O-Zone: Hmmmm?

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

David from Maplewood, NJ:
John, I’m on the fence; probably some other fans are as well. Doug Marrone becoming the permanent head coach would allow some continuity, which is a point that cannot be ignored. The rate of young quarterback success reduces significantly the more systems they have to learn and I’m not ready to give up on Blake Bortles – if for no other reason than there isn’t an obvious franchise quarterback option in the draft. That being said, it wasn’t all Gus Bradley … the rest of the staff and, of course, the players share responsibility. This is complicated – and it’s frankly more complicated because of how the team performed Saturday.

John: This will be the No. 1 topic this week among Jaguars fans and observers – and considering the Jaguars’ level of play in Doug Marrone’s first game as interim head coach, it’s an understandable, important topic. The Jaguars on Saturday had their most impressive victory of the season — and one of their most impressive victories in several seasons. This was a Titans team with their season on the line – and it was a Titans team that was playing at a high level. They were a Top 10-ranked offense that had just won on the road against Kansas City, a team that has a real chance to go deep in the postseason. The Jaguars didn’t fluke into beating the Titans; they led the entire game and held Tennessee to its second-lowest yardage total of the season. The Jaguars also played their best offensive game of the season. Was this all because of Marrone? Was it a pressure release after Bradley was relieved of his duties the previous week? Was it the post-coaching-change surge that is relatively common in the NFL but often not sustainable? Those questions are hard to answer. You don’t want to overemphasize one victory – impressive though it was. Teams often play well immediately following a coaching change because of the urgency associated with the shakeup – and many teams settle back down to earth. That’s the argument for pumping the brakes somewhat in this situation. At the same time, Marrone is a very capable head coach who almost certainly will be an NFL head coach soon. He showed himself very capable for two seasons in Buffalo. It would be very unwise to ignore a very, very good candidate just because of familiarity.

Daniel from Duval:
RAMSEY!! He is gonna be a shutdown corner for 10-plus years.

John: Jalen Ramsey indeed appears as if he’s going to be a front-line cornerback for a long, long time – and he’s going to be intriguing to watch. I don’t know that he’s quite the lock-down cornerback on the level of a Darrelle Revis in his prime, but that’s all-time, all-time stuff. Ramsey’s physicality, his ability to defend the ball in the air, his ability to play the run, his ability to separate receivers from the ball … well, I don’t know that I’ve ever seen anything quite like the way Ramsey does those things from the cornerback position. He is headed for greatness. Soon.

Roger from Valdosta, GA:
Hey, just wanted to let you know that I took the Jags in my weekly football pool because you said they would not lose. And guess what: I won the pot. Forty-six other people took the Titans. Thanks, O. You ever in Valdosta, buzz me. Beer is on me.

John: Good for you, Roger – although it’s still beyond me why more people didn’t realize the Jaguars simply were not going to lose Sunday. It was right there for all to see.

John from Clearwater, FL:
I keep reading something that concerns me more than the losses, the uncertainty of a coach or just about anything else. I keep reading that there was too much pressure on this team and now the season’s over and there’s no pressure and they played well. We’ve seen this in games where once it’s garbage time, the team suddenly plays different. It’s very concerning going forward that we have a team that cannot even be competent because the game is on the line. How do you fix that? Gus Bradley seemed to be the most easygoing coach ever and there was still too much pressure, apparently?

John: I’ll be honest: I don’t know quite how to interpret that storyline, either – though I do think when it comes to the team as a whole, the “too-much-pressure” theme has been a little overblown. On an individual basis, quarterback Blake Bortles indeed said afterward he may have been placing too much pressure on himself – and that he was able to exhale and play loose Saturday. If so, then that’s a good sign that he can play at a high level – and it’s a concerning sign that he was unable to do so for 14 games for whatever reason. I don’t know that the rest of the team was all that loose on Saturday, because I don’t know that “looseness” is that big of a deal outside the quarterback position. It seemed the rest of the team played with a real urgency, so perhaps that was the difference. Maybe I’m just not smart enough to know how pressure did or didn’t impact the team. I do think I’m smart enough to know whoever is the head coach next season needs to figure out how to get Bortles to play as he did Saturday. If he plays to that level, the pressure on everyone – including himself – will lessen a great deal.

Mario from Orlando, FL:
If coaching changes translate to teams playing better and getting wins immediately, then coaches would be fired and hired left and right. Time to enjoy this win, but it’s also time to keep things in perspective and take it one day at a time. Go Jags!

John: Nah … it’s time for knee-jerk reactions and jumping to conclusions. Those things are easier and a lot more fun.

Kent from Jacksonville :
One of the biggest differences between Gus Bradley and Doug Marrone was summed up to me after the Chris Ivory fumble. Marrone was in Ivory’s ear coaching him up whereas Gus tended to be their buddy more with a pat on the shoulder and a good job buddy we’ll get ’em next time. The team looked like what everyone thought they would look like back in September. Guys played like they were being held accountable for the first time since Gus Bradley took over. Just some thoughts, what do you think?

John: The Accountability Issue is a hot topic among Jaguars fans this week, and understandably so. Marrone without question brings a harder, old-school persona. He brought that style last week with a few tweaks in approach. Did that wake players up? It’s quite possible, even probable. Such is the nature of change – and there’s no doubt that accountability is a big thing for Marrone. Could Bradley have been tougher and more old-school hard line in this area? Sure. At the same time, it’s incorrect to say there was no accountability under Bradley and that players were never accountable in the past four years. That’s going too far the other way.

MrPadre from Kinglsand, GA:
It’s kind of ironic that when Bortles plays poorly and the Jags lose it’s all because of the quarterback but when they win and he plays great it’s all about the “team.” **sigh**

John: Bortles played as well in the first half against the Titans as he has in any game of his NFL career. It’s probably not a coincidence that the Jaguars had fuller control of the game than they have had in any previous game in his NFL career. When the quarterback position is shaky, a team often is shaky. Bortles was steady in the first half and the Jaguars’ hold on the game felt correspondingly steady.

Rob from Brunswick, GA:
Who do you think is our biggest rival John? I know everyone says the Titans. And that’s certainly plausible. Early on, I think it was clearly the Broncos. For many years after that, it was surely the Colts. If you asked the players, who do you think they would say is the current most hated rival?

John: I could list the Colts or the Titans, and I suppose they would qualify because of history and/or status as divisional opponents. But I honestly don’t think the Jaguars have a real rival right now. I don’t get a sense Jaguars players have any real hate or animosity toward any other team – at least not enough to make things interesting. It’s hard to have a rival until one team or the other is losing/gaining something from winning or losing, so it’s hard to have a rival when your team is losing double-digit games every season. When the Jaguars begin to win again they’ll develop rivals soon enough. That’s when a whole lot of things will get fun again, too.

Jags Fan 818 from Jacksonville:
WOW – I finally lost my voice this season!!! So excited!! Go JAGS!!!

John: What?

O-Zone: The great truth

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Miguel from Section 144 and Duuuuvall:
This is why you don’t bench the quarterback until you are absolutely sure he’s not your guy. He has to get better, but we haven’t seen the best of Blake Bortles yet. #DTWD

John: This may be the biggest long-term takeaway – and the biggest positive – from the Jaguars’ 38-17 victory over the Titans Saturday. It’s far too early to know if interim head coach Doug Marrone has a chance at the permanent job, and it’s really too early to know what Bortles’ future holds. But no matter who is hired as the Jaguars’ permanent head coach, it’s a safe bet that Bortles probably is going to either be the starting quarterback or a serious contender for the position. That’s true because of the difficulty of finding a franchise quarterback or even a front-level starter. And yes … Saturday’s performance is exactly why you don’t bench a potential franchise quarterback until you’re certain he’s the guy. Bortles didn’t show on Saturday that he is definitely a franchise quarterback. He has a lot of improvement to make in a lot of areas before that’s the case. But he did show why the Jaguars haven’t given up on the possibility. That’s a start.

Maty from Easton:
O-Man, how good was it to see Dante Fowler Jr. have a productive game and flash some of that rare talent?

John: If you want the Jaguars to start contending for the postseason in the near future … very.

Marcus from Jacksonville:
I know the Jaguars cannot speak to currently employed coaches until the season is over, but they are able to speak to coaches who are not currently coaching or – presumably – who are currently employed by the Jags. If they choose one of those coaches, are there any rules preventing them from finalizing a deal before the end of the season? I’m sure it won’t happen because they have to do their due diligence and interview a wide variety of coaches, so I’m sure they won’t make a decision that quickly. I’m just wondering, because if they really want a coach who isn’t currently coaching or is already on the team, maybe they would want to lock him down before other teams start their coaching searches.

John: The Jaguars indeed could interview unemployed coaches and college coaches before the end of the regular season, but they almost certainly will not hire a coach before end of the regular season. One obstacle could be the Rooney Rule, but – as you point out – that’s not the biggest reason. The biggest reason is that to do so would mean severely reducing the pool of candidates – and even if you think you know your target, you would rather have a more thorough process.

Al from Fernandina Beach, FL:
John, what is going on with Myles Jack? I can’t always watch the game so I look for print and stats on him and can barely find anything – and the stats in the box score don’t even list his name for Saturday’s game. Is he hurt? Is he a disappointment? Is he playing behind Poz and can’t get on the field? What is going on with him?

John: The story with Myles Jack remains the same. He is starting at the Otto linebacker position, which is the strong-side linebacker position in the Jaguars’ defense. He is playing mostly in pass-oriented or base situations with Dan Skuta playing in more run-heavy situations – although Jack appeared to be in some more run-heavy spots Saturday. Jack is neither hurt nor a disappointment. He’s not playing middle- or weak-side linebacker because Paul Posluszny and Telvin Smith are playing at a high level at those spots. He is playing fewer snaps than otherwise would be the case because Otto plays fewer snaps than the other two linebacker positions – and he is sharing time there. I believe Jack will be on the field in some full-time capacity next season. Where that will be, time will tell.

Hippy from Fleming Island:
If Jalen Ramsey isn’t the best football player I’ve seen in a Jags jersey, he’s destined to be. He has made more impact plays in the last two games than average corners make all year. Do you think he plays at an All-Pro level in Year Two?

John: Ramsey indeed appears well on his way to being one of the best players in franchise history. That sounds like hyperbole – until you watch Ramsey play. Then, it sounds less like hyperbole and more like something that’s destined to be the case. I would caution it’s wise to remember that to be better than Tony Boselli/Fred Taylor/Jimmy Smith, you have to play at or near a Hall of Fame-level, but yeah … Ramsey has the skill set to sail in that stratosphere. As far as being an All-Pro in Year 2 … well, it’s not out of the question. In fact, it’s a very good possibility.

Dave from Jacksonville:
All about Bortles? He played much better, but he didn’t carry the team to a win. The entire team played significantly better in ALL three phases. Many guys had their best game of the season. You can’t chalk this up to coincidence. Bortles has had better days than this and usually those turn out to be losses. I can’t believe you are spinning this like this was all about Bortles playing better. We agree that Gus is awesome human, being but this is more proof he’s just wasn’t a good fit here for whatever reason.

John: Saturday’s game wasn’t all about Bortles. Not by any stretch. But Bortles completed 15 of his first 16 passes, and threw for more than 200 yards in the first half. He was efficient and accurate and made good decisions. I don’t know that he actually has had better games than Saturday’s – and if he has it’s a very, very short list. He set the tone early, and for one of the first times in his career you could point to him and say, “He played well and was a reason for the Jaguars winning and did very, very little to hurt the team.” That has been sorely missing this season – and its absence is the biggest reason the Jaguars are 3-12 and not around .500. Was Saturday about Doug Marrone? Absolutely, because the Jaguars played their most complete game of the season under his watch – and did so in very difficult circumstances. But to think that Bortles’ play wasn’t a major, major difference between Saturday and the first 14 games … well, I guess it really is spinning to think that. Spin away, O-Zone. Spin away.

Sam from Orlando, FL:
Do you think the Jags will re-sign Prince Amukamara? Man I hope so.

John: I do think there’s a good chance Jaguars will re-sign Amukamara. I don’t think they will do so if he demands a long-term, break-the-bank contract, but I don’t know that he will be quite at that level of free agency. But Amukamara deserves some credit. His goal this season upon signing a one-year free-agent contract was to play the entire season and prove he could stay healthy. He missed two games early in the season – Week 2 and 3 – and was upset when that happened, but he has played the last 12 consecutive games. If you didn’t know injuries had been an issue throughout his career you wouldn’t know it by watching him this season. The Jaguars’ secondary may be their most improved unit this season. Ramsey is the most obvious reason, but Amukamara is a factor in that, too.

Jacob from NC:
I do not believe it was “all coaching,” and in the NFL it probably never is. However, all I hear from you is a sarcastic “it’s all coaching” or are you saying it’s really never coaching? What proof could you receive to make you say it was coaching? Or is it just “not always coaching” and that is final? Thanks

John: I’ve rarely if ever said “it’s never coaching” in the NFL – because as I often have said, coaching does matter in the NFL. What I long have said is that coaching is far too often blamed for all that ails a team – and coaches are often fired far too quickly at the expense of continuity. It was clear on Saturday that something made a difference for the Jaguars, and Marrone absolutely must get credit for the Jaguars playing better. There was clearly a surge and an urgency that hadn’t been there before. At the same time, to say that there was a dramatic difference in the game plan all because of Marrone – or that Bortles suddenly was calm, collected, poised and accurate all because of Marrone is probably a stretch, too. The Jaguars played well Saturday, far better than I or anyone else imagined they would. But when I say, “It’s always coaching in the NFL,” all I ever mean is it’s not always coaching. That’s because it’s players in the NFL far more often than not.

Moodachay from Corrales, NM:
It’s always coaching John, always.

John: Yeah, I know.

O-Zone: Merry Krimma

JACKSONVILLE – Merry Christmas to all.

Let’s get to it …

Joshua from Lakeland, FL:
John, the players wanted to win for Gus. They played their hearts out and it was amazing to watch. But why couldn’t they play this inspired while Gus was still here? Is it guilt that’s motivating them?

John: That’s indeed the $1 Million Question today – and of course, we’ll never know for sure. I don’t think it was guilt, necessarily – though the victory over Tennessee Saturday certainly was a galvanized, impressive effort. And while there will be cynics who say, “See, it was all coaching after all and Gus Bradley should have been fired long ago,” Saturday’s result can’t reasonably be all attributed to a coaching change – though it is always coaching in the NFL. So, what was it? Why now? After talking to players in the locker room Saturday, the most reasonable explanation was a combination of urgency and absence of pressure. The urgency came about from a lot of players perhaps realizing for the first time that nothing is guaranteed in the NFL, and that a lack of performance has serious ramifications. The absence of pressure is about quarterback Blake Bortles, who told reporters after the game that he had been placing pressure on himself and was able to exhale Saturday. There’s rarely one reason things happen in the NFL, but perhaps those two factors help explain a little of the difference between what happened Saturday and what had been going on with this team all season.

Bill from Hawthorn Woods, IL:
I … they … um, the off … speechless. Merry Christmas!

John: Merry Krimma.

Ryan from Charlotte, NC:
Yo.

John: ‘Sup?

Don from Duval:
It’s amazing what coaching can do.

John: It’s always coaching in the NFL – and it’s never, ever, ever, ever the quarterback playing by far his best game of the season.

Tim from Winston Salem, NC:
This is what we expected all year!

John: It’s indeed what Jaguars players expected all year, too – perhaps not all victories being quite so one-sided, but certainly something closer to the level of play we saw Saturday. That’s what made the victory somewhat bittersweet for players and coaches alike. The Jaguars truly wanted to make this work for Gus Bradley. Something linebacker Paul Posluszny said afterward perhaps rings as true as anything I heard after the game. He said that perhaps Bradley’s dismissal sent a real message for the first time to some players that a lack of performance indeed can mean real ramifications. Did Bradley get that across enough? Perhaps not, though one game might not be enough of a sample size to know for sure. At the same time, it seemed a more relaxed team. Whatever it was, it was the right mix on Saturday. Will it last? We’ll see.

Chris from Toronto, Canada:
It’s a Christmas miracle!

John: Ho, ho, ho.

Richard from Las Vegas, NV:
Great win all the way around. And we could talk about Robinson or Bortles, but that was Dante Fowler Jr.’s best game as a pro against a very good Tennessee line.

John: Indeed it was. Fowler by my count disrupted at least two passes by Titans quarterback Marcus Mariota and he also had a first-half sack that helped set the tone early. It has become vogue among some observers to call Fowler a bust – and one good game does not a big-time player make – but Fowler this season has shown flashes of why he was the No. 3 overall selection in the 2015 NFL Draft, and the violence of his first-half sack was such a flash. He must improve his pass-rushing technique and he must improve in a lot of areas, but the window on Fowler is far from being closed.

Mike from Jacksonville:
Wow that was fun! Let’s do that more often next year!

John: Winning is cool. People like it.

Jon from Portland, OR:
Doug Marrone for head coach 2k17!!!

John: I don’t know that one late-season victory will catapult Marrone into the favorite’s position for the head coaching search. Realistically, this is going to be an extensive search. Reports are that the Jaguars will interview Tom Coughlin next week, and I expect the search to take some unforeseen twists and turns. But Marrone is a proven head coach who now is 16-17 in the NFL. I wouldn’t color him remotely a favorite, but stranger things have happened – and there are far, far worse candidates.

Joe from Surf City:
Ummmmmmm??????

John: I got nothing.

Renee from Jax:
John! I forgot to tell you! MERRY CHRISTMAS! And a HAPPY NEW YEAR! Sing it. It makes you feel good.

John: OK.

Ty from Duval:
Well, O-man … maybe you should have guaranteed wins earlier in the season …

John: I knew there was no way the Jaguars were going to lose to the Titans on Sunday. It simply and absolutely was not going to happen.

Dave from Duval:
If I woke tomorrow with my head sewn to the carpet I wouldn’t be more surprised.

John: I’m excited about it, too, Clark.

Steve from Hudson, FL:
I respectfully disagree with your opinion on full-time officials. Year-round physical conditioning and film study would greatly improve the craft of officiating. Being in the correct position to see, spotting the ball correctly and consistently as far as time – even working on their huddles to communicate. We expect players and coaches to put in this kind of effort in year round … why not officials? If it was a full-time job you got paid well to preform – and if you could get cut, released, benched for poor performances – I think the officiating would greatly improve. The league makes plenty of money. There is no reason not to improve this part of their product. Why would you go cheap on such an important part of the business?

John: You’re referring to my opinion that the NFL doesn’t need full-time officials. While coaches indeed work pretty much year-round, players typically are away from facilities from January through mid-April – and again from mid-June through the end of July. That makes it about a seven-month-a-year job, with some of that year spent strictly working out – and unable to communicate with coaches about football. Look, I get that people are fired up about this officiating-year-round thing. I’m just not one who believes seven or eight officials employed year-round will dramatically improve officiating. It’s a game of big, strong, fast men that moves at a high rate of speed. Calls get missed. That’s going to happen whether or not officials are employed year-round.

Tom from Jacksonville:
Mr. O: First, the helmets are still gross. Second, I never thought that when driving down University and watching “THOSE” apartments being built that I would see a world-class sports authority spring from there. Third, may you and your family (and Coach Gus) have a safe and Merry Christmas. Not too much egg nog tho.

John: I was going to say there’s no such thing as too much egg nog. That is not true.

Josh from Grand Island, NE:
So, Zone … what are your plans for this year’s holiday party since cornering the Culligan girl under the mistletoe is out of the equation?

John: I have no idea what you’re talking about.

Nathan from St. Augustine, FL:
If anyone needed smoking-gun evidence that Gus should have been fired after last season, this game was it! This season should not have been the disaster it turned out to be. Let’s hope the next head coach brings more of what we saw Saturday. It’s time! Merry Christmas, Jags nation.

John: Saturday was a big victory for the Jaguars. Does it mean the Jaguars would be over .500 if Bradley had been dismissed sooner? There are going to be those who believe that – and if people want to believe it, that’s fine. For the sake of Jaguars fan and the franchise, I certainly hope it was all coaching and that the team will now turn around in a big way. It’s probably a little more realistic to think that the team played a bit more relaxed with a little more urgency Saturday, and that what we saw Saturday was a very encouraging one-game surge that might not necessarily be what the team would have been all along … but hey, who wants to hear that? It’s Christmas. Enjoy the feeling.

Charlie from Jacksonville:
There will undoubtedly be those who try to assert this victory is proof that Gus’ coaching was all that was holding the team back, which is preposterous. But I do believe there is a grain of truth the team was pressing significantly in an effort to save Gus’ job because he was so well liked.

John: I think perhaps it was more than a grain, but yeah …

Wes from Green Cove Springs, FL:
I know: it’s players not coaches. But do you think players might play better with better coaching/game planning?

John: The people game-planning for the Jaguars on Saturday were the people who game-planned for the first 14 games of the season.

Logan from Wichita, KS:
Merry Christmas to you, too Zone, O-man, O, Mr. Oehser, John Oehser … call you anything but late for dinner right? Merry Krimaaaa!

John: Merry Krimma.

O-Zone: Sane asylum

JACKSONVILLE – Game-day, Christmas Eve O-Zone.

Let’s get to it …

Jeff from Rutland, MA:

If I were interim head coach, and a candidate to return in 2017, I’d want to test out all my offensive weapons in these next two games before I applied – so I’d know more about what I was getting into. But that’s me.

John: In the case of Doug Marrone with the Jaguars – as is the case with most NFL interim head coaches – he had been on the coaching staff an extensive period of time before ascending to interim head coach. Marrone has coached the offensive line, so he has a pretty good idea the talent on the roster at that spot. He has a relatively good idea the talent at other positions, too. Could he play third-team quarterback Brandon Allen in the final two games? I suppose – and if he did, he automatically would become a phenomenally popular guy among a big portion of the fan base. But I don’t see it happening because Marrone and Jaguars General Manager David Caldwell appear to believe Blake Bortles is still the team’s best option to win. As far as other spots on either offense or defense, I can think of few spots outside perhaps Myles Jack at Otto linebacker where I think there are players potentially being under-used. Still, the conversation is in a very real sense moot. I wouldn’t say there’s no chance of Marrone being the head coach next season, but it’s obviously pretty slim – and I don’t think he’s coaching the next two games with the idea of looking ahead to next season.

Pedal Bin from Farnborough, Hampshire:

Mighty ‘O,’ Happy Christmas from this side of The Pond. One ‘fer Krimma?!

John: One fer Krimma.

Daniel from Urban:

Two things, John: 1. After consistently saying he wouldn’t fire Gus Bradley during the season, what changed Shad Khan’s mind? The Houston loss didn’t seem worse than that Titans loss. Second, any chance we could see Marty Schottenheimer on the coaching candidate list? I get the playoff knock but the man always seems to build competitive teams.

John: The timing of Bradley’s departure isn’t really the mystery people seem to believe. Khan and General Manager David Caldwell met in Dallas at the NFL Owners Meetings last week and made the final determination that Bradley indeed would need to be dismissed. It had seemed obvious to everyone that dismissing Bradley was likely and even inevitable, but that was when the final decision was made. At that point, with both wanting to start the process of searching for a head coach, it was decided to make the move as soon as possible. Because it was already so late in the week, it was decided to wait until after the Houston game. The timing of the decision had nothing to do with the Texans loss – and the decision actually had been made to do it whether or not the Jaguars won or lost in Houston. That was really what went into the decision; it wasn’t more complicated than that. Could it have been handled better? I suppose, but there aren’t many really good ways to part ways with a head coach – particularly one everyone admired as much as Bradley. As far as Schottenheimer, I was a big fan of his when he coached and never thought he got the credit he deserved as a front-line, all-time head coach. But I don’t see him becoming a head coach again. It would appear that time has passed.

Hippy Ryan from Fleming Island, FL:

I’m confident every player on this team felt responsible for the letdown that ended in Gus’s release as they shook his hand on the plane last Sunday. Let’s hope something positive will be gained as a team. Tighten up

John: #Tightenup

Biff from Jacksonville:

Hey O, can you ask Bill from Danville to share that crystal ball he uses to verify that Jack wouldn’t play better than the two veterans in front of him?

John: Bill may not have a crystal ball, but Paul Posluszny and Telvin Smith have played well enough this season the he probably doesn’t need one. I’m all for seeing Myles Jack on the field more, but at the expense of Posluszny or Smith? Nah.

Matt from Easton, PA:

In his exit interview, Gus revealed something that makes it clear to me (and I imagine many others) why he wasn’t successful as a head coach and excelled as a defensive coordinator. He explained that once a player is given to him, he will work as hard as he can to help that player be the best he can be until the player is taken away from him by someone else. With Seattle, he had a head coach to give and take players from him. No one was going to make those decisions for him with the Jaguars, and he admitted that he needs someone in that role or he will constantly stick with the guys he has (i.e. Bortles). Am I just rambling here or do you think there is any truth to this thought?

John: I would say there’s probably some truth to it. Bradley certainly seemed to think so. There were many, many reasons the Jaguars struggled over the past four seasons, and I can’t say this was near the top of the list. But is it a way Bradley could have done better? Sure.

Logan from Wichita, KS:

HAHAHA … I will believe your “guarantees” when I see it. Till then I highly doubt your “guarantees” because a 2-12 record, 44 yards of offense last week and a 36-22 beat down from the Titans last time that was more like 36-0 says you are delusional. Better put down the spiked egg nog for a bit there, O.

John: My guarantee that the Jaguars won’t lose Sunday has nothing to do with the 2-12 record, the 44 yards offense last week (150 yards, actually) and/or the beat down in October. I won’t be drinking any egg nog until Sunday because, either. I might drink it Saturday after the game, though.

Chuck from Jacksonville:

At this point, the comment “the coaches think” has no credibility. The current coaches will be gone, so I don’t get why we should agree to the concept that Jack should not play more. Bad coaching decisions are the reason they are out. So the one regarding Jack, in theory, could be a wrong one.

John: No one’s asking you to agree to anything. It’s very much OK if you don’t.

Kyle from Jacksonville:

I know quite a few people have brought up Myles Jack and the reasons they believe he should or should not be playing. I understand those points. However, it seems everybody is only looking at this in a very in-the-box fashion – i.e., “We have three linebacker spots, which one does he play?” They should be asking “Is Myles Jack one of our 11 best defensive players?” If the answer is yes, get him on the field, no excuses. I don’t care if that means somebody making a move to safety, get him on the field. Last I checked our defense is ranked 24th against the run so any excuse involving Dan Skuta as a run defender is a hollow one. Also, is your house on fire, Clark? Merry Christmas, O!

John: It’s very easy to say “move someone to safety,” but the reality is you’re not going to move Paul Posluszny to safety, so that leaves Smith or Jack. Smith has played linebacker since entering the NFL and has played it at a high level, so you don’t want to move him. That leaves Jack, which would mean moving a linebacker to a new position in his first NFL season. That sounds easy and it might work in Madden. Perhaps it’s not as easy in real life. As far as Skuta is concerned, I find the notion that the coaches feel they need to make an “excuse” to play him curious. Why would they force Skuta on the field over a highly-touted draft selection if they didn’t think he was the best player to play? What possible incentive would they have to do that? Also, don’t overemphasize rushing yards allowed per game as a way of measuring the Jaguars’ run defense. A better gauge might be yards per run allowed. The Jaguars rank seventh in that area at 3.8 yards per attempt. And by the way, Kyle: Those little lights? They’re not twinkling.

Gabe from Washington, DC:

“I will go a step further and guarantee they will not beat the Jaguars Sunday.” Very sneaky, O. Everyone knows that it’s always the Jaguars who beat the Jaguars.

John: My guarantee that the Jaguars will not lose Sunday has nothing to do with the Jaguars propensity for beating themselves on Sundays.

Brian from Round Rock, TX:

To the surprise of sports fans everywhere, the definition of insanity is not doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results. In fact, practicing something is often the act of doing the same thing over and over again, expecting to improve at the task. Look it up! Am I right?

John: Yes, you are.

O-Zone: Harder than it looks

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Bob from St. Augustine, FL:
Wait a minute, Oh Willy Namath … are you actually guaranteeing a victory or is this simply a warranty?

John: I guaranteed that the Jaguars will not lose to the Titans Sunday. And I stand by that. No way, no how.

John from Browns Mills, NJ:
What happened? Blake looked great last year. I really thought we would get .500 ball this year.

John: What happened is sort of complicated, but not incredibly so. What happened was Blake Bortles was good enough last season to look really good at times – but not good enough for the Jaguars to win very often. What also happened was he didn’t make some necessary strides in decision-making and accuracy in the offseason. What happened along with that is defenses this season schemed to take away his best receiver’s best play – i.e., Allen Robinson’s deep, 50-50 ball. What happened is that a combination of those things and a bit of digression has meant that Bortles really has struggled this season, particularly with games in the balance. And yeah, you weren’t alone: a lot of people thought the Jaguars would improve, but when you have a minus-17 turnover ratio and don’t play well in the fourth quarter it’s difficult to win in the NFL.

Logan from Wichita, KS:
So for Christmas all of us Jags fans just get another year of the middle finger. All our old coaches are succeeding. A lot of our former players are Pro-Bowl bound. And we have our ninth straight losing season and sixth straight top ten pick. Why do we never get anything nice? I’m sick of this constant hopelessness.

John: Merry Christmas, Logan.

Jordan from Jacksonville:
What is the culture like inside the building during the Doug Marrone era?

John: The culture during the Doug Marrone era is the culture of a team with an interim coach. That means it’s a culture of players trying to adjust quickly while playing the final two games of a season long since lost. Marrone is a very capable coach and I think he has handled a difficult situation as well as can be expected. But to expect a major culture change in three days is expecting a lot.

Dan from Jacksonville:
Am I the only one who believes Gus should not have been fired? I honestly believe the Jags let a very talented (albeit imperfect) coach go – and in doing so, decreased their chances of long-term success. Gus turned the Jags into a competitive team that could potentially beat any team in the NFL. As a fan who has followed the Jags closely since 1999, I truly believe Gus was building something special here and was on the verge of breaking through a barrier that would make the Jags a playoff contender. The barrier perhaps was a strong, consistent quarterback. To me, the Jags no longer seem like the Jags without Gus. Something special died last Sunday. Am I alone in these sentiments! John or are others feeling the same way?

John: You’re not alone, though you’re obviously in the minority. I said often I didn’t believe Gus Bradley was the predominant reason the Jaguars were 14-48 during his tenure. I also thought a lot of the 2-12 record this season was out of his control. At the same time, it’s close to impossible to maintain even the most positive of cultures forever in professional sports when you’re not winning. I’m all for continuity, but as I also said many times in recent weeks: continuity was going to be a tough, tough sell after four years with so few victories.

Matt from DC:
You indicate that “Bortles has some attributes that still give him a chance to be a franchise quarterback.” Other than size, what are the attributes that you believe he has that are indicative of franchise quarterback potential?

John: Size. Leadership ability. The proven production from 2015. The moments – and there have been moments – when he makes special plays and special throws that not every quarterback can make. These things I’ve listed aren’t enough, and he has to add a lot, but those are the attributes that at least give him a chance.

Carol from Jacksonville:
I watched Blake’s press conference Wednesday and I am extremely sad that he continually said “we” should have done more, etc. about Gus getting fired. If you are the quarterback you should just say you should have done more … the “we” part really shook me – this man has not been taught to take the blame for what he has caused – two offensive coordinator firings and one head coach.

John: I was at the press conference, Carol – and I heard Bortles say “I.” I also have listened to most of Bortles’ public press statements during his NFL career. I can tell you that of all of Bortles’ shortcomings as an NFL quarterback, an unwillingness to take the blame for his play is not among them.

Pamela from Atlantic Beach, FL:
John, I know we’re looking ahead, but Tom Savage was yet another example of a backup ready to play; so I’m hoping we can see someone other than Bortles under center this week. If he truly gives us the best chance to win then there can be no debate as to whether we have the worst quarterback room in the league, and if Billy O can pull his $70 Million dollar man we can certainly sit Blake.

John: I have received many, many emails along these lines this week. I get it. I understand the sentiment. I wouldn’t be against seeing Brandon Allen play. At this point, there’s probably not much harm – and at this point, I don’t even know that it would shake up the dynamic of Bortles potentially being the franchise guy moving forward. What I can tell you is I would be very surprised if Bortles doesn’t start and play all of the games the next two weeks.

Ken from Ontario, CA:
For Bortles to be our “Franchise Quarterback” we need to address the offensive line this coming offseason. Plain and simple. Give him another second every play to be protected, a line that can be better at the running game and a line that’s healthy. Plain and simple. Oh… and a head coach with a “run-first-to-get-a-second-and-short” mentality. Blake’s got potential, just need to surround him with some big healthy offensive linemen.

John: OK.

Morgan from Jacksonville:
I know it is very unlikely, but what would you think about bringing Gus back to be the defensive coordinator under a new head coach? The defense is on the rise for the most part and we brought him here after his defensive success. Is it just too much going on after his release for him to have a chance at coming back in a lesser role?

John: Gus Bradley won’t be the Jaguars’ defensive coordinator next season.

Dan from Orange Park, FL:
Zone, I’m counting seven Raiders Pro Bowl selections that all could have just as easily been Jags either via draft or free agency over the past four years – as compared to our zero. So, if Reggie McKenzie is the standard by which all other general managers shall be measured since 2013, what grade would you give Caldwell?

John: Not as good as McKenzie’s yet, obviously.

Ryan from Dearborn, MI:
John, I just read the best quote of the week regarding the firing of Gus Bradley, and it comes from Malik Jackson. This is why some of us wanted Gus fired earlier in the season. Jackson: “It is what it is. The train doesn’t stop for anybody. Gus got fired. We’ve got to keep rolling and go out here and win some games, or Khan’s going to fire one of us, too.” That’s what this team needs. A real fire lit under them and a belief that their jobs really are on the line if they don’t turn it around.

John: Jackson’s quote pretty much sums it up. As for whether a substantial “fire” would have been lit with a coaching change – it usually doesn’t work that way. A coaching change usually results in a one- or two-game impact – and then the team settles back to its normal level. Alas, we’ll never know.

Steve from Crystal River:
It may be obvious to some but I am really struggling with this. There are hundreds of college football programs in this country. That means there are hundreds of quarterbacks in this country playing college. I realize that the level of competition is different. However, why is it so hard to find 32 competent quarterbacks in the NFL with so many that play the position? I get it … not everyone can be Tom Brady. But shouldn’t it be easy to find the Andy Dalton-like or Dak Prescott-like kids out of all the colleges? It just seems like it should be easier than what it has been for teams than it is. What is the problem?

John: One problem is that college and professional football are different enough to practically be different sports. The difference in the speed of the game makes it so. Why is it hard to find a quarterback who can play at a high level in the NFL? The simplest answer is it’s a hard position. Like, really hard.

O-Zone: Get over it

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Logan from Wichita, KS:
This Sunday is either going to be really good or really, really, really bad. What team shows up? The one fighting to prove it belongs next year or the one broken by a bad record and losing its coach? I am begging for it to be the first one because I DO NOT want to be blown out like a bunch of rejects by the Titans again.

John: I can guarantee you the Titans will not blow out the Jaguars Sunday. I will go a step further and guarantee they will not beat the Jaguars Sunday.

Daniel from Duval:
I really think Abry Jones can keep the starting job next season the way he has been playing lately. He is a great run stuffer.

John: I think you’re right on both points, and I also think Jones is a pretty good pass rusher for his position. The thought was the Jaguars would really miss nose tackle Roy Miller when he was injured earlier this season against Oakland. Jones has played well enough in his place that Miller hasn’t been missed nearly as much as many thought.

Clif from Washington, DC:
I think it’s hilarious people want to blame Blake for Gus being fired. The Texans have a worse quarterback situation than the Jags and yet they somehow managed to win eight games this year without Watt. Gus is a bad head coach. It’s not a debate.

John: Yes, because it’s always coaching in the NFL.

Brian from Gainesville, FL:
Big O, please help us understand the decision to play Myles Jack only in non-running situations. He can’t defend the run? Why? Because of his high-level athleticism? Is it the fact that he understands the run game intimately? His otherworldly speed? I mean, c’mon. It’s not a knock on Skuta, but let’s remember that but for a concern about Jack’s long-term health, he was in the conversation for being picked over Jalen Ramsey and Ramsey is THE future of the Jaguars defense.

John: I understand the confusion over this issue. Many fans want Jack to play more and I get it. I think Jack should be playing more, too – because I’d like to see what he can do in a full-time situation. Jaguars coaches believe Skuta is the better option in heavy run packages. Considering that the defense has played at a pretty high level for the most part against the run, who knows? Maybe the coaches are right in this case.

Charlie from Jacksonville:
John, can you put in a good word for Sean Payton? I think he’d be ‘purrfect’ for the job. Maybe he could bring Drew Brees along, too. Wouldn’t that be something? Mention his name to Shad for me, would you?

John: Will do.

Cary from Montreal, Quebec:
I was wondering why the NFL doesn’t have full-time refs? I feel like I’ve seen more suspect calls and non-calls this season than I can remember. And there is definitely more criticism by player – or at least it seems that way. The NFL makes so much money … why are the refs part time? Heck, the CFL refs are better than the NFL; they are more consistent.

John: The NFL reportedly does plan to hire 17 full-time officials next season, and it essentially would add a referee to each crew. I’m fine with adding an official to each crew, and I guess there’s some benefit to a limited number of full-time officials. The new additions reportedly will focus on training and consultation year-round, and I suppose that makes some sense. Still, I honestly don’t see much reason to go crazy in this area. I’ve never been a big proponent of full-time officials because I can’t for the life of me figure how it will help improve officiating all that much – or for that matter what they will do to fill a 40-hour-a-week, 52-week-a-year job.

Ray from Jacksonville:
John: If everything was so amicable, why was the Bradley news conference conducted away from the facility?

John: He was no longer the head coach of the Jaguars.

Derrick from Jacksonville:
Let me start by stating the obvious: Gus is a good man. I understand that coaching is not the only reason for the Jags’ failure this year. But as the head coach, the buck stops there. Gus was the victim of his own decision-making when it came to Blake Bortles. He should have made a change and sat Blake Bortles for a game or two. Continuing to do the same thing expecting different results is by definition insanity. You keep stating that the organization believes in Bortles. The more important question that needs to be answered is does the other players believe in Bortles? Do you really think they still believe?

John: I’ve seen insanity defined as “extreme folly or unreasonableness,” but amazingly enough I’ve never seen it defined “continuing to do the same thing expecting different results” – although I’ve seen it attributed to Albert Einstein. Whatever. As for players’ belief in Bortles … I think human nature would make it reasonable for teammates to have at least some doubt. The team is 2-12 and he has struggled at times this season. But I think this offense has to have a lot of doubts all around – and that goes far beyond Bortles. The struggles have been extreme and involve more than one player.

James from Socorro, NM:
Referencing a recent email, one could say based on last year: “Bottom line for 2016. Offense is well on its way to being very good. Defense has a loooooooonnnngggg way to go.” Many were expecting the offense to be good this year and it clearly was not. Who is to say that the defense will be good next year?

John: There obviously is no guarantee that the defense will be good next year. I would say the same thing about the Jaguars’ defense this season as I said about the Jaguars’ offense last season – that while it has made strides from the previous season, there are still strides to be made. The offense last season improved from the season before, but it clearly needed to improve as a running offense and quarterback Blake Bortles clearly still needed to develop in some key areas this season. Neither happened. The defense this season improved from last season, but it clearly needs to make more impact plays and needs to create more pass rush next season. If that happens, then there are pieces in place around which a solid defense can be built. If not …

Travis from a land far, far away.:
O’Bro, with a weak quarterback class in the upcoming draft, and the intense scrutiny of the fans to can Bortles (which I disagree with), how do you think the team will approach this offseason to solidify the quarterback position?

John: I don’t think anyone will have the faintest idea what the Jaguars will do at quarterback next season until we know more about the next head coach.

Jeff from Yulee, FL:
Correct me if I’m wrong, Zone, but under the Gus Bradley regime – and still under the David Caldwell regime – the Jags seem to focus all in on one side of the football field each offseason. In 2014, offense was terrible, defense was better though not great, so Gus/Dave went mostly offense. In 2015, offense was much better, defense was much worse, Dave/Gus focus on defense in 2016. This year, defense is much improved, and offense is a disaster. It almost seems as if Gus/Dave spent all their time and energy on improving one side of the ball while completely ignoring or doing very little to improve the other side of the ball since in their mind it didn’t need “fixing.” Just an observation, and perhaps one of the reasons Gus didn’t work out. I think the inconsistencies on the offense this year and the defense last year, fall mostly on Gus/Dave’s shoulders. What say you O-man?

John: Well, of course the inconsistencies on a particular side of the ball in recent seasons fall on Dave Caldwell and Gus Bradley; they have been the general manager and head coach, so on their shoulders do such things fall. As far as recent offseasons emphasizing one side of the ball or the other – yes, things played out that way. The Jaguars focused heavily on offense in the 2014 NFL Draft and the 2015 offseason, and until this season it seemed that focus had paid off. This season has cast serious doubt on that notion. The 2016 NFL Draft and offseason seem to have improved the defense dramatically, and that improvement seems to be real. I expect focus on both side of the ball this offseason, though it certainly seems reasonable to think offense could have a touch more emphasis.

Bill from Danville:
Jack is not a typical strong-side linebacker. The other two linebackers are playing his typical positions and are doing better than the rookie could. END OF STORY, GET OVER IT!!!

John: Oh yeah – that, too.

O-Zone: Color coordination

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Kevin from Jacksonville:

While I agree it’s the players’ jobs to execute the plays, I do think coaching has much more of an influence than is being given credit. The coaches decide which players are on the field, so – for example – when you have an ‘otherworldly’ talent in Myles Jack on the bench because Dan Skuta is five pounds heavier … that’s a coaching decision. When we get a first-half lead and try to squat on it, that is a coaching decision. I think it’s disheartening for the players to hear all week that our goal is to be aggressive and compete, which is great, but then on Sunday we changed our tune and were calling very conservative games.

John: Coaching indeed has an influence, and there’s no question it’s the coaches’ decision to play Dan Skuta at Otto linebacker in run situations. I’m not a huge fan of that because it’s probably time to see the rookie full-time. Still, considering the Jaguars’ defense has played at a pretty high level it’s hard to argue vehemently against the decision. The approach being taken offensively is trickier. I absolutely think that at some point you have to let Blake Bortles and this offense try to make plays downfield. He can’t be a big-time NFL quarterback with such an obvious emphasis on the screen pass and back-shoulder throws. At the same time, you’re talking about a quarterback who has struggled with interceptions fairly significantly. It’s not hard to see why coaches would scheme to avoid that.

Tom from Orlando, FL:

3-13?

John: Sure, why not?

Raymond from Jacksonville:

John: “It’s not easy to find a franchise quarterback, and you don’t want to give up on one until you’re sure he’s not one.” Please stop. The only time the words “franchise” and “Bortles” should be in the same sentence is if he buys a McDonald’s franchise with the money the Jags have needlessly paid him.

John: I didn’t write that I believe Bortles is destined to be a franchise quarterback. The results of his first three seasons don’t suggest that. But there is a limited pool of potential franchise quarterbacks, and the vast majority of those players are the property of other teams. Bortles has some attributes that still give him a chance to be a franchise quarterback – and he did some things in 2015 that also made it appear he could be that. The reason you continue to start him through this season is there is still a belief in the building that could happen. At some point very soon there will be conversations with head-coaching candidates on the matter – and the person who is selected will have input into Bortles’ role and future with the Jaguars. That’s when the Jaguars’ approach with Bortles could change. But I don’t see it changing in the next two weeks.

Chris from Houston, TX:

John, stop the love affair with Gus. When you lose as much as he did, then who really cares how nice you are or that he is a “good man?” For the last two days all you posted are the “We will miss you, good man Gus – even though you consistently lost game after game.” Time to move on from losing Gus as Shad should’ve done weeks ago. My question is, “What is the tone in the locker room now?” I think that since now the dead weight of Gus is finally off their backs, that the team will come out and play inspired football.

John: Thank you for the input, Chris. I’ll go ahead and keep answering questions in the O-Zone to the best of my ability, and I’ll keep appreciating and incorporating your input when appropriate. I’ll also laud someone for being a good man pretty much when I see fit – though I can check with you on that front if necessary. As far as the tone in the locker room, let’s just say the Jaguars’ players didn’t consider Bradley dead weight – and whatever their issues have been this season, inspiration or effort hasn’t been among them.

Otto from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:

John, I’m looking at the latest stats. Out of the Top 6 sacks leaders in the NFL, five are linebackers. With our players, wouldn’t a 3-4 defense make sense? Malik and Yannick at end and Roy/Sen’Derrick at nose tackle. OLBs Telvin, Dante. ILBs Poz and Myles. Didn’t Fowler play standing up a lot at Florida? Any thoughts?

John: This is an idea that’s getting floated a lot, and I have nothing philosophically against a 3-4 defensive scheme. The overriding problem with the idea for the Jaguars is it really doesn’t solve their issue of how to get linebackers Paul Posluszny, Myles Jack and Telvin Smith on the field at the same time. While Dante Fowler Jr. indeed would fit into a 3-4 scheme as an outside linebacker, Jack, Posluszny and Smith are more inside linebackers in that scheme.

Ben from Jacksonville:

How many games does Blake have to lose before David Caldwell and this staff loses faith in him? The guy has done more to lose games than to win. He should not be our quarterback next year. Hearing Caldwell’s presser it worries me that he’s going to hire a coach that agrees with him and wants to keep Bortles. Can you say Gabbert 2.0?

John: We’re not there yet.

Tom from Orlando, FL:

Mr. O, please correct me if my facts are wrong. The Jaguars are using Myles Jack at the strong-side linebacker position in base packages. When it looks like a power-running formation, or an obvious running situation, they bring in Dan Skuta. However, in obvious passing situations, they switch to the nickel package, and take the strong-side linebacker out for a third cornerback. Now, if this is the case – and you want your best players on the field – why don’t they move Jack to middle linebacker and take Poz out in the nickel package? His sideline-to-sideline speed and playmaking ability needs to be on the field when the opponent is airing it out.

John: Your facts are correct about how Jack and Skuta are being used, and I think that putting Jack on the field in nickel situations is something that will be done in the future. For now, the thought among the coaches is that Paul Posluszny is playing at such a high level that they don’t want to take him out of the nickel package.

Alan from Jacksonville:

It’s hard to believe we were one injury away from playing Ben Koyack at offensive tackle. I blame our lack of drafting at least one offensive lineman last year. It seems like we were scoring in the third round with Brandon Linder and A.J. Cann, so why did we stop there? Just to handle attrition it would seem smart to at least draft one or two offensive line every year … and not just in Rounds 6 or 7. It’s why we can’t run the ball. I can’t think of a great team that didn’t have an outstanding offensive line. To me this is, well, offensive.

John: The Jaguars were an injury away from playing Koyack at offensive tackle Sunday because they had in-game injuries that sidelined first Jeremiah Poutasi then Josh Wells. They opted to leave Luke Bowanko inactive Sunday, which meant they had seven offensive linemen active. Because Wells was a swing tackle, they entered the game with a backup at tackle (Wells) and a backup at center/guard (Tyler Shatley). This is not an uncommon approach in the NFL – and carrying seven offensive linemen in a game isn’t uncommon either. It has nothing to do with how many offensive linemen the Jaguars have drafted. As for drafting an offensive lineman or two every year, I’m all for it but you can only draft so many players each year and there’s attrition at a lot of positions. There’s no question the offensive line must improve, though. I expect it to be a major area of offseason focus – at left guard, right tackle and perhaps more. Still, that issue doesn’t have anything to do with Koyack nearly playing tackle Sunday; that was a result of a run of injuries.

O-Zone: Bottom line

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Evan from Tallahassee, FL:

John, I sent a scathing email Sunday right after the game before Gus Bradley was fired criticizing the losing culture around this team. While I don’t take back what I said – there’s definitely a losing culture around this team – I want to give credit where credit is absolutely due. Gus is a man’s man for flying back on the team plane, then having a media availability session the next day where he heaped praise on the organization that just fired him. I can think of about zero other NFL head coaches – or people in general – who have the class to address this kind of situation in such a graceful way. Gus Bradley … you might doubt his coaching ability, but there’s no doubting he’s one hell of a man.

John: This is true. Bradley handled the aftermath of his dismissal Sunday as he handled his entire Jaguars tenure – with dignity and class. He had no problem flying on the charter because he knew he had approached his job the right way, and he knew there was no shame in that. Was it the most enjoyable experience of his life? Surely not. But it was one he could handle. I wasn’t surprised Bradley chose to speak with the media Monday, although he was under no obligation to do so. He chose to do so because he always believed his mission with the Jaguars was about more than just winning. He believed it was about conducting himself in a certain way, shaping players on and off the field and helping to build the Jaguars into a team of which the city and area would be proud. He accomplished the first two. Some would say he didn’t accomplish the latter because the team didn’t win. That’s fine. People can remember and judge Bradley how they choose – and there’s little doubt that the time had come where a move had to be made. But that doesn’t change what he gave to this team and this community. He did handle himself with grace and class, and I think a lot of people will remember him that way.

Rob from Rochester, NY:

Wow, John. This is the worst offense in the league. Letting the clock run out with a minute left in the first half and three timeouts? If you can’t trust your quarterback to throw the ball 8-10 yards and get a couple first downs he belongs on the bench.

John: This appears to be developing into more and more of an issue in the last couple of weeks. It seemed against Minnesota last week that the Jaguars were reluctant to have quarterback Blake Bortles throw downfield and to take many chance throws. It felt that way again on Sunday against Houston, and Bortles talked extensively after the game about the need to stay aggressive offensively. He likened the offense in the second half to a basketball team passing the ball around and until the shot clock runs down, then heaving a three-pointer. It’s pretty clear from that statement that Bortles wants to go downfield – and yes, he must be able to do that if he’s going to be an effective NFL quarterback. Can he do that effectively? Can the Jaguars figure out a way for him to do effectively? I’d like to see them attempt it in the last two games.

Jerry from Ponte Vedra Beach, FL:

Nice of Gus to take the time to thank everyone. Many coaches would be bitter and make excuses. He is a class act and his personality will be missed. Go Jags.

John: Yep.

Mac from Neptune Beach, FL:

What draft picks would we likely have to give up to trade for Garappolo?

John: My guess is it would probably take a first-round selection to acquire Jimmy Garappolo – though the Jaguars will be selecting early enough in the draft that perhaps a second-round selection would be enough. There also is the school of thought that the past performances of many high-profile quarterbacks with little starting experience following trades – Brock Osweiler, for instance – could make general managers wary of such a move. There also is the possibility that all of this is moot, and that the Patriots might not want to Garappolo. While it appears Tom Brady could play forever, that’s unlikely to actually happen – and that could make the Patriots want to retain Garappolo. We’ll see.

Mario from Orlando, FL:

Dear Zone, I am sad Coach Bradley was fired. I feel that he was the victim of horrendous quarterback play. Coach Bradley can definitely have success with a good quarterback. Blake Bortles, on the other hand, doesn’t seem like he’ll have success under any coach.

John: Most coaches can have success with good quarterback play – and in that sense, there’s no question Bortles’ play this season hurt a lot of things around the Jaguars. Can Bortles find success under another coach? I think there’s a very good chance we’re going to find out.

Tommy from Jax:

I’m back. Not that you remember. I think I said I wasn’t coming back until both Gus and Blake were gone, but maybe it was only one. Anyway, Blake should feel pretty darn bad. I would say he’s about 89 percent of the reason Gus is gone. You can’t win football games when you don’t have at least average quarterback play. The only reason I don’t feel bad about Gus is because he was so blind to the overlying issue. I liked Gus … wish we could have had that team we all envisioned. I can’t wait till I see an O-Zone titled “Bortles Out.” He has ruined enough jobs. It’s time to go.

John: With Bradley now gone, there are two primary issues facing the team: Who will be the next head coach? And what will that mean for Bortles? It’s hard to say which is more important, though I would lean toward quarterback being the more pressing issue. I have written often that I believe better quarterback play would have meant a better record this season. Would better coaching have meant the same thing? Perhaps, but it’s my experience that quarterback in the NFL is a more important factor than coaching. That’s not me saying “Bortles must go.” It’s not easy to find a franchise quarterback, and you don’t want to give up on one until you’re sure he’s not one. Whatever your opinion on that topic, the Jaguars still believe Bortles can be that guy. He obviously must improve greatly and whoever is coaching this team next year obviously needs to believe in Bortles on some level if the franchise is going to move forward with Bortles and the new head coach. Stay tuned.

Aaron from White Hall, AR:

It really sucks that Gus had to be let go, but I understand why. I just hope they don’t go the Tom Coughlin route because there is a reason he was fired before. It’s like getting divorced then getting married again to that same person. It makes no sense.

John: Tom Coughlin absolutely makes sense as the Jaguars’ head coach. That doesn’t mean he would match the success he had here from 1996-1999. Past success is no guarantee of future success in the NFL, and – as is the case with any head coach – a lot would have to go right for Coughlin to succeed. But what you want out of a head coach is someone capable of setting the tone for an organization and capable of creating an environment in which players can succeed. Coughlin can do those things. I’d like to see a coach with head-coaching experience, because I think that would be a positive for what is still a young team. Because of those things … yeah, I’d like to see Coughlin as the head coach. That doesn’t mean he’s the only candidate or the best candidate, but I think he’s a darned good candidate.

Zac from Duval:

O-Man, this is the question you don’t want to answer and we all know how you’ll spin – but gonna ask it anyways… Is Blake Bortles really that much better than Tim Tebow?

John: I always smile when people assume there are questions I “don’t want to answer.” I think Bortles is better than Tebow – largely based on Bortles’ play at times in the 2015 season. Honestly, because of Tebow’s appearance in the playoffs, Bortles’ career to date hasn’t been all that much better than Tebow’s. But I do think overall he still has a lot more upside than Tebow. Now, if you look at this season … well, there have been some games for Bortles that have been a real struggle. The important question is whether Bortles’ career will be significantly better than that of Tebow. Right now, it’s close. If he’s going to be “that much better” than Tebow, he has a lot of improving to do in a hurry.

Brian from Jacksonville:

Myles Jack against Houston – eight out of 84 snaps. What are we, the fans, missing? Why isn’t he on the field more? I want the truth. I can handle the truth.

John: There’s not any real mystery here. The coaches are playing Dan Skuta when they think the opponent is going to be in heavy or run-oriented looks. They expected the Texans to be heavy run on Sunday, so Skuta played 31 snaps and Jack played eight. Whether or not you agree with that approach, that’s why it’s happening.

Brian from Section 238:

Bottom line for 2017. Defense is well on its way to being very good. Offense has a loooooooonnnngggg way to go.

John: That pretty much sums it up.

O-Zone: One more fer

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

Josh from Rochester, MN:

Sucks. I understand the move, but I don’t like it. Feels like starting over again.

John: This was one of seemingly countless emails Sunday evening and Monday morning on the obvious topic of the firing of Jaguars Head Coach Gus Bradley – and as might be expected, the emails ran a range of reaction and emotions. Relief. Disappointment. Hope. There were also the expected I-told-you-soers who have wanted Bradley fired for a long time and were ecstatic it “finally” happened. All of that’s fine. It’s part of being a fan, and firing an NFL head coach understandably brings a slew of reaction. The bottom line: however you feel about Bradley as a head coach, it was going to be difficult if not impossible to bring him back after this season. It had simply reached an end. I have written often and will continue to write that Bradley was overly criticized and that to blame him entirely for the 14-48 record over four seasons is to ignore that for the first two and perhaps three seasons it would have been difficult for any coach to have had a better record than he did. But when Bradley received a contract extension late last season, it became obvious the Jaguars were going to need to at least get pretty close to a winning record for Bradley to continue as head coach. That didn’t happen. While Bradley made mistakes and while the Jaguars showed a disturbing lack of discipline at times this season, I don’t believe that Bradley was remotely all that ailed the Jaguars this season. Had quarterback Blake Bortles played marginally better, the Jaguars could have won four or five more games – and if that had happened, the conversation around Bradley would have been much different. But whatever the reason, it was clear it was time for a change. You can only lose so long in the NFL as a head coach before a change is going to be made and it was clearly going to happen in the coming weeks. As it was, it happened Sunday. Does that mean starting over? In one sense, yes, because the direction will be new. But there is talent on this roster and this doesn’t have to be a massive “rebuild” on the scale of 2013. Will a change provide a spark? Will a new direction be the answer? That’s the hope. Jaguars General Manager David Caldwell will speak to the media at 2 p.m. Monday. We’ll start finding out more about that direction then.

Dave from Duval:

We’re not happy Gus was fired. We thought that the future of the franchise is better off without Gus as the head coach – and apparently the owner agreed. Stay tuned.

John: Everyone involved in the decision hopes that the future of the franchise indeed is brighter than the recent past – Bradley absolutely included. I have no doubt that will be the case, and the time indeed had come where a move was inevitable. Will change bring results? That’s the hope. Was Bradley chiefly responsible for what was going wrong with the organization? I have my doubts, but perhaps the shakeup and redirection that a coaching change brings will have the desired results. As you say, stay tuned.

Don from Duval:

I know you’re hurting now, Zoney. But time heals wounds unless you’re a Jags fan. Then time brings new deeper wounds.

John: This day isn’t remotely about me. Am I sorry that a good man lost his job and didn’t find success despite complete and total heartfelt commitment to that cause? Of course. To feel otherwise would lack a certain amount of decency and compassion, I think. But don’t feel for me. Feel for Bradley, and the families of coaches whose lives will be affected by this. That’s real-life stuff, and not something to celebrate.

Andrew from Mattoon, IL:

Tip of the hat to Coach Gus. Loved his passion and positive attitude. I wish him well wherever he lands.

John: Indeed.

Jeff from Jacksonville:

I keep hearing that one of the reasons Gus didn’t have success is because he didn’t bring enough of his “own players” from Seattle to help implement the type of locker-room culture he wanted. How important do you actually think this is to coaching?

John: I actually haven’t heard that theory a whole lot and I don’t know how much different the last four seasons would have been had Bradley brought players from Seattle. Unless, of course, those players were named Earl Thomas, Richard Sherman, Russell Wilson, Marshawn Lynch, Kam …

Dave from Jacksonville:

Maybe if we get an even nicer head coach this time it will work out better.

John: Perhaps. Niceness doesn’t really have anything to do with anything either way, but if you want a mean guy … who knows … maybe Shad Khan and David Caldwell will shoot that to the top of the list.

Merry Christmas from Earth:

The next head coach should not be stuck with No. 5 because he is a coach killer. I hope they give him the chance to start with who he wants at quarterback. But can we admit this rebuild was a failure and no team should ever rebuild like this again?

John: I think there’s still a lot to be said for the way the Jaguars tried to rebuild the culture of the organization. And there’s little question that you must try to rebuild primarily through the draft. I would say in retrospect that the main issue that hurt the Jaguars the last couple of seasons was an overall lack of experienced core players at key spots in the roster. This remains a young team at some critical spots without core players who have been with the Jaguars since the beginning of their careers. It’s difficult to have such players when you draft poorly and that was part of the dilemma General Manager David Caldwell faced when he took over the roster. It takes time to draft and develop your own core guys into six- and-seven-year veterans. That’s what this team really, really lacks—that, of course, and reliable play at quarterback.

Brian from Section 238:

Bench Bortles. You can’t argue otherwise.

John: I doubt that happens this season.

Scotty from Points North:

Call it what you will but hiring a new coach is a rebuild. Oh the pain of being a Jaguar fan …

John: OK.

Matt from Union City, TN:

Ramsey is other worldly. That is all. #DTWD

John: It would have been easy before the announcement of Bradley’s dismissal to answer every question in O-Zone Late Night about Jalen Ramsey – his game Sunday was that memorable and his performance was that spectacular. He made at least six momentum-turning, highlight plays – and his best play may not even have been the 25-yard interception return that set up a first-half field goal. He also broke up a fade pass to wide receiver DeAndre Hopkins in the second quarter to cap a key goal-line stand, and he leveled Hopkins to break up a potential first-down converting pass. This was a battle all day between two big-time players and both players got their share of victories in one-on-one battles. But Ramsey is destined to be a big-time, All-Pro cornerback in the NFL – and Sunday was a vivid example of why.

John from St. Augustine, FL:

John, all you have to go on when you hire a coach with no experience is what he did as a coordinator and his ability to knock the interview out of the park. If a guy has been a head coach you have a better idea of what he will do. We went new guy last time, KC went fired guy … fired guy has been pretty good.

John: You’re right. Andy Reid has been successful in Kansas City. And John Fox has struggled mightily with the Chicago Bears after coaching in Super Bowls in Carolina and Denver. If you hired the right coach and put him in the right situation, it usually will yield results whether or not the guy has experience. If you hire the wrong coach and put him in the wrong situation, it won’t. I have nothing against hiring an experienced head coach with a record of NFL success. In fact, I’d prefer it. But let’s not pretend it’s a fail-safe formula. There’s no such thing as a fail-safe formula for hiring a head coach. If one existed, every team would use it and every team would win Super Bowls.

Chris from Mandarin:

Where do we go from here? As you say, it’s not always about coaching in the NFL … even though, it’s always about coaching in the NFL.

John: Gus Bradley was just fired Sunday night, so the answer obviously is that the Jaguars don’t yet know exactly where they will go from here. Caldwell will speak to the media Monday afternoon, and I don’t imagine the criteria for the search for the next coach will be provided any particular detail. My personal belief is the specifics – defensive/offensive, players coach/disciplinarian, experienced/inexperienced – don’t matter all that much. I don’t even really care all that much if a guy has head coaching experience, though my guess is that will be a priority in this search. Find a head coach you believe in, and go from there. A wise man once said that there’s no fail-safe formula because if there was everyone would use it. I wish I could remember who that guy was. I really thought he was cool.

Steve from Jacksonville:

Here’s one last one for Gus.

John: Absolutely. One fer Gus.

O-Zone: The popular choice

JACKSONVILLE – Let’s get to it …

GPP from Savannah, GA:

Why is David Caldwell getting a pass when it was his decision to draft Bortles? Caldwell’s other first-round picks have not been stellar nor have his free-agent signings.

John: I guess I’m never sure what “getting a pass” means when it comes to coaches or general managers. Jaguars General Manager David Caldwell has come under plenty of criticism from fans and media this season, and when Owner Shad Khan evaluates what’s going on with the Jaguars I’m quite certain he asks Caldwell questions and evaluates his performance. Does getting a pass mean not getting fired? If so, then yes … Caldwell might “get a pass.” I hope that’s the case, because despite not accomplishing the impossible task hitting on every free agent and draft selection over a four-year period he has put a structure in place and is building a foundation that can lead to this team to competitiveness and beyond. I don’t know if Khan agrees with that. We’ll see. Look, I get that people are talking a lot right now about who will “get a pass” and who won’t. The argument right now against Caldwell seems to be he “missed” on quarterback Blake Bortles. I don’t know that that’s written in stone yet, and I don’t know that missing on a quarterback must be grounds for firing – public perception notwithstanding. Overall I think Caldwell returning is the right move – because while the timetable may feel too long, the organization’s course in terms of young talent and potential moving forward remains strong. I don’t yet know what will happen on this front. I don’t know that many outside Khan do. Stay tuned.

Jordan from Little Valley:

Would you be upset with the fans if they throw a parade for Bradley’s 50th loss?

John: Fans can do what they want. I try not to let their actions dictate my emotions. I’ve learned it’s better that way.

Chuck from Jacksonville:

I know I am in the minority in the city, but I would like to give Dave and Gus one more year before we pull the plug. Their drafting seems to have us on the right track. Not all of the free-agent signings have been great, but the contracts were structured correctly and we know free agency is a crap shoot at best. If Blake had not regressed to a high-school quarterback, I believe the team would have more wins and be more competitive. I hate to think we are going to start over with the front office and coaches and change philosophy again when maybe one more year would put us where we need to be. Your thoughts?

John: You indeed are in the minority. I don’t know what will happen after the season. I wish I did. As I have said often in recent weeks … while I favor continuity in the NFL on a philosophical level, considering the expectations entering this season, continuity in this instance would be an exceedingly difficult path.

Travis from Duval:

Great News!! Actually, I don’t have any regarding the Jags, can you help?

John: Not actually, no.

Herbert from MidState Office Supply Accountz Receevablez:

Would you consider Brandon Allen to be a waste of a roster spot this season considering he’s been inactive for every game this season and the fact that most teams passed on him in the draft due to his small hands?

John: Not particularly, no. We won’t know for several seasons if Brandon Allen was a waste of a roster spot. If he never is the Jaguars’ primary backup quarterback and/or if the Jaguars never acquire anything for him in a trade, then perhaps he was a waste. If not, not.

Dave from Duval:

When you have been as bad as this franchise has been projecting and speculating quarterbacks, it does make sense to hold on to Bortles and extend the pain even longer. Then, he can twist the knife and add on to his record.

John: OK.

Casper from Orlando, FL:

Sometimes you must look at the stupidity represented in your mailbox and just shake your head.

John: If I ever am tempted to do such a thing I look in the mirror and remember my readers have the ability to shake their heads, too.

Jacob from North Carolina:

Would you consider sitting most of the starters in the final games to avoid injury? Or would you consider not starting people if they make it on the injury list (only start people who are “fully” healthy)? Or not make any changes in regards to starting players? I know we want to win now, but it would be nice to be fully healthy starting next year (but what do I know). Thanks!

John: I would be cautious with injured players in the sense that I wouldn’t play a player if an injury had them more at risk for further injury than otherwise would be the case. Aside from that … nah.

Steve from Nashville, TN:

On Monday, January 2 I suspect there will be changes announced in Jacksonville and maybe a few other NFL cities around the country. Will you be working that day?

John: To the best of my recollection I have worked the day after the NFL regular-season finale for each of the last 21 years. I see no reason why this season should be any different.

Matt from Orange Park, FL:

I know you hate when I ask this O-Man, but I’d love to get your thoughts. You actually think it’s OK to have a segment called Jags of the Round Table at a square table? C’mon, throw me a bone here.

John: I have no idea what you’re talking about.

Corey from Orange Park, FL:

I don’t get the distaste for Khan’s decision to finish out the season with Bradley. What does firing him now, as opposed to at the end of the season, do? If anything, I would say it shows we have an owner who will let you see through what you’re trying to accomplish. I don’t think of it as a bad thing. It was a four-year plan, and we are at the end of the fourth year. It isn’t ideal, and I’m definitely against retaining Bradley. But I remember Mel Tucker. I remember how irrelevant we still were. I know people want something to change, but this season is almost over and a change now will do nothing, in my opinion. Thanks for what you do, John!

John: I don’t get worked up about midseason coaching changes one way or the other. That’s because they historically have no real lasting benefit, and at the same time, there’s no real benefit or loss to whatever decision gets made. The interim coach usually is largely forgotten by the time a new coach is hired in January, and the mood/culture at that point within the building is dominated by the new coach and the changes that have taken place. Change coaches midseason, don’t change coaches midseason … whatever … the decision pales in comparison to what’s coming in a few weeks/months.

Don from Duval:

I think the worst part about this time of year, besides everything, is that if and when we win one of these garbage games it just hurts draft position and so I have doubly nothing to look forward to.

John: OK.

Brian from Gainesville, FL:

Big O, the question and answer regarding A-Rob’s body language and frustration sent shudders of worry through me. The one thing the Jaguars can cling to right now, and it’s a significant thing indeed, is that there is a growing core of good/great – most importantly, young – players around which the future will grow. But is there a chance that many of these young stars will simply abandon ship at the first opportunity leaving us staring down a new rebuild?

John: The Jaguars’ good, young players are under contract through at least the 2017 season. There is no reason the Jaguars can’t re-sign the core players they want to keep before they hit the open market.

Scott from Aurora, IL:

I’m back. Actually, let’s face it: I never left. I think firing Gus Bradley is not the answer. When you step back and really think about it, while not all things have gone well everywhere else all the time, there is only one part of the team that woefully underperformed and that is the quarterback position. Do everything, anything, you can to find a quarterback that can play at a Top 15 level and this team is pretty good.

John: Welcome back, Scott.

Michael from Middleburg, FL:

It’s beyond me how arm-chair quarterbacks and media know-it-alls think they know more about who, how much and where players play than the coaches.

John: Sometimes those arm-chair quarterbacks are right. And a lot of times they’re wrong. Sometimes the media know-it-alls are right, too. A lot of times they’re wrong. That’s what makes it exciting and fun.

Mark from Jacksonville:

Who is (or are) the people responsible for a 14-47 record? Ownership? General manager? Coaches? Players? Fans? O-Man?

John: It’s not the fans, but O-Man is starting to gain a lot of popularity.