aways defensively? If those three things happen, then this team can push for a lot of things.

Luke from Wautoma, WI:

I live in Packer Country. As the playoffs begin and the Packers take part in their eighth straight postseason, I sit here frustrated yet again; along with the rest of the fan base. The Jags finally had the talent and did absolutely nothing with it. Thinking back to how the season started … driving to beat Green Bay down four with under a minute left … it’s really disappointing. I remember how promising things seemed at the time. Bortles looked improved … had a touchdown catch…the defense kept Rodgers in check … A-Rob looked like a force at the end of the game … everything was looking up. I don’t have a question. It just bums me out as the local media here is hyped for Packers-Giants this weekend.

John: I almost didn’t reply to this one because of the “I-don’t-have-a-question” part, but then I thought about your email. And you’re right. The Jaguars’ 2016 season was a disappointment – because the vast majority of games played out strikingly like the Green Bay game. The Jaguars lost 13 games and 10 of them were decided in the fourth quarter. Two others – the San Diego and Oakland games – turned because of turnovers and mistakes, and then there was the one-sided prime-time debacle against Tennessee. Was it disappointing? Absolutely? Was it bad? Yes. But if there is something to provide hope it’s that this overall looked like a team that didn’t quit, that was close and appears young and ascending. I don’t know how the key questions of the offseason and the future will be answered – i.e., whether or not Bortles is the quarterback and if the Jaguars can get things right at the position – but it does seem there are a lot of pieces to the puzzle in place. Now, can the Jaguars get the right person in place at head coach and quarterback to make sure the pieces all work? That’s what’s next.

Scott from Daytona Beach, FL:

With many head coaching jobs available and now two teams basically gutting their defensive coaches, how important is to hire a new coach quickly to be able to get his assistants in place?

John: It’s important not to dawdle, but it’s not always necessary to rush. A head-coaching candidate typically has multiple assistants for each position, and more often than not, he is reasonably certain he will be able to get a person from that group. It is sometimes the case, for example, that a head-coaching candidate with an offensive background knows exactly who he will hire as a defensive coordinator – and in that case, timing of the hire is not nearly as important as otherwise is the case.

Pages: 12

O-Zone: Setting a precedent

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Brian from Section 238:

No one wants to read these “Poor ” stories. He can’t look anyone in the eye because it’s his fault he fumbles. It’s his fault he didn’t prepare enough in the offseason. isn’t throwing interceptions. Blake is. Way too many. Shoulder was hurt. Blah, blah, blah. Stop the excuses and win. It’s time to grow up. Sorry for being cold, but my goodness …

John: I’m the first to say Blake Bortles had a sub-par year. I said throughout the season his struggles were the Jaguars’ No. 1 storyline of 2016 and the No. 1 reason for the team finishing so far below .500. But I can’t get on board with people criticizing him for discussing his season this week. Bortles is candid and answers questions when asked. He never made excuses during the season – and when asked after the season, he outlined some issues that he believes were factors in his season. That was the appropriate time to discuss those topics. Bortles needs to play better. He knows this. He said any number of times throughout the season that what was going on with the Jaguars, the offense and certainly himself was on him. He’s the quarterback. It’s his responsibility. There were reasons he didn’t play well. There’s nothing wrong with him talking about the issues. And as far as people not wanting to read the Poor Blake Bortles stories … I don’t know … I bet people read them.

Daniel from Urbandale, IA:

Of the coaching candidates mentioned, the only one I really dislike is Josh McDaniels. Not because of Tim Tebow – everyone makes mistakes – but because he’s only considered because of Tom Brady. Every coordinator Brady has ever had looks good. That success doesn’t translate anywhere else that Tom Brady isn’t playing.

John: That indeed is the reason to be cautious when considering McDaniels. He knows this. Everyone in the NFL knows this. But just as McDaniels shouldn’t get a job simply because of Brady and his association with the New England Patriots, neither should he be ignored simply because of Brady and his association with the Patriots, either. He is considered a very capable, bright young head coach and many, many people believe he will be successful at his next stop.

Ed from Ponte Vedra, FL:

I reflect on the last few years and the player I feel the worst about is Paul Poz. He came in as a free agent and gave the Jags a superstar performance. Too bad he was playing for a very mediocre team. Do you think he will be back?

John: I do. While much will depend on the scheme and the opinion of the next head coach, one of the errors made by the Jaguars in 2013 was not having enough experienced, core players on the roster. The rebuild cut too close to the bone. Releasing Posluszny would smell very similar.

Jaginator from Section 124:

“Players and coaches don’t think that way – not even during meaningless games.” Please stahp. Players don’t tank. But coaches have done this before. In the 2014 season finale, the Bucs led New Orleans 20-7. After halftime, Lovie Smith began yanking the starters. Final score: NO 23, TB 20. And the Bucs secured the No. 1 overall draft position. If they’d kept their starters in (and won that game), they wouldn’t have gotten Winston or Mariota.

John: Point taken. That’s not what happened Sunday.

Greg from Section 122 and Jacksonville:

It is amusing that people think we would blow a game just for draft position. I mean cause we blew a LOT of leads this year late in the season.

John: Indeed, if the Jaguars’ poor fourth quarters this past season were about draft position … well, they got a very early start and pretty much mastered their craft.

Tim from Jacksonville:

If the Jaguars still aren’t sure that 11-34 is a losing record, then next year will be more of the same. Caldwell’s support of Bortles is the most worrisome aspect of the offseason so far. Let me just say that as long as Bortles has no true competition, I won’t be renewing for my 11th consecutive season of watching losers fail at football. It’s not his throwing motion insomuch as it is the organization’s dogged refusal to cut ties with losers. We don’t need a “good guy” in the huddle. We need someone who can play quarterback and win, no matter what their personality, race, school or background. The only question that matters is, “Does Bortles win?”

John: OK.

Keith from Palatka, FL:

At the risk of Tony Boselli becoming even more egotistical, which some believe is an impossibility, I have to say he is the best left tackle that I ever saw play. John, you’ve watched a lot of football; have you ever seen any left tackle better than Boselli?

John: I never covered a left tackle on a weekly basis better than Tony Boselli. The only left tackles I believe may have been better were Anthony Munoz and Walter Jones.

Dylan from Stillwater, OK:

If it came down to re-signing or , who would be more important to the team?

John: Smith. He is a core player.

Terry from Jacksonville:

I do not know why you cannot tell what has been really going on in the locker room this year since most of the coaches will be gone. We all read your comments every day and you never tell it like it is; you are still defending Gus Bradley and coaches instead of listening to the players. Maybe they know better.

John: The players have done a pretty good job in recent days of sharing their thoughts, and that’s great: it indeed has provided a lot of insight into their feelings about what went wrong with the Jaguars this past season. Perhaps those feelings are right, and perhaps they’re not. Most likely there is some truth in what the players say and it’s also likely that the disappointment and frustration of a 3-13 season shapes their comments as well. That’s human nature. As far my every-day comments … I learned long ago that telling it like it is and telling it like readers want me to tell it are often not the same thing. I prefer to do my best to do the former. That doesn’t mean people like what I write or agree with it, but that’s going to happen no matter what I write.

Daniel from Jacksonville:

As burned out as I am on Bortles talk, I would be interested to hear your assessment on this. There are classic sayings about rookie struggles and sophomore slumps, but it would seem to me that difficulties in a third season are not so easily explained by cliches and are much more concerning about a player’s true ability. I guess what I’m getting at is this: can you name a quarterback in NFL history that has had the kind of glaring regression Bortles has had in his third season and still gone on to be a franchise quarterback? Is there any NFL precedent for that kind of transformation at this point in a quarterback’s career? If not, then I think we have our answer about needing to move on. Either that or the Jaguars are hoping that he will do something unprecedented in the history of the NFL, and that kind of hope doesn’t seem like a reasonable strategy for winning.

John: I don’t care all that much about precedent because what other quarterbacks have done doesn’t necessarily apply to Bortles. But there absolutely have been quarterbacks who have struggled early in their careers and gone on to success: Drew Brees, Eli Manning and Alex Smith come to mind. Were their struggles as pronounced as Bortles? It depends on how you judge struggles. Bortles lost more games than those three, but those players and others have had trouble with interceptions and efficiency early in their careers before being successful later. One topic I keep considering, though, is the idea of Bortles regressing. I suppose he did to some degree, but I guess I’m not as much a believer in the idea as might be the case. He had some accuracy issues during a stretch of this season – but beyond the 50-50 ball to not working as effectively this season as last, he was much the same quarterback both seasons. Bortles threw for about 500 yards less this past season than in 2015 and Robinson had about 500 yards less receiving; Robinson’s long reception was 90 yards in 2015 and it was 42 this past season. The difference in Bortles and the offense from 2015 was pretty much that defenses took the deep ball to Robinson away and the Jaguars didn’t have an answer. Bortles overall has struggled with mid-range accuracy, interceptions, pocket awareness and decision-making throughout his career – even in 2015. The question: Can Bortles improve? It’s possible. He has a base. He has been effective at times. But it’s time. It has to happen now.

Pages: 12

O-Zone: To the max

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Brian from Gainesville, FL:

Big O, is it wildly and completely out of the question to think that the coaching strategy in the second half of the Colts game was to ensure a loss for draft position? This must happen even if it’s never talked about, right? I mean the team played well in the first half. In the second half, especially the last drive, the play-calling was terrible. It seems like taking a dive is not all that hard to believe.

John: I understand why people would think this. I understand because people love conspiracy theories and people love to assume untoward things occur. Is it wildly and completely out of the question to “think” the Jaguars were playing for draft position in the second half Sunday? People can “think” whatever they please. Were the Jaguars in fact trying to lose Sunday to play for draft positioning? No, they were not. Players and coaches don’t think that way – not even during meaningless games. They just don’t.

Dave from Duval:

Wow. Apparently the players think it was coaching, too.

John: Some do. Many don’t. Maybe the ones who think it are right. Maybe the ones who don’t are right. That’s what’s awesome about opinions. Everyone can have one.

Austin from Madison, WI:

John, I just wanted to applaud your response to Paul’s comment about ‘s rant regarding the use of the term winning. I understand what Kelvin means and understand some players prefer different styles in their head coach, but to act like that was the reason the Jaguars didn’t win is pretty laughable. It has worked pretty well for Seattle and Pete Carroll, hasn’t it? Seems to me like some of the players on the Jaguars need to keep their mouth shut and worry about doing their job well before criticizing others. Not a very good look, Kelvin, in my opinion.

John: I like Kelvin Beachum and have no problem with him speaking his mind – or with other Jaguars players speaking their minds. Players are entitled to their opinions, and it makes following a team and following sports far more interesting when they do. I, too, understand what he was saying – just as I understand players such as , and may have preferred to be used differently this past season. All’s well and good. But to think the Jaguars lost this season because the word “winning” wasn’t used enough stretches logic a bit. Was the defensive scheme to blame? Could players have been used differently? I wouldn’t mind the secondary playing a bit more aggressive. I see the point in that, but this defense wasn’t awful and it improved a lot this season – and the defense played at a winning level a pretty good percentage of the time. But I wouldn’t paint this as a defense that was woefully mismanaged or that completely misused its talent. I think that’s going far too far the other way, and I think the play on the field showed that.

George from Jacksonville:

So Zone, professional athletes who have almost all come from very successful high school and college careers need to be told that winning is better than losing, daily? It appears that is what many readers think? If Gus ended every day saying, “Oh by the way boys, the 12 hours you spent here today and the two-and-a-half-hour practice in 100 degree heat, and all the lifting and meetings is so we can win” I guess it would have changed everything!

John: I suppose.

Brian from Gainesville, FL:

Big O, as someone who has had the opportunity to watch the Gators up close, I’d say Dante Fowler is right that he would be much more effective playing standing up instead of with his hand in the dirt. What say you?

John: I’d say this will be among the Jaguars’ more intriguing postseason topics. Will the next defensive coordinator – be it Todd Wash or a new guy – employ a scheme with Fowler standing up more? Perhaps. It’s worth a look. Will he blossom into the player worthy of the No. 3 overall selection? Perhaps. As important is whether he continues to develop pass-rushing moves and gain experience. That will matter – wherever he places his hand before he plays again.

Jeff from Jacksonville:

I think it’s about time for Canton to get a little bit of teal added to it. Tony in 2017!!!

John: Yep.

Daniel from Bold City:

Which of our free agents do you think we will re-sign? I like the improvement showed this year, and was playing great. I hope David Caldwell brings them back next season.

John: These decisions will all depend greatly on input from the new coaching staff. Cyprien’s return could depend on what he believes he can get on the open market, whereas left tackle may return on a one-year prove-it-type deal because of the nature of his knee injury. I think pursuing Jones will be a priority. He earned some form of second contract, and worked his way into a key role.

Jason from North Pole, AK:

A.J. McCarron, Tony Romo, Jimmy Garoppolo, Colin Kaepernick and Mike Glennon are all guys that will be either free agents or trade bait. Do you think of any of them make sense to be brought in as competition? Or are we more likely to have a new quarterback brought in through the draft? Or is the competition we speak of? What does all this mean for ?

John: I don’t see Henne returning next season. He is expensive for a backup, and the idea of drafting Allen was that he would be ready for the backup role – at minimum – in his second season. I also don’t see Romo in Jacksonville, because I think whether he is traded or released, he will have some input into his destination – and a 3-13 team will be a hard sell for a quarterback of his age. As far as the others, I don’t mind the idea of McCarron, Glennon or Garoppolo in some capacity. The question becomes: at what cost? It’s very possible all will command fairly significant compensation in terms of draft selections or free-agent salary/signing bonus. Do you pay what amounts to premium equity for a quarterback for competition, or is that sort of purchase reserved for a player who is coming in as The Guy? We won’t know those answers until we have a better idea of the direction of the franchise, and we won’t have an idea about the direction of the franchise until there’s a new head coach.

Jerell from Columbia, SC:

Love Bortles’ excuse for why he was awful this year?

John: Now, now … I understand many people don’t want as the Jaguars’ quarterback next season. I also wonder if he can be a franchise quarterback. But let’s not paint this week as Bortles making excuses. He has been asked about some issues that went on during the season and last offseason, and he has answered honestly. He said offensive coordinator Greg Olson encouraged him to work with his receivers here in Jacksonville as opposed to working with quarterback gurus Tom House and Adam Dedeaux last offseason and he said he played through a shoulder separation late in the season. He didn’t cry or complain about either of those things, and he didn’t discuss them as if they were the sole reasons he struggled last season. Bortles may not be developed as a quarterback yet, and it remains to be seen if that will ever happen. But I’ve never gotten the idea he was a complainer or an excuse-maker.

Aaron from Chantilly:

Bortles’ career win/loss record is 11-34. … I just don’t see why we need to bring him back, other than he has one year remaining on his contract. Everyone points to Gus’ win/loss record, which is roughly the same – yet we see improvement on the defensive side and not in the quarterback play. Head scratcher …

John: Don’t scratch too hard. You could break skin and leave a scar. But the reasons you bring Bortles back are simple – that he has a year remaining on his contract, that he has shown enough in three years to give you hope that he could be good and that good quarterbacks are hard to find. You have one you think might be good on the roster. You don’t make him go away until you’re sure he’s not – and perception to the contrary, the Jaguars are not yet sure he’s not.

Chris from Jacksonville:

So, with the front-office interest in Josh McDaniel as our new head coach, it turns into us getting Tebow – the guy his mentor, not to mention every other team, has not seen fit to bring in with the quarterback injuries this year? Isn’t he playing baseball or something? Please, John: make these crazy people stop. I know the offseason is a time for speculation with all that has happened over the past three weeks, but all I know is I picked the wrong day to quit sniffing glue.

John: #tebowtime!!!!

Troy from Dover, PA:

Has Tony Boselli’s head got any bigger in the last couple days?

John: No. He’s already maxed out.

Pages: 12

O-Zone: Just win, baby

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Bill from Hawthorn Woods, IL:

I know all the focus is on the head coach. Clearly that is a critical decision. I am curious about your thoughts on the offensive coordinator, though. has had three in three years as the starting quarterback. That can’t help his development. What do you think helps the offense improve faster? A) Provide some stability by keeping Nathaniel Hackett and the current system while focusing on roster improvement and discipline, or B) hire someone like Mike McCoy, who has a great offensive mind with hopes of providing a jolt to Blake’s development? Bonus question … how much does a head coach candidates’ view on this issue weigh on Shad and Dave in selection process?

John: The Offensive Coordinator/Young Quarterback indeed is one of the great NFL conundrums, and yes – I like writing and saying “conundrum.” It’s fun, especially if you extend the final “m:” condundrummmmmmmmm. As far as this particular conundrum goes, it’s one that often tends to feed on itself, gaining momentum and clouding the ability to assess the quarterback. It goes like this: a young quarterback struggles because he is a young quarterback, and because he struggles his team loses. Because his team loses, the offensive coordinator is fired. Because the offensive coordinator is fired, one of the key elements needed for a quarterback’s success – continuity – is impossible. Is it the chicken or the egg? My guess is if Hackett were to remain as the Jaguars’ coordinator, he would not run the exact system as Greg Olson ran this season, so the reality is whatever offense Bortles runs next season, it will be relatively new. For that reason, the best thing that can happen is for the next Jaguars head coach to hire the best offensive coordinator he can find and let Bortles dive head first into his next coordinator. It ain’t ideal, but when you lose as much as the Jaguars have lost in recent seasons, you don’t get ideal.

Billy from Orange Park, FL:

According to the “talking heads,” the interview with Tom Coughlin failed to reach a “common ground.” Any insight to what was discussed and why he’s not a good fit?

John: I haven’t heard for certain that Shad Khan believes Coughlin isn’t a good fit. I’ve heard people speculating and reporting that it’s not a good fit, and that there’s no common ground – and that’s not the same thing.

Brandon from Duval:

John, the report about Bortles being hurt most of the year kind of put things in perspective for me and explains the regression for the most part. Not having confidence in your arm can cause one to overthink more. Do you think that was his main issue and he can come back better and healthier next year?

John: I’m not on board with the idea that the injury was a real big factor for Bortles this season, and I don’t get the idea he considered it a huge issue, either. He did a good job playing through it, and I actually thought for the most part he played better at times after the injury than before. While Bortles’ accuracy issues were a problem for a good part of the season, as big an area of focus moving forward must be decision-making and pocket awareness. Those areas at times have been as or more concerning.

DUVAL DOOM from Section 217:

What a stupidly disappointing year. What a terrible way to have something you look forward to so badly, end. I am so frustrated. Maybe I’ll be back to talking smack and never-ending optimism on Twitter before I know it, but I don’t know. This feels like more of a soul crusher. One damn win at home – one – in a season everything was supposed to come together. Awesome.

John: The 2016 season sucked. That’s not the cleanest way to say it, but that’s the truth. It was supposed to be a season in which the Jaguars pushed for .500 – and at the very least, it wasn’t supposed to be one in which the team challenged for its worst record in franchise history. Considering that season followed a whole bunch of other seasons that have … well … sucked, it’s unsurprising that your fan self would feel crushed. It’s unsurprising your fan self would feel frustrated. It’s logical you would feel that way for a while. I got a sense a lot of players felt that way, too, which helped explain a lot of the comments read and heard this week as last year’s coaching staff made its way out of the building. Losing isn’t fun. People don’t like it. When you lose as often as the Jaguars did this season, it takes a while for the effects to ease and for enthusiasm to return. It just does.

Daniel from Duval:

Before the draft, lots of people were saying that would only have five good years before his knee wears out. Is there any news on Myles Jack’s knee wearing out? Or does it seem he can have a long NFL career?

John: People commenting on Jack’s knee leading to the draft were speculating, and the bottom line on Jack’s knee is it’s an issue that could eventually require serious surgery – and it’s also an issue that eventually could be career-altering or career-ending. It also is an issue that might not be career-altering or career-ending. I don’t anticipate “news” on this issue because there won’t be regular updates on the matter. Jack essentially will be in a position where he will be able to play until his body no longer allows him to do so – which makes him a lot like a lot of other NFL players.

Jerell from Columbia, SC:

The Jags will be foolish to handcuff themselves to Blake Bortles next year. Trade, draft, sign, another viable quarterback or we will be having this same conversation next year. The guy isn’t any good: look at the record, stats, the fact that he has gotten three offensive coordinators fired and one head coach. Any coach taking this job would be crazy to hitch their wagon to Bortles and they shouldn’t have to. That’s why in my opinion I wanted Dave gone as well because I feel he is going to strongly encourage the coach to give Blake a shot when he doesn’t deserve it.

John: I don’t see the Jaguars as being tied to Blake Bortles. I think that topic is going to be Issue No. 1 when Shad Khan, David Caldwell and others meet with head-coaching candidates, and although Caldwell believes in Bortles I don’t get the idea his opinion on the matter will be anything close to the final word. But there’s little question that Bortles will be in the competition. He probably will be competing for the opportunity. The questions are, “Can he win that competition?” and “How difficult will that competition be?”

Paula from Brunswick, GA:

I’m rooting for the Josh McDaniels hire – him bringing in his guy, the quarterback he drafted in the first round and reading your back-peddling on your assessment of Tim. There’s really nothing else to root for around this franchise anyway.

John: Why would I back pedal on my assessment? I don’t think Tim Tebow is a good NFL quarterback; he hasn’t made an NFL roster in a very long time, so apparently most around the NFL agree. If McDaniels is hired and brings in Tebow and Tebow proves to be an NFL-quality quarterback, then I would be … wait for it … wrong about Tebow! Worse things have happened in my life. Shoot, worse things will probably happen this afternoon. Good for Tebow if it happens. It would make a heck of a story. I’m sure crazier things have happened. It’s a short list.

Paul from Temecula, CA:

I guess ‘s comments answer my question about why Gus Bradley as a coach didn’t translate to a winning team on the field (although the losing can’t ever be attributed to one person/thing).

John: Gus Bradley didn’t win enough games. No one would dispute that. And if Beachum and other players believe talking about winning would have produced more winning, then perhaps the word “winning” will be said more next year – and perhaps the victories will come in bunches because of it. Let’s hope so. Jaguars fans deserve that. Interim head coach Doug Marrone talked about winning and the Jaguars beat the Tennessee Titans. He talked about winning the following week and the Jaguars blew a 17-point first-half lead and looked a lot like the team that couldn’t close games for seven consecutive weeks under Bradley. I think Marrone is a good coach who will do a good job wherever he is a head coach, but I don’t know that the number of times he says winning is going to be the reason that he does a good job. I imagine I’ll remain in the minority on this, and that’s OK because I imagine it will become a fading issue pretty soon: But while Bradley not talking about winning has become a hot topic among players and fans – and while that has become the reason de jour for the Jaguars’ struggles in recent years – I’m just not on board with the idea that players don’t grasp the notion that winning is the key in the National Football League. It’s a cool thing to talk about, and it’s an easy thing to criticize. It just doesn’t feel all that substantive. But again, I’ve been wrong before. Paula can tell you that.

Pages: 12

O-Zone: The kit and kaboodle

John Oehser Senior writer jaguars.com Follow John on twitter Like The O-Zone on facebook

JACKSONVILLE — As days go, Monday was a weird one.

That’s not surprising, because Monday around the Jaguars was getaway day – the day after the last game day of the regular season.

Getaway day is always odd. You never get used to its finality. One day/moment, you’re around a team preparing for and playing a game; the next moment, the locker room is empty and you’re looking at two or three months of eerie quiet until the offseason program begins.

That’s after an ordinary season; getaway day in a time of transition is even odder.

This is very definitely that sort of time for the Jaguars.

The search is on for a permanent head coach to replace Gus Bradley, who was dismissed a little more than two weeks ago. Interim Head Coach Doug Marrone will be a legitimate candidate, and former Jaguars Head Coach Tom Coughlin reportedly interviewed last week. Still, there’s no sign either Coughlin or Marrone necessarily is a front-runner.

The locker room Monday reflected that uncertainty, with players talking about not following the rumors in the coming weeks. Many will have one eye on Twitter, of course, and already there are reports of other potential candidates.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers defensive coordinator Mike Smith, New England Patriots offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels, Arizona Cardinals offensive coordinator Harold Goodwin, Atlanta Falcons offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan and New England Patriots defensive coordinator Matt Patricia …

All will fill Jaguars Twitter and will be the subject of reports in the coming days.

Monday’s locker room also was filled with players discussing what went wrong in 2016. As would be expected after a 3-13 season that began with high expectations, the theories were many. Cornerback Jalen Ramsey and safety Tashaun Gipson talked after Sunday’s game of not being used ideally this season, and defensive end Dante Fowler Jr. told the media Monday he considers himself more a standup defensive end than the hand-on-the-ground version he played this season.

What does it all mean? Probably this:

That this is a team that failed by a wide margin to meet expectations; when that happens, complaints get aired. When expectations aren’t met, fingers get pointed and directions get lost; head coaches get fired, and seasons end with a chaotic feel.

Is it messy? Yes.

Does it create interesting storylines? Without question.

Is it a tragedy? A sign that all hope for the future is lost? No. There will be a new head coach soon – and that could mean a new staff. It certainly will mean a new direction, a new voice. Players will leave for the offseason, hit refresh and return refocused and perhaps a bit more seasoned and professional – older, wise and having gained from the experience.

What will we do? Well, we’ll do what we do every day in the O-Zone. We’ll move on, talk it out and be glad to be talking football. So, on to the offseason. #DTWD

Let’s get to it …

Logan from Wichita, KS:

It is clear to me the locker room is broken. The defense hates the offense and now the defense is mad at the coaches and each other, so we are in a massive mess. Half the team doesn’t want to be here and 100 percent of them have no confidence we can win games. This offseason brings no hope.

John: The defense doesn’t hate the offense and these players absolutely have confidence they will win. Players need to get away. Whoever’s coaching the team needs to get into the building and set a course. It’s time for a reset. That’s what the offseason will be about. There’s nothing broken around the Jaguars that won’t solve.

Daniel Since Day One:

I agree with picking the best available player, but I’m not sure another great weak-side linebacker or wide receiver stuck on the bench most of the time would help. Walters deserves far more playing time and his routes and hands are what settled down. Best possession receiver we have had since Keenan McCardell – and maybe better! But he rarely gets to play. If nothing else, I hope these last two games put an end to that.

John: I wouldn’t want to see the Jaguars draft a weak-side linebacker, but that won’t happen at No. 4 overall. I can’t think of a No. 4-worthy position where the Jaguars couldn’t use a great player: quarterback, defensive end, wide receiver, left tackle, defensive tackle, cornerback … Check, check, check, check, check, check. That’s not to say the Jaguars can’t win with the players they have there. But if there’s a Jalen Ramsey-level talent at those spots, could such player help the Jaguars? Yes. The strongest argument against would be cornerback, because two lock-down corners might be overkill. At the same time, there are worse problems … wait? Did you say Brian Walters is better than Keenan McCardell?

DUVAL DOOM from Section 217:

I get frustrated by this team. I let that frustration out and am often told I am wrong about whatever I’m frustrated about. This past week I was frustrated with the kicker. Two years in a row we’ve had an opportunity to beat the Colts in their house, and two years in a row has missed multiple field goals to help do so. I typically approach the Jaguars from an emotional place, so I don’t care about stats enough to bother looking at them. I was told Myers makes 85 percent of his kicks, and that is good. So why do I get SO nervous every time he kicks? Why does the entire stadium cross their fingers? I don’t remember feeling that way with Scobee. (I’m not advocating the return of Scobee, to be clear) Just extremely frustrating to me.

John: I thought Myers did quite a bit to inspire confidence this season – and up until the last two games, he was very good. He actually missed just two field goals under 50 yards this season. But in the last two weeks he missed two extra points and a 30-yard field goal. That’s not confidence-inspiring.

Bruce from Owensboro, KY:

I know it’s awful early for this question, but what do you think about going after Romo? He would need a better offensive line but other than that – and maybe a running back – I think if you bring him in you are .500 or better right away. You could sit Bortles and get the fan base excited. What say you, Big O?

John: I doubt the Jaguars go that route. A major reason I doubt it is I expect Romo to be released or traded by the Cowboys. If he is released, I doubt a 3-13 team would appeal to him considering his age and considering there likely would be teams perceived as being in better position to win quickly. If he is traded, I expect the Cowboys to allow him some sort of input into his destination. If that’s the case, the whole “3-13-team” thing would come into play again.

Hika from Jacksonville:

This team will never know how to win. We will be stuck as a six-win team max per year forever!

John: Nah.

Christopher from St. Augustine, FL:

Mr. Oehser, Gus Bradley had to be let go due to his performance this year. I do think it’s unfair to simply judge him on his overall record as a head coach because for the first few years he was given a gutted roster and asked to make them competitive. That’s a big ask. But I think he’s the head coach the Jaguars needed for those first few years because his constant positivity probably helped players stay energized throughout a rough rebuild. Now I think the Jaguars need to bring in a coach with a history of winning that can establish that mentality for a team that has been through some really lean years. Your thoughts?

John: My thoughts are I’m about ready to cease rehashing the Gus Bradley Issue, but I think there’s a lot to this theory. People can discuss his record all they want, and I can write about how it’s always coaching in the NFL all I want, but Bradley’s culture did establish a “constant positivity.” That constant positivity eventually gave way this season to a nine-game losing streak, and somewhere in there it became obvious something needed to change. Once that happened, and once the season ended Sunday, you were left with a 3-13 team – and with players who were ready to voice some things. I imagine the next coach will have a sterner feel. I imagine he will say the word “winning” more than Bradley said it. I imagine his approach will be different. I imagine players will buy in and say positive things about this new head coach because that is what players do when there is a new head coach and a new direction. I imagine the mentality of the team will take on the mentality of the new head coach. And I imagine if the Jaguars get quality quarterbacking and pressure from the defensive front in key situations then they will win more – and if that happens, then the head coach’s mentality will have a chance to take hold and the whole kit and kaboodle will be successful. Let’s hope that happens. Winning’s cool. People like it. And there hasn’t been nearly enough of it around here lately.

Pages: 12