JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …
Where Jags Fans Aren't Pussies
JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …
JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …
JACKSONVILLE – Merry Christmas to all.
Let’s get to it …
JACKSONVILLE – Game-day, Christmas Eve O-Zone.
Let’s get to it …
If I were interim head coach, and a candidate to return in 2017, I’d want to test out all my offensive weapons in these next two games before I applied – so I’d know more about what I was getting into. But that’s me.
John: In the case of Doug Marrone with the Jaguars – as is the case with most NFL interim head coaches – he had been on the coaching staff an extensive period of time before ascending to interim head coach. Marrone has coached the offensive line, so he has a pretty good idea the talent on the roster at that spot. He has a relatively good idea the talent at other positions, too. Could he play third-team quarterback Brandon Allen in the final two games? I suppose – and if he did, he automatically would become a phenomenally popular guy among a big portion of the fan base. But I don’t see it happening because Marrone and Jaguars General Manager David Caldwell appear to believe Blake Bortles is still the team’s best option to win. As far as other spots on either offense or defense, I can think of few spots outside perhaps Myles Jack at Otto linebacker where I think there are players potentially being under-used. Still, the conversation is in a very real sense moot. I wouldn’t say there’s no chance of Marrone being the head coach next season, but it’s obviously pretty slim – and I don’t think he’s coaching the next two games with the idea of looking ahead to next season.
Mighty ‘O,’ Happy Christmas from this side of The Pond. One ‘fer Krimma?!
John: One fer Krimma.
Two things, John: 1. After consistently saying he wouldn’t fire Gus Bradley during the season, what changed Shad Khan’s mind? The Houston loss didn’t seem worse than that Titans loss. Second, any chance we could see Marty Schottenheimer on the coaching candidate list? I get the playoff knock but the man always seems to build competitive teams.
John: The timing of Bradley’s departure isn’t really the mystery people seem to believe. Khan and General Manager David Caldwell met in Dallas at the NFL Owners Meetings last week and made the final determination that Bradley indeed would need to be dismissed. It had seemed obvious to everyone that dismissing Bradley was likely and even inevitable, but that was when the final decision was made. At that point, with both wanting to start the process of searching for a head coach, it was decided to make the move as soon as possible. Because it was already so late in the week, it was decided to wait until after the Houston game. The timing of the decision had nothing to do with the Texans loss – and the decision actually had been made to do it whether or not the Jaguars won or lost in Houston. That was really what went into the decision; it wasn’t more complicated than that. Could it have been handled better? I suppose, but there aren’t many really good ways to part ways with a head coach – particularly one everyone admired as much as Bradley. As far as Schottenheimer, I was a big fan of his when he coached and never thought he got the credit he deserved as a front-line, all-time head coach. But I don’t see him becoming a head coach again. It would appear that time has passed.
I’m confident every player on this team felt responsible for the letdown that ended in Gus’s release as they shook his hand on the plane last Sunday. Let’s hope something positive will be gained as a team. Tighten up
John: #Tightenup
Hey O, can you ask Bill from Danville to share that crystal ball he uses to verify that Jack wouldn’t play better than the two veterans in front of him?
John: Bill may not have a crystal ball, but Paul Posluszny and Telvin Smith have played well enough this season the he probably doesn’t need one. I’m all for seeing Myles Jack on the field more, but at the expense of Posluszny or Smith? Nah.
In his exit interview, Gus revealed something that makes it clear to me (and I imagine many others) why he wasn’t successful as a head coach and excelled as a defensive coordinator. He explained that once a player is given to him, he will work as hard as he can to help that player be the best he can be until the player is taken away from him by someone else. With Seattle, he had a head coach to give and take players from him. No one was going to make those decisions for him with the Jaguars, and he admitted that he needs someone in that role or he will constantly stick with the guys he has (i.e. Bortles). Am I just rambling here or do you think there is any truth to this thought?
John: I would say there’s probably some truth to it. Bradley certainly seemed to think so. There were many, many reasons the Jaguars struggled over the past four seasons, and I can’t say this was near the top of the list. But is it a way Bradley could have done better? Sure.
HAHAHA … I will believe your “guarantees” when I see it. Till then I highly doubt your “guarantees” because a 2-12 record, 44 yards of offense last week and a 36-22 beat down from the Titans last time that was more like 36-0 says you are delusional. Better put down the spiked egg nog for a bit there, O.
John: My guarantee that the Jaguars won’t lose Sunday has nothing to do with the 2-12 record, the 44 yards offense last week (150 yards, actually) and/or the beat down in October. I won’t be drinking any egg nog until Sunday because, either. I might drink it Saturday after the game, though.
At this point, the comment “the coaches think” has no credibility. The current coaches will be gone, so I don’t get why we should agree to the concept that Jack should not play more. Bad coaching decisions are the reason they are out. So the one regarding Jack, in theory, could be a wrong one.
John: No one’s asking you to agree to anything. It’s very much OK if you don’t.
I know quite a few people have brought up Myles Jack and the reasons they believe he should or should not be playing. I understand those points. However, it seems everybody is only looking at this in a very in-the-box fashion – i.e., “We have three linebacker spots, which one does he play?” They should be asking “Is Myles Jack one of our 11 best defensive players?” If the answer is yes, get him on the field, no excuses. I don’t care if that means somebody making a move to safety, get him on the field. Last I checked our defense is ranked 24th against the run so any excuse involving Dan Skuta as a run defender is a hollow one. Also, is your house on fire, Clark? Merry Christmas, O!
John: It’s very easy to say “move someone to safety,” but the reality is you’re not going to move Paul Posluszny to safety, so that leaves Smith or Jack. Smith has played linebacker since entering the NFL and has played it at a high level, so you don’t want to move him. That leaves Jack, which would mean moving a linebacker to a new position in his first NFL season. That sounds easy and it might work in Madden. Perhaps it’s not as easy in real life. As far as Skuta is concerned, I find the notion that the coaches feel they need to make an “excuse” to play him curious. Why would they force Skuta on the field over a highly-touted draft selection if they didn’t think he was the best player to play? What possible incentive would they have to do that? Also, don’t overemphasize rushing yards allowed per game as a way of measuring the Jaguars’ run defense. A better gauge might be yards per run allowed. The Jaguars rank seventh in that area at 3.8 yards per attempt. And by the way, Kyle: Those little lights? They’re not twinkling.
“I will go a step further and guarantee they will not beat the Jaguars Sunday.” Very sneaky, O. Everyone knows that it’s always the Jaguars who beat the Jaguars.
John: My guarantee that the Jaguars will not lose Sunday has nothing to do with the Jaguars propensity for beating themselves on Sundays.
To the surprise of sports fans everywhere, the definition of insanity is not doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results. In fact, practicing something is often the act of doing the same thing over and over again, expecting to improve at the task. Look it up! Am I right?
JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …
JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …
JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …
While I agree it’s the players’ jobs to execute the plays, I do think coaching has much more of an influence than is being given credit. The coaches decide which players are on the field, so – for example – when you have an ‘otherworldly’ talent in Myles Jack on the bench because Dan Skuta is five pounds heavier … that’s a coaching decision. When we get a first-half lead and try to squat on it, that is a coaching decision. I think it’s disheartening for the players to hear all week that our goal is to be aggressive and compete, which is great, but then on Sunday we changed our tune and were calling very conservative games.
John: Coaching indeed has an influence, and there’s no question it’s the coaches’ decision to play Dan Skuta at Otto linebacker in run situations. I’m not a huge fan of that because it’s probably time to see the rookie full-time. Still, considering the Jaguars’ defense has played at a pretty high level it’s hard to argue vehemently against the decision. The approach being taken offensively is trickier. I absolutely think that at some point you have to let Blake Bortles and this offense try to make plays downfield. He can’t be a big-time NFL quarterback with such an obvious emphasis on the screen pass and back-shoulder throws. At the same time, you’re talking about a quarterback who has struggled with interceptions fairly significantly. It’s not hard to see why coaches would scheme to avoid that.
3-13?
John: Sure, why not?
John: “It’s not easy to find a franchise quarterback, and you don’t want to give up on one until you’re sure he’s not one.” Please stop. The only time the words “franchise” and “Bortles” should be in the same sentence is if he buys a McDonald’s franchise with the money the Jags have needlessly paid him.
John: I didn’t write that I believe Bortles is destined to be a franchise quarterback. The results of his first three seasons don’t suggest that. But there is a limited pool of potential franchise quarterbacks, and the vast majority of those players are the property of other teams. Bortles has some attributes that still give him a chance to be a franchise quarterback – and he did some things in 2015 that also made it appear he could be that. The reason you continue to start him through this season is there is still a belief in the building that could happen. At some point very soon there will be conversations with head-coaching candidates on the matter – and the person who is selected will have input into Bortles’ role and future with the Jaguars. That’s when the Jaguars’ approach with Bortles could change. But I don’t see it changing in the next two weeks.
John, stop the love affair with Gus. When you lose as much as he did, then who really cares how nice you are or that he is a “good man?” For the last two days all you posted are the “We will miss you, good man Gus – even though you consistently lost game after game.” Time to move on from losing Gus as Shad should’ve done weeks ago. My question is, “What is the tone in the locker room now?” I think that since now the dead weight of Gus is finally off their backs, that the team will come out and play inspired football.
John: Thank you for the input, Chris. I’ll go ahead and keep answering questions in the O-Zone to the best of my ability, and I’ll keep appreciating and incorporating your input when appropriate. I’ll also laud someone for being a good man pretty much when I see fit – though I can check with you on that front if necessary. As far as the tone in the locker room, let’s just say the Jaguars’ players didn’t consider Bradley dead weight – and whatever their issues have been this season, inspiration or effort hasn’t been among them.
John, I’m looking at the latest stats. Out of the Top 6 sacks leaders in the NFL, five are linebackers. With our players, wouldn’t a 3-4 defense make sense? Malik and Yannick at end and Roy/Sen’Derrick at nose tackle. OLBs Telvin, Dante. ILBs Poz and Myles. Didn’t Fowler play standing up a lot at Florida? Any thoughts?
John: This is an idea that’s getting floated a lot, and I have nothing philosophically against a 3-4 defensive scheme. The overriding problem with the idea for the Jaguars is it really doesn’t solve their issue of how to get linebackers Paul Posluszny, Myles Jack and Telvin Smith on the field at the same time. While Dante Fowler Jr. indeed would fit into a 3-4 scheme as an outside linebacker, Jack, Posluszny and Smith are more inside linebackers in that scheme.
How many games does Blake have to lose before David Caldwell and this staff loses faith in him? The guy has done more to lose games than to win. He should not be our quarterback next year. Hearing Caldwell’s presser it worries me that he’s going to hire a coach that agrees with him and wants to keep Bortles. Can you say Gabbert 2.0?
John: We’re not there yet.
Mr. O, please correct me if my facts are wrong. The Jaguars are using Myles Jack at the strong-side linebacker position in base packages. When it looks like a power-running formation, or an obvious running situation, they bring in Dan Skuta. However, in obvious passing situations, they switch to the nickel package, and take the strong-side linebacker out for a third cornerback. Now, if this is the case – and you want your best players on the field – why don’t they move Jack to middle linebacker and take Poz out in the nickel package? His sideline-to-sideline speed and playmaking ability needs to be on the field when the opponent is airing it out.
John: Your facts are correct about how Jack and Skuta are being used, and I think that putting Jack on the field in nickel situations is something that will be done in the future. For now, the thought among the coaches is that Paul Posluszny is playing at such a high level that they don’t want to take him out of the nickel package.
It’s hard to believe we were one injury away from playing Ben Koyack at offensive tackle. I blame our lack of drafting at least one offensive lineman last year. It seems like we were scoring in the third round with Brandon Linder and A.J. Cann, so why did we stop there? Just to handle attrition it would seem smart to at least draft one or two offensive line every year … and not just in Rounds 6 or 7. It’s why we can’t run the ball. I can’t think of a great team that didn’t have an outstanding offensive line. To me this is, well, offensive.
JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …
John, I sent a scathing email Sunday right after the game before Gus Bradley was fired criticizing the losing culture around this team. While I don’t take back what I said – there’s definitely a losing culture around this team – I want to give credit where credit is absolutely due. Gus is a man’s man for flying back on the team plane, then having a media availability session the next day where he heaped praise on the organization that just fired him. I can think of about zero other NFL head coaches – or people in general – who have the class to address this kind of situation in such a graceful way. Gus Bradley … you might doubt his coaching ability, but there’s no doubting he’s one hell of a man.
John: This is true. Bradley handled the aftermath of his dismissal Sunday as he handled his entire Jaguars tenure – with dignity and class. He had no problem flying on the charter because he knew he had approached his job the right way, and he knew there was no shame in that. Was it the most enjoyable experience of his life? Surely not. But it was one he could handle. I wasn’t surprised Bradley chose to speak with the media Monday, although he was under no obligation to do so. He chose to do so because he always believed his mission with the Jaguars was about more than just winning. He believed it was about conducting himself in a certain way, shaping players on and off the field and helping to build the Jaguars into a team of which the city and area would be proud. He accomplished the first two. Some would say he didn’t accomplish the latter because the team didn’t win. That’s fine. People can remember and judge Bradley how they choose – and there’s little doubt that the time had come where a move had to be made. But that doesn’t change what he gave to this team and this community. He did handle himself with grace and class, and I think a lot of people will remember him that way.
Wow, John. This is the worst offense in the league. Letting the clock run out with a minute left in the first half and three timeouts? If you can’t trust your quarterback to throw the ball 8-10 yards and get a couple first downs he belongs on the bench.
John: This appears to be developing into more and more of an issue in the last couple of weeks. It seemed against Minnesota last week that the Jaguars were reluctant to have quarterback Blake Bortles throw downfield and to take many chance throws. It felt that way again on Sunday against Houston, and Bortles talked extensively after the game about the need to stay aggressive offensively. He likened the offense in the second half to a basketball team passing the ball around and until the shot clock runs down, then heaving a three-pointer. It’s pretty clear from that statement that Bortles wants to go downfield – and yes, he must be able to do that if he’s going to be an effective NFL quarterback. Can he do that effectively? Can the Jaguars figure out a way for him to do effectively? I’d like to see them attempt it in the last two games.
Nice of Gus to take the time to thank everyone. Many coaches would be bitter and make excuses. He is a class act and his personality will be missed. Go Jags.
John: Yep.
What draft picks would we likely have to give up to trade for Garappolo?
John: My guess is it would probably take a first-round selection to acquire Jimmy Garappolo – though the Jaguars will be selecting early enough in the draft that perhaps a second-round selection would be enough. There also is the school of thought that the past performances of many high-profile quarterbacks with little starting experience following trades – Brock Osweiler, for instance – could make general managers wary of such a move. There also is the possibility that all of this is moot, and that the Patriots might not want to Garappolo. While it appears Tom Brady could play forever, that’s unlikely to actually happen – and that could make the Patriots want to retain Garappolo. We’ll see.
Dear Zone, I am sad Coach Bradley was fired. I feel that he was the victim of horrendous quarterback play. Coach Bradley can definitely have success with a good quarterback. Blake Bortles, on the other hand, doesn’t seem like he’ll have success under any coach.
John: Most coaches can have success with good quarterback play – and in that sense, there’s no question Bortles’ play this season hurt a lot of things around the Jaguars. Can Bortles find success under another coach? I think there’s a very good chance we’re going to find out.
I’m back. Not that you remember. I think I said I wasn’t coming back until both Gus and Blake were gone, but maybe it was only one. Anyway, Blake should feel pretty darn bad. I would say he’s about 89 percent of the reason Gus is gone. You can’t win football games when you don’t have at least average quarterback play. The only reason I don’t feel bad about Gus is because he was so blind to the overlying issue. I liked Gus … wish we could have had that team we all envisioned. I can’t wait till I see an O-Zone titled “Bortles Out.” He has ruined enough jobs. It’s time to go.
John: With Bradley now gone, there are two primary issues facing the team: Who will be the next head coach? And what will that mean for Bortles? It’s hard to say which is more important, though I would lean toward quarterback being the more pressing issue. I have written often that I believe better quarterback play would have meant a better record this season. Would better coaching have meant the same thing? Perhaps, but it’s my experience that quarterback in the NFL is a more important factor than coaching. That’s not me saying “Bortles must go.” It’s not easy to find a franchise quarterback, and you don’t want to give up on one until you’re sure he’s not one. Whatever your opinion on that topic, the Jaguars still believe Bortles can be that guy. He obviously must improve greatly and whoever is coaching this team next year obviously needs to believe in Bortles on some level if the franchise is going to move forward with Bortles and the new head coach. Stay tuned.
It really sucks that Gus had to be let go, but I understand why. I just hope they don’t go the Tom Coughlin route because there is a reason he was fired before. It’s like getting divorced then getting married again to that same person. It makes no sense.
John: Tom Coughlin absolutely makes sense as the Jaguars’ head coach. That doesn’t mean he would match the success he had here from 1996-1999. Past success is no guarantee of future success in the NFL, and – as is the case with any head coach – a lot would have to go right for Coughlin to succeed. But what you want out of a head coach is someone capable of setting the tone for an organization and capable of creating an environment in which players can succeed. Coughlin can do those things. I’d like to see a coach with head-coaching experience, because I think that would be a positive for what is still a young team. Because of those things … yeah, I’d like to see Coughlin as the head coach. That doesn’t mean he’s the only candidate or the best candidate, but I think he’s a darned good candidate.
O-Man, this is the question you don’t want to answer and we all know how you’ll spin – but gonna ask it anyways… Is Blake Bortles really that much better than Tim Tebow?
John: I always smile when people assume there are questions I “don’t want to answer.” I think Bortles is better than Tebow – largely based on Bortles’ play at times in the 2015 season. Honestly, because of Tebow’s appearance in the playoffs, Bortles’ career to date hasn’t been all that much better than Tebow’s. But I do think overall he still has a lot more upside than Tebow. Now, if you look at this season … well, there have been some games for Bortles that have been a real struggle. The important question is whether Bortles’ career will be significantly better than that of Tebow. Right now, it’s close. If he’s going to be “that much better” than Tebow, he has a lot of improving to do in a hurry.
Myles Jack against Houston – eight out of 84 snaps. What are we, the fans, missing? Why isn’t he on the field more? I want the truth. I can handle the truth.
John: There’s not any real mystery here. The coaches are playing Dan Skuta when they think the opponent is going to be in heavy or run-oriented looks. They expected the Texans to be heavy run on Sunday, so Skuta played 31 snaps and Jack played eight. Whether or not you agree with that approach, that’s why it’s happening.
Bottom line for 2017. Defense is well on its way to being very good. Offense has a loooooooonnnngggg way to go.
JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …
Sucks. I understand the move, but I don’t like it. Feels like starting over again.
John: This was one of seemingly countless emails Sunday evening and Monday morning on the obvious topic of the firing of Jaguars Head Coach Gus Bradley – and as might be expected, the emails ran a range of reaction and emotions. Relief. Disappointment. Hope. There were also the expected I-told-you-soers who have wanted Bradley fired for a long time and were ecstatic it “finally” happened. All of that’s fine. It’s part of being a fan, and firing an NFL head coach understandably brings a slew of reaction. The bottom line: however you feel about Bradley as a head coach, it was going to be difficult if not impossible to bring him back after this season. It had simply reached an end. I have written often and will continue to write that Bradley was overly criticized and that to blame him entirely for the 14-48 record over four seasons is to ignore that for the first two and perhaps three seasons it would have been difficult for any coach to have had a better record than he did. But when Bradley received a contract extension late last season, it became obvious the Jaguars were going to need to at least get pretty close to a winning record for Bradley to continue as head coach. That didn’t happen. While Bradley made mistakes and while the Jaguars showed a disturbing lack of discipline at times this season, I don’t believe that Bradley was remotely all that ailed the Jaguars this season. Had quarterback Blake Bortles played marginally better, the Jaguars could have won four or five more games – and if that had happened, the conversation around Bradley would have been much different. But whatever the reason, it was clear it was time for a change. You can only lose so long in the NFL as a head coach before a change is going to be made and it was clearly going to happen in the coming weeks. As it was, it happened Sunday. Does that mean starting over? In one sense, yes, because the direction will be new. But there is talent on this roster and this doesn’t have to be a massive “rebuild” on the scale of 2013. Will a change provide a spark? Will a new direction be the answer? That’s the hope. Jaguars General Manager David Caldwell will speak to the media at 2 p.m. Monday. We’ll start finding out more about that direction then.
We’re not happy Gus was fired. We thought that the future of the franchise is better off without Gus as the head coach – and apparently the owner agreed. Stay tuned.
John: Everyone involved in the decision hopes that the future of the franchise indeed is brighter than the recent past – Bradley absolutely included. I have no doubt that will be the case, and the time indeed had come where a move was inevitable. Will change bring results? That’s the hope. Was Bradley chiefly responsible for what was going wrong with the organization? I have my doubts, but perhaps the shakeup and redirection that a coaching change brings will have the desired results. As you say, stay tuned.
I know you’re hurting now, Zoney. But time heals wounds unless you’re a Jags fan. Then time brings new deeper wounds.
John: This day isn’t remotely about me. Am I sorry that a good man lost his job and didn’t find success despite complete and total heartfelt commitment to that cause? Of course. To feel otherwise would lack a certain amount of decency and compassion, I think. But don’t feel for me. Feel for Bradley, and the families of coaches whose lives will be affected by this. That’s real-life stuff, and not something to celebrate.
Tip of the hat to Coach Gus. Loved his passion and positive attitude. I wish him well wherever he lands.
John: Indeed.
I keep hearing that one of the reasons Gus didn’t have success is because he didn’t bring enough of his “own players” from Seattle to help implement the type of locker-room culture he wanted. How important do you actually think this is to coaching?
John: I actually haven’t heard that theory a whole lot and I don’t know how much different the last four seasons would have been had Bradley brought players from Seattle. Unless, of course, those players were named Earl Thomas, Richard Sherman, Russell Wilson, Marshawn Lynch, Kam …
Maybe if we get an even nicer head coach this time it will work out better.
John: Perhaps. Niceness doesn’t really have anything to do with anything either way, but if you want a mean guy … who knows … maybe Shad Khan and David Caldwell will shoot that to the top of the list.
The next head coach should not be stuck with No. 5 because he is a coach killer. I hope they give him the chance to start with who he wants at quarterback. But can we admit this rebuild was a failure and no team should ever rebuild like this again?
John: I think there’s still a lot to be said for the way the Jaguars tried to rebuild the culture of the organization. And there’s little question that you must try to rebuild primarily through the draft. I would say in retrospect that the main issue that hurt the Jaguars the last couple of seasons was an overall lack of experienced core players at key spots in the roster. This remains a young team at some critical spots without core players who have been with the Jaguars since the beginning of their careers. It’s difficult to have such players when you draft poorly and that was part of the dilemma General Manager David Caldwell faced when he took over the roster. It takes time to draft and develop your own core guys into six- and-seven-year veterans. That’s what this team really, really lacks—that, of course, and reliable play at quarterback.
Bench Bortles. You can’t argue otherwise.
John: I doubt that happens this season.
Call it what you will but hiring a new coach is a rebuild. Oh the pain of being a Jaguar fan …
John: OK.
Ramsey is other worldly. That is all. #DTWD
John: It would have been easy before the announcement of Bradley’s dismissal to answer every question in O-Zone Late Night about Jalen Ramsey – his game Sunday was that memorable and his performance was that spectacular. He made at least six momentum-turning, highlight plays – and his best play may not even have been the 25-yard interception return that set up a first-half field goal. He also broke up a fade pass to wide receiver DeAndre Hopkins in the second quarter to cap a key goal-line stand, and he leveled Hopkins to break up a potential first-down converting pass. This was a battle all day between two big-time players and both players got their share of victories in one-on-one battles. But Ramsey is destined to be a big-time, All-Pro cornerback in the NFL – and Sunday was a vivid example of why.
John, all you have to go on when you hire a coach with no experience is what he did as a coordinator and his ability to knock the interview out of the park. If a guy has been a head coach you have a better idea of what he will do. We went new guy last time, KC went fired guy … fired guy has been pretty good.
John: You’re right. Andy Reid has been successful in Kansas City. And John Fox has struggled mightily with the Chicago Bears after coaching in Super Bowls in Carolina and Denver. If you hired the right coach and put him in the right situation, it usually will yield results whether or not the guy has experience. If you hire the wrong coach and put him in the wrong situation, it won’t. I have nothing against hiring an experienced head coach with a record of NFL success. In fact, I’d prefer it. But let’s not pretend it’s a fail-safe formula. There’s no such thing as a fail-safe formula for hiring a head coach. If one existed, every team would use it and every team would win Super Bowls.
Where do we go from here? As you say, it’s not always about coaching in the NFL … even though, it’s always about coaching in the NFL.
John: Gus Bradley was just fired Sunday night, so the answer obviously is that the Jaguars don’t yet know exactly where they will go from here. Caldwell will speak to the media Monday afternoon, and I don’t imagine the criteria for the search for the next coach will be provided any particular detail. My personal belief is the specifics – defensive/offensive, players coach/disciplinarian, experienced/inexperienced – don’t matter all that much. I don’t even really care all that much if a guy has head coaching experience, though my guess is that will be a priority in this search. Find a head coach you believe in, and go from there. A wise man once said that there’s no fail-safe formula because if there was everyone would use it. I wish I could remember who that guy was. I really thought he was cool.
Here’s one last one for Gus.
JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …
Why is David Caldwell getting a pass when it was his decision to draft Bortles? Caldwell’s other first-round picks have not been stellar nor have his free-agent signings.
John: I guess I’m never sure what “getting a pass” means when it comes to coaches or general managers. Jaguars General Manager David Caldwell has come under plenty of criticism from fans and media this season, and when Owner Shad Khan evaluates what’s going on with the Jaguars I’m quite certain he asks Caldwell questions and evaluates his performance. Does getting a pass mean not getting fired? If so, then yes … Caldwell might “get a pass.” I hope that’s the case, because despite not accomplishing the impossible task hitting on every free agent and draft selection over a four-year period he has put a structure in place and is building a foundation that can lead to this team to competitiveness and beyond. I don’t know if Khan agrees with that. We’ll see. Look, I get that people are talking a lot right now about who will “get a pass” and who won’t. The argument right now against Caldwell seems to be he “missed” on quarterback Blake Bortles. I don’t know that that’s written in stone yet, and I don’t know that missing on a quarterback must be grounds for firing – public perception notwithstanding. Overall I think Caldwell returning is the right move – because while the timetable may feel too long, the organization’s course in terms of young talent and potential moving forward remains strong. I don’t yet know what will happen on this front. I don’t know that many outside Khan do. Stay tuned.
Would you be upset with the fans if they throw a parade for Bradley’s 50th loss?
John: Fans can do what they want. I try not to let their actions dictate my emotions. I’ve learned it’s better that way.
I know I am in the minority in the city, but I would like to give Dave and Gus one more year before we pull the plug. Their drafting seems to have us on the right track. Not all of the free-agent signings have been great, but the contracts were structured correctly and we know free agency is a crap shoot at best. If Blake had not regressed to a high-school quarterback, I believe the team would have more wins and be more competitive. I hate to think we are going to start over with the front office and coaches and change philosophy again when maybe one more year would put us where we need to be. Your thoughts?
John: You indeed are in the minority. I don’t know what will happen after the season. I wish I did. As I have said often in recent weeks … while I favor continuity in the NFL on a philosophical level, considering the expectations entering this season, continuity in this instance would be an exceedingly difficult path.
Great News!! Actually, I don’t have any regarding the Jags, can you help?
John: Not actually, no.
Would you consider Brandon Allen to be a waste of a roster spot this season considering he’s been inactive for every game this season and the fact that most teams passed on him in the draft due to his small hands?
John: Not particularly, no. We won’t know for several seasons if Brandon Allen was a waste of a roster spot. If he never is the Jaguars’ primary backup quarterback and/or if the Jaguars never acquire anything for him in a trade, then perhaps he was a waste. If not, not.
When you have been as bad as this franchise has been projecting and speculating quarterbacks, it does make sense to hold on to Bortles and extend the pain even longer. Then, he can twist the knife and add on to his record.
John: OK.
Sometimes you must look at the stupidity represented in your mailbox and just shake your head.
John: If I ever am tempted to do such a thing I look in the mirror and remember my readers have the ability to shake their heads, too.
Would you consider sitting most of the starters in the final games to avoid injury? Or would you consider not starting people if they make it on the injury list (only start people who are “fully” healthy)? Or not make any changes in regards to starting players? I know we want to win now, but it would be nice to be fully healthy starting next year (but what do I know). Thanks!
John: I would be cautious with injured players in the sense that I wouldn’t play a player if an injury had them more at risk for further injury than otherwise would be the case. Aside from that … nah.
On Monday, January 2 I suspect there will be changes announced in Jacksonville and maybe a few other NFL cities around the country. Will you be working that day?
John: To the best of my recollection I have worked the day after the NFL regular-season finale for each of the last 21 years. I see no reason why this season should be any different.
I know you hate when I ask this O-Man, but I’d love to get your thoughts. You actually think it’s OK to have a segment called Jags of the Round Table at a square table? C’mon, throw me a bone here.
John: I have no idea what you’re talking about.
I don’t get the distaste for Khan’s decision to finish out the season with Bradley. What does firing him now, as opposed to at the end of the season, do? If anything, I would say it shows we have an owner who will let you see through what you’re trying to accomplish. I don’t think of it as a bad thing. It was a four-year plan, and we are at the end of the fourth year. It isn’t ideal, and I’m definitely against retaining Bradley. But I remember Mel Tucker. I remember how irrelevant we still were. I know people want something to change, but this season is almost over and a change now will do nothing, in my opinion. Thanks for what you do, John!
John: I don’t get worked up about midseason coaching changes one way or the other. That’s because they historically have no real lasting benefit, and at the same time, there’s no real benefit or loss to whatever decision gets made. The interim coach usually is largely forgotten by the time a new coach is hired in January, and the mood/culture at that point within the building is dominated by the new coach and the changes that have taken place. Change coaches midseason, don’t change coaches midseason … whatever … the decision pales in comparison to what’s coming in a few weeks/months.
I think the worst part about this time of year, besides everything, is that if and when we win one of these garbage games it just hurts draft position and so I have doubly nothing to look forward to.
John: OK.
Big O, the question and answer regarding A-Rob’s body language and frustration sent shudders of worry through me. The one thing the Jaguars can cling to right now, and it’s a significant thing indeed, is that there is a growing core of good/great – most importantly, young – players around which the future will grow. But is there a chance that many of these young stars will simply abandon ship at the first opportunity leaving us staring down a new rebuild?
John: The Jaguars’ good, young players are under contract through at least the 2017 season. There is no reason the Jaguars can’t re-sign the core players they want to keep before they hit the open market.
I’m back. Actually, let’s face it: I never left. I think firing Gus Bradley is not the answer. When you step back and really think about it, while not all things have gone well everywhere else all the time, there is only one part of the team that woefully underperformed and that is the quarterback position. Do everything, anything, you can to find a quarterback that can play at a Top 15 level and this team is pretty good.
John: Welcome back, Scott.
It’s beyond me how arm-chair quarterbacks and media know-it-alls think they know more about who, how much and where players play than the coaches.
John: Sometimes those arm-chair quarterbacks are right. And a lot of times they’re wrong. Sometimes the media know-it-alls are right, too. A lot of times they’re wrong. That’s what makes it exciting and fun.
Who is (or are) the people responsible for a 14-47 record? Ownership? General manager? Coaches? Players? Fans? O-Man?